| Literature DB >> 27601188 |
Mitsutoshi Kitao1, Yukio Yasuda2, Yuji Kominami3, Katsumi Yamanoi4, Masabumi Komatsu1, Takafumi Miyama3, Yasuko Mizoguchi4, Satoshi Kitaoka1, Kenichi Yazaki1, Hiroyuki Tobita1, Kenichi Yoshimura3, Takayoshi Koike5, Takeshi Izuta6.
Abstract
Ground-level ozone (O3) concentrations are expected to increase over the 21(st) century, especially in East Asia. However, the impact of O3 has not been directly assessed at the forest level in this region. We performed O3 flux-based risk assessments of carbon sequestration capacity in an old cool temperate deciduous forest, consisting of O3-sensitive Japanese beech (Fagus crenata), and in a warm temperate deciduous and evergreen forest dominated by O3-tolerant Konara oak (Quercus serrata) based on long-term CO2 flux observations. On the basis of a practical approach for a continuous estimation of canopy-level stomatal conductance (Gs), higher phytotoxic ozone dose above a threshold of 0 uptake (POD0) with higher Gs was observed in the beech forest than that in the oak forest. Light-saturated gross primary production, as a measure of carbon sequestration capacity of forest ecosystem, declined earlier in the late growth season with increasing POD0, suggesting an earlier autumn senescence, especially in the O3-sensitive beech forest, but not in the O3-tolerant oak forest.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27601188 PMCID: PMC5013268 DOI: 10.1038/srep32549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Locations of the cool temperate forest consisting of beech trees at Appi forest site and the warm temperate mixed deciduous and evergreen forest dominated by oak trees at Yamashiro forest site.
Maps are created by Dr. I. Tsuyama using ESRI ArcGIS (v9.3, http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgis-for-desktop).
Figure 2The mean of daytime O3 concentration above the canopy (red circles), AOT40 (gray bars) (A), mean of canopy stomatal conductance (Gs, black circles) and phytotoxic O3 dose above the threshold of 0 (POD0, white bars) (B) of the beech forest for each month during the growth period from 2001 to 2006 and of the oak forest (C,D, respectively) during the growth periods of 2004, 2005, and 2009. O3 concentration above the canopy was estimated by the multiple regression model for each forest site using O3 and NO2 concentrations at the adjacent air pollution station, as well as air temperatures both at the station and the forest site. Gs was estimated from the modified Ball–Woodrow–Berry model. The datasets from 2006 to 2008 are unavailable at present. Daytime was defined as the photoperiod when the photon flux density is >0.
Figure 3The relationship between the relative unit of light-saturated GPP (demonstrated as relative unit) and POD0 at the end of each period from the budbreak in the beech (A) and oak (B) forests. GPP_rel is calculated as follows: GPP_rel = (light-saturated GPP)/(maximum light-saturated GPP during the growth period for each year). The data are grouped by 2-week intervals from the budbreak demonstrated by different colors. Budbreaks in the beech forest occurred during April 30 to May 16, while those in the oak forest occurred during March 30 to April 8.
Summary of multiple linear regressions relating photosynthetic activity to environmental factors.
| Forest type | Dependent variable | Summary measures | Regression coefficients | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent variable | Coefficients | VIF | |||||
| Beech forest | GPP_rel (leaf maturation; spring–summer) | 0.80 (n = 35) | <0.001 | Leaf age | 0.446 | 0.003 | 3.30 |
| Photoperiod | 0.415 | <0.001 | 1.01 | ||||
| POD0 | 0.359 | 0.014 | 3.29 | ||||
| GPP_rel (leaf senescence; summer–autumn) | 0.76 (n = 33) | <0.001 | Leaf age | −0.687 | <0.001 | 1.21 | |
| VPD | −0.230 | 0.012 | 1.21 | ||||
| POD0 | −0.453 | <0.001 | 1.37 | ||||
| Oak forest | GPP_rel (leaf maturation: spring–summer) | 0.80 (n = 22) | <0.001 | Photoperiod | 0.371 | 0.0102 | 1.75 |
| POD0 | 0.616 | <0.001 | 1.75 | ||||
| GPP_rel (leaf senescence; summer–autumn) | 0.63 (n = 27) | <0.001 | Air temperature | 1.314 | <0.001 | 4.16 | |
| Precipitation | −0.193 | 0.148 | 1.41 | ||||
| VPD | −0.613 | 0.015 | 4.55 | ||||
Initial explanatory factors affecting photosynthetic performance: leaf age, photoperiod, air temperature, precipitation, VPD and POD0. All the variables were standardized to a mean of 0 and a variance of 1 prior to modeling to quantitatively evaluate the influence of the major explanatory factors. Stepwise regressions were undertaken to define the subset of effects that would altogether provide the smallest corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc) in subsequent modeling. As a measure of multicollinearity, variance inflation factor (VIF) is demonstrated. We considered that VIF greater than 5 constitutes a multicollinearity problem. In case of VIF(s) > 5, we removed the variable with the single highest VIF and then recalculated stepwise regressions using the remaining variables until all VIFs fell below 5.
Figure 4The relationship between the growth period and seasonal POD0 in the cool temperate beech forest (A). Growth period was defined when GPP > 0. Seasonal POD0 was set as POD0 for 22 weeks from the budbreak. The relationship between the day of year (DOY) of budbreak and seasonal POD0 in the previous year (B). DOYs of budbreak in 2002–2006 are plotted against POD0 in 2001–2005, respectively.