Tiebing Liu 1 , Chanyuan Zhang 2 , Chong Liu 3 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have indicated an increased risk of breast cancer (BC) among female flight attendants (FFAs); however, the results from epidemiological studies were not consistent. We thus conducted an updated meta-analysis to re-assess the risk of BC among FFAs, according to the MOOSE guideline. METHODS: A systematical search of PubMed and Embase for relevant observational studies up to March 2016 was performed, supplemented by manual reviews of bibliographies in relevant studies. A random effect model was conducted to calculate the combined standard incidence ratio (SIR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) in BC risk. RESULTS: Of the 719 citations retrieved, 10 were included, with more than 31 679 participants and 821 new cases. The combined SIR (95% CI) for BC in FFAs was 1.40 (95%CI 1.30-1.50), with no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.744; I(2 )=( )0.0%) or publication bias (Begg's test: z = 0.72, P = 0.474; Egger's test: t = 0.25, P = 0.805) among the included studies. The results were not significantly modified by publication year, geographic area, study quality or whether the fertility variables were adjusted. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that FFAs have a higher risk of BC compared with the general population. More vigorous studies with larger sample sizes based on other populations, including the Chinese, are needed. © International Society of Travel Medicine, 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have indicated an increased risk of breast cancer (BC) among female flight attendants (FFAs); however, the results from epidemiological studies were not consistent. We thus conducted an updated meta-analysis to re-assess the risk of BC among FFAs, according to the MOOSE guideline. METHODS: A systematical search of PubMed and Embase for relevant observational studies up to March 2016 was performed, supplemented by manual reviews of bibliographies in relevant studies. A random effect model was conducted to calculate the combined standard incidence ratio (SIR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) in BC risk. RESULTS: Of the 719 citations retrieved, 10 were included, with more than 31 679 participants and 821 new cases. The combined SIR (95% CI) for BC in FFAs was 1.40 (95%CI 1.30-1.50), with no significant heterogeneity (P = 0.744; I(2 )=( )0.0%) or publication bias (Begg's test: z = 0.72, P = 0.474; Egger's test: t = 0.25, P = 0.805) among the included studies. The results were not significantly modified by publication year, geographic area, study quality or whether the fertility variables were adjusted. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that FFAs have a higher risk of BC compared with the general population. More vigorous studies with larger sample sizes based on other populations, including the Chinese, are needed. © International Society of Travel Medicine, 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Entities: Disease
Species
Keywords:
Breast cancer incidence; circadian disruption; cosmic radiation; female flight attendants; meta-analysis
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2016
PMID： 27601531 DOI： 10.1093/jtm/taw055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Travel Med ISSN： 1195-1982 Impact factor: 8.490