Renate Pichler1, Tobias De Zordo2, Josef Fritz3, Alexander Kroiss4, Friedrich Aigner2, Isabel Heidegger5, Irene Virgolini4, Wolfgang Horninger5, Christian Uprimny4. 1. Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: Renate.Pichler@i-med.ac.at. 2. Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 3. Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Health Economics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 5. Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate lymph node (LN) staging in bladder cancer before radical cystectomy is essential as LN metastases have an independent prognostic value. Most studies used a cutoff of > 10 mm in detecting pelvic LN spread. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) alone, or combined for preoperative pelvic LN staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 70 bladder cancer patients that were staged with 18F-FDG-PET/CT before radical cystectomy between 2012 and 2015. 18F-FDG-PET images were analyzed visually and semi-quantitatively by calculating the maximum standardized uptake value. CT scans were reviewed using different cutoffs of pelvic LNs, with the best cutoff at 8 mm (area under the curve = 0.684). RESULTS: Metastatic LNs were confirmed in 53 (2.8%) of 1906 resected LNs in 11 (15.7%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 54.5%, 89.8%, and 84.3% for 18F-FDG-PET alone; 45.5%, 91.5%, and 84.3% for CT (LNs > 8 mm) alone; and 27.3%, 96.6%, and 85.7% for CT (LNs > 10 mm) alone, respectively. Combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT resulted in a nonsignificant increase of diagnostic accuracy using a cutoff > 8 mm for LN evaluation (63.6%, 86.4%, and 82.9%, respectively). A significant improvement of sensitivity to 63.6% was achieved only when LNs > 10 mm were considered suspicious (P = .046), but this reduced specificity to 88.1% (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT does not seem to be justified in preoperative staging if the threshold of pelvic LNs is set > 8 mm.
BACKGROUND: Accurate lymph node (LN) staging in bladder cancer before radical cystectomy is essential as LN metastases have an independent prognostic value. Most studies used a cutoff of > 10 mm in detecting pelvic LN spread. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) alone, or combined for preoperative pelvic LN staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 70 bladder cancerpatients that were staged with 18F-FDG-PET/CT before radical cystectomy between 2012 and 2015. 18F-FDG-PET images were analyzed visually and semi-quantitatively by calculating the maximum standardized uptake value. CT scans were reviewed using different cutoffs of pelvic LNs, with the best cutoff at 8 mm (area under the curve = 0.684). RESULTS: Metastatic LNs were confirmed in 53 (2.8%) of 1906 resected LNs in 11 (15.7%) patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 54.5%, 89.8%, and 84.3% for 18F-FDG-PET alone; 45.5%, 91.5%, and 84.3% for CT (LNs > 8 mm) alone; and 27.3%, 96.6%, and 85.7% for CT (LNs > 10 mm) alone, respectively. Combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT resulted in a nonsignificant increase of diagnostic accuracy using a cutoff > 8 mm for LN evaluation (63.6%, 86.4%, and 82.9%, respectively). A significant improvement of sensitivity to 63.6% was achieved only when LNs > 10 mm were considered suspicious (P = .046), but this reduced specificity to 88.1% (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT does not seem to be justified in preoperative staging if the threshold of pelvic LNs is set > 8 mm.
Authors: Avinash Maganty; Robert M Turner; Jonathan G Yabes; Dwight E Heron; Jeffrey R Gingrich; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Scott P Campbell; Alexander S Baras; Mark W Ball; Max Kates; Noah M Hahn; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Michael H Johnson; Martin G Pomper; Mohamad E Allaf; Steven P Rowe; Michael A Gorin Journal: Ann Nucl Med Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 2.668
Authors: Michał Frączek; Hubert Kamecki; Anna Kamecka; Roman Sosnowski; Katarzyna Sklinda; Marcin Czarniecki; Leszek Królicki; Jerzy Walecki Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2018-10
Authors: Vincenzo Cuccurullo; Giuseppe Danilo Di Stasio; Francesco Manti; Pierpaolo Arcuri; Rocco Damiano; Giuseppe Lucio Cascini Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-05-11