Literature DB >> 27601156

Using a social-ecological framework to inform the implementation of conservation plans.

Angela M Guerrero1, Kerrie A Wilson1.   

Abstract

One of the key determinants of success in biodiversity conservation is how well conservation planning decisions account for the social system in which actions are to be implemented. Understanding elements of how the social and ecological systems interact can help identify opportunities for implementation. Utilizing data from a large-scale conservation initiative in southwestern of Australia, we explored how a social-ecological system framework can be applied to identify how social and ecological factors interact to influence the opportunities for conservation. Using data from semistructured interviews, an online survey, and publicly available data, we developed a conceptual model of the social-ecological system associated with the conservation of the Fitz-Stirling region. We used this model to identify the relevant variables (remnants of vegetation, stakeholder presence, collaboration between stakeholders, and their scale of management) that affect the implementation of conservation actions in the region. We combined measures for these variables to ascertain how areas associated with different levels of ecological importance coincided with areas associated with different levels of stakeholder presence, stakeholder collaboration, and scales of management. We identified areas that could benefit from different implementation strategies, from those suitable for immediate conservation action to areas requiring implementation over the long term to increase on-the-ground capacity and identify mechanisms to incentivize implementation. The application of a social-ecological framework can help conservation planners and practitioners facilitate the integration of ecological and social data to inform the translation of priorities for action into implementation strategies that account for the complexities of conservation problems in a focused way.
© 2016 Society for Conservation Biology.

Keywords:  conservation opportunity; conservation planning; conservation prioritization; oportunidad de conservación; planeación de la conservación; priorización de la conservación; sistemas socio-ecológicos; social-ecological systems

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27601156     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  4 in total

1.  Implementation strategies for systematic conservation planning.

Authors:  Vanessa M Adams; Morena Mills; Rebecca Weeks; Daniel B Segan; Robert L Pressey; Georgina G Gurney; Craig Groves; Frank W Davis; Jorge G Álvarez-Romero
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Social Network Analysis Identifies Key Participants in Conservation Development.

Authors:  Cooper M Farr; Sarah E Reed; Liba Pejchar
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Microtargeting for conservation.

Authors:  Alexander L Metcalf; Conor N Phelan; Cassandra Pallai; Michael Norton; Ben Yuhas; James C Finley; Allyson Muth
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Connectivity as a multiple: In, with and as "nature".

Authors:  Timothy Hodgetts
Journal:  Area (Oxf)       Date:  2017-05-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.