Literature DB >> 27601290

The use of concept mapping in measurement development and evaluation: Application and future directions.

Scott R Rosas1, John W Ridings2.   

Abstract

The past decade has seen an increase of measurement development research in social and health sciences that featured the use of concept mapping as a core technique. The purpose, application, and utility of concept mapping have varied across this emerging literature. Despite the variety of uses and range of outputs, little has been done to critically review how researchers have approached the application of concept mapping in the measurement development and evaluation process. This article focuses on a review of the current state of practice regarding the use of concept mapping as methodological tool in this process. We systematically reviewed 23 scale or measure development and evaluation studies, and detail the application of concept mapping in the context of traditional measurement development and psychometric testing processes. Although several limitations surfaced, we found several strengths in the contemporary application of the method. We determined concept mapping provides (a) a solid method for establishing content validity, (b) facilitates researcher decision-making, (c) insight into target population perspectives that are integrated a priori, and (d) a foundation for analytical and interpretative choices. Based on these results, we outline how concept mapping can be situated in the measurement development and evaluation processes for new instrumentation. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Group concept mapping; Measurement; Psychometric testing; Scale development

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601290     DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  20 in total

1.  Development of a Guideline to Enhance the Reporting of Concept Mapping Research: Study Protocol.

Authors:  Sandesh Pantha; Martin Jones; Richard Gray
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  A Multidimensional Tool Based on the eHealth Literacy Framework: Development and Initial Validity Testing of the eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ).

Authors:  Lars Kayser; Astrid Karnoe; Dorthe Furstrand; Roy Batterham; Karl Bang Christensen; Gerald Elsworth; Richard H Osborne
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  The systematic development of a complex intervention: HealthMap, an online self-management support program for people with HIV.

Authors:  Tanya Millard; Sarity Dodson; Karalyn McDonald; Karen M Klassen; Richard H Osborne; Malcolm W Battersby; Christopher K Fairley; Julian H Elliott
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  The preliminary measurement properties of the person-centred community care inventory (PERCCI).

Authors:  Mark Wilberforce; David Challis; Linda Davies; Michael P Kelly; Chris Roberts
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Conceptualization and Inventory of the Sexual and Psychological Burden of Women With Pelvic Floor Complaints; A Mixed-Method Study.

Authors:  Alma M Brand; Scott Rosas; Wim Waterink; Slavi Stoyanov; Jacques J D M van Lankveld
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.523

6.  Development of the organisational health literacy responsiveness (Org-HLR) framework in collaboration with health and social services professionals.

Authors:  Anita Trezona; Sarity Dodson; Richard H Osborne
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research.

Authors:  Antoine Regnault; Tom Willgoss; Skye Barbic
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-04-11

Review 8.  Questionnaire validation practice within a theoretical framework: a systematic descriptive literature review of health literacy assessments.

Authors:  Melanie Hawkins; Gerald R Elsworth; Elizabeth Hoban; Richard H Osborne
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Using concept mapping to develop a human rights based indicator framework to assess country efforts to strengthen rehabilitation provision and policy: the Rehabilitation System Diagnosis and Dialogue framework (RESYST).

Authors:  Dimitrios Skempes; John Melvin; Per von Groote; Gerold Stucki; Jerome Bickenbach
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.185

10.  The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool: measuring organizational capacity to promote sustainability in healthcare.

Authors:  Sara Malone; Kim Prewitt; Rachel Hackett; John C Lin; Virginia McKay; Callie Walsh-Bailey; Douglas A Luke
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.