Literature DB >> 27601539

Health-Related Quality-of-Life Results From the Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III ASPIRE Trial Evaluating Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

A Keith Stewart1, Meletios A Dimopoulos1, Tamás Masszi1, Ivan Špička1, Albert Oriol1, Roman Hájek1, Laura Rosiñol1, David S Siegel1, Ruben Niesvizky1, Andrzej J Jakubowiak1, Jesus F San-Miguel1, Heinz Ludwig1, Jacqui Buchanan1, Kim Cocks1, Xinqun Yang1, Biao Xing1, Naseem Zojwalla1, Margaret Tonda1, Philippe Moreau1, Antonio Palumbo1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the effects of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in the Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (ASPIRE) trial. Methods Patients with relapsed multiple myeloma were randomly assigned to receive KRd or Rd. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and myeloma-specific module were administered at baseline; day 1 of cycles 3, 6, 12, and 18; and after treatment. The Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale and seven subscales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, physical functioning, role functioning, disease symptoms, and adverse effects of treatment) were compared between groups using a mixed model for repeated measures. The percentages of responders with ≥ 5- or 15-point GHS/QoL improvement at each cycle were compared between groups. Results Baseline questionnaire compliance was excellent (94.1% of randomly assigned patients). KRd patients had higher GHS/QoL scores versus Rd patients over 18 treatment cycles (two-sided P < .001). The minimal important difference was met at cycle 12 (5.6 points) and approached at cycle 18 (4.8 points). There was no difference between groups for the other prespecified subscales from ASPIRE. A higher proportion of KRd patients met the GHS/QoL responder definition (≥ 5-point improvement) with statistical differences at cycle 12 (KRd v Rd patients, 25.5% v 17.4%, respectively) and 18 (KRd v Rd patients, 24.2% v 12.9%, respectively). Conclusion KRd improves GHS/QoL without negatively affecting patient-reported symptoms when compared with Rd. These data further support the benefit of KRd in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601539      PMCID: PMC5791840          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.9648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life assessed before and during chemotherapy predicts for survival in multiple myeloma. Nordic Myeloma Study Group.

Authors:  F Wisløff; M Hjorth
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Strategies to fit pattern-mixture models.

Authors:  Herbert Thijs; Geert Molenberghs; Bart Michiels; Geert Verbeke; Desmond Curran
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30.

Authors:  K Cocks; M T King; G Velikova; G de Castro; M Martyn St-James; P M Fayers; J M Brown
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma--does it matter?

Authors:  Ann Kristin Kvam; Anders Waage
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  Health related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing a double transplantation.

Authors:  C A Uyl-de Groot; I Buijt; I J M Gloudemans; G J Ossenkoppele; H P Berg; P C Huijgens
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Responsiveness and minimal important score differences in quality-of-life questionnaires: a comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C30 cancer-specific questionnaire to the generic utility questionnaires EQ-5D and 15D in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Ann Kristin Kvam; Peter M Fayers; Finn Wisloff
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Living with multiple myeloma: experiences of patients and their informal caregivers.

Authors:  Alex Molassiotis; Barbara Wilson; Susan Blair; Tracy Howe; James Cavet
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Practical and statistical issues in missing data for longitudinal patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Melanie L Bell; Diane L Fairclough
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not.

Authors:  Melanie L Bell; Michael G Kenward; Diane L Fairclough; Nicholas J Horton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-21

Review 10.  Review of health-related quality of life data in multiple myeloma patients treated with novel agents.

Authors:  P Sonneveld; S G Verelst; P Lewis; V Gray-Schopfer; A Hutchings; A Nixon; M T Petrucci
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  19 in total

1.  How are patient-reported outcomes and symptoms being measured in adults with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma? A systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew R LeBlanc; Rachel Hirschey; Ashley Leak Bryant; Thomas W LeBlanc; Sophia K Smith
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The proteasome as a druggable target with multiple therapeutic potentialities: Cutting and non-cutting edges.

Authors:  G R Tundo; D Sbardella; A M Santoro; A Coletta; F Oddone; G Grasso; D Milardi; P M Lacal; S Marini; R Purrello; G Graziani; M Coletta
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  The underreporting of phase III chemo-therapeutic clinical trial data of older patients with cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Karlynn BrintzenhofeSzoc; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Beverly Canin; Ira Parker; Amy R MacKenzie; Thuy Koll; Ritika Vankina; Christine D Hsu; Brian Jang; Kathy Pan; Jennifer L Lund; Edith Starbuck; Armin Shahrokni
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Patient-reported outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Sparano; Michele Cavo; Pasquale Niscola; Tommaso Caravita; Fabio Efficace
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Convenience, satisfaction, health-related quality of life of once-weekly 70 mg/m2 vs. twice-weekly 27 mg/m2 carfilzomib (randomized A.R.R.O.W. study).

Authors:  Philippe Moreau; Shaji Kumar; Ralph Boccia; Shinsuke Iida; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Kim Cocks; Andrew Trigg; Anita Zahlten-Kumeli; Emre Yucel; Sumeet S Panjabi; Meletios Dimopoulos
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  Carfilzomib boosted combination therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Raphael E Steiner; Elisabet E Manasanch
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: translating findings to the real-world setting.

Authors:  Paul G Richardson; Jesus F San Miguel; Philippe Moreau; Roman Hajek; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Jacob P Laubach; Antonio Palumbo; Katarina Luptakova; Dorothy Romanus; Tomas Skacel; Shaji K Kumar; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 11.037

8.  Impact of elotuzumab treatment on pain and health-related quality of life in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: results from the ELOQUENT-2 study.

Authors:  David Cella; Jan McKendrick; Amber Kudlac; Antonio Palumbo; Abderrahim Oukessou; Ravi Vij; Teresa Zyczynski; Catherine Davis
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 9.  Carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Pieter Sonneveld; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Mohamad Mohty; Karim S Iskander; Khalid Mezzi; David S Siegel
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Symptom burden and its functional impact in patients with "symptomatic" relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Mona Kamal; Xin Shelley Wang; Qiuling Shi; Teresa M Zyczynski; Catherine Davis; Loretta A Williams; Hui-Kai Lin; Araceli Garcia-Gonzalez; Charles S Cleeland; Robert Orlowski
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.