PURPOSE: Averaging multiple repetitions to improve signal-to-noise ratio is common practice in magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). However, temporal variations in scanner B0 due to motion or gradient heating may cause spectra to become misaligned, broadening and distorting peaks and impacting on processing and quantification. We present a comparison using in vivo data of different methods for correcting these errors. METHODS: Three different correction methods were applied to 53 brain scans: residual water peak alignment, creatine fitting, and spectral registration. In 32 of 53 subjects, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was acquired prior to the MRS scan. We compared the resulting linewidths to find the most effective technique. In addition, the impact on metabolite concentration estimates was evaluated. RESULTS: MRS data acquired after DTI imaging exhibited a frequency drift four times higher than data without DTI, resulting in changes to metabolite concentrations, particularly glutamate/glutamine. All three correction methods produced significantly improved linewidths relative to uncorrected data, with spectral registration performing best by a small margin. CONCLUSION: Frequency correction is an important step in processing MRS data, significantly impacting metabolite quantification, particularly after echo-planar imaging that often occurs with MRS scans in clinical studies. Spectral registration proved most effective at frequency correction.
PURPOSE: Averaging multiple repetitions to improve signal-to-noise ratio is common practice in magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). However, temporal variations in scanner B0 due to motion or gradient heating may cause spectra to become misaligned, broadening and distorting peaks and impacting on processing and quantification. We present a comparison using in vivo data of different methods for correcting these errors. METHODS: Three different correction methods were applied to 53 brain scans: residual water peak alignment, creatine fitting, and spectral registration. In 32 of 53 subjects, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was acquired prior to the MRS scan. We compared the resulting linewidths to find the most effective technique. In addition, the impact on metabolite concentration estimates was evaluated. RESULTS: MRS data acquired after DTI imaging exhibited a frequency drift four times higher than data without DTI, resulting in changes to metabolite concentrations, particularly glutamate/glutamine. All three correction methods produced significantly improved linewidths relative to uncorrected data, with spectral registration performing best by a small margin. CONCLUSION: Frequency correction is an important step in processing MRS data, significantly impacting metabolite quantification, particularly after echo-planar imaging that often occurs with MRS scans in clinical studies. Spectral registration proved most effective at frequency correction.
Authors: Archana Asundi; Yvonne Robles; Tyler Starr; Alan Landay; Jennifer Kinslow; Joshua Ladner; Laura White; Rebeca M Plank; Kathleen Melbourne; Daniel Weisholtz; Monica Bennett; Hong Pan; Emily Stern; Alexander Lin; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Nina H Lin Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Celine Maes; Lize Hermans; Lisa Pauwels; Sima Chalavi; Inge Leunissen; Oron Levin; Koen Cuypers; Ronald Peeters; Stefan Sunaert; Dante Mantini; Nicolaas A J Puts; Richard A E Edden; Stephan P Swinnen Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-05-02 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Michael L Alosco; Yorghos Tripodis; Benjamin Rowland; Alicia S Chua; Huijun Liao; Brett Martin; Johnny Jarnagin; Christine E Chaisson; Ofer Pasternak; Sarina Karmacharya; Inga K Koerte; Robert C Cantu; Neil W Kowall; Ann C McKee; Martha E Shenton; Richard Greenwald; Michael McClean; Robert A Stern; Alexander Lin Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Jong Woo Lee; Lasya P Sreepada; Matthew B Bevers; Karen Li; Benjamin M Scirica; Danuzia Santana da Silva; Galen V Henderson; Camden Bay; Alexander P Lin Journal: Neurology Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mark Mikkelsen; Muhammad G Saleh; Jamie Near; Kimberly L Chan; Tao Gong; Ashley D Harris; Georg Oeltzschner; Nicolaas A J Puts; Kim M Cecil; Iain D Wilkinson; Richard A E Edden Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Molly F Charney; David R Howell; Corey Lanois; Tyler C Starr; Huijun Liao; Eduardo Coello; Katherine M Breedlove; William P Meehan; Inga Koerte; Alexander P Lin Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2020 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Esau Poblador Rodriguez; Philipp Moser; Barbara Dymerska; Simon Robinson; Benjamin Schmitt; Andre van der Kouwe; Stephan Gruber; Siegfried Trattnig; Wolfgang Bogner Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Prachi A Patkee; Ana A Baburamani; Katherine R Long; Ralica Dimitrova; Judit Ciarrusta; Joanna Allsop; Emer Hughes; Johanna Kangas; Grainne M McAlonan; Mary A Rutherford; Enrico De Vita Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Steve C N Hui; Mark Mikkelsen; Helge J Zöllner; Vishwadeep Ahluwalia; Sarael Alcauter; Laima Baltusis; Deborah A Barany; Laura R Barlow; Robert Becker; Jeffrey I Berman; Adam Berrington; Pallab K Bhattacharyya; Jakob Udby Blicher; Wolfgang Bogner; Mark S Brown; Vince D Calhoun; Ryan Castillo; Kim M Cecil; Yeo Bi Choi; Winnie C W Chu; William T Clarke; Alexander R Craven; Koen Cuypers; Michael Dacko; Camilo de la Fuente-Sandoval; Patricia Desmond; Aleksandra Domagalik; Julien Dumont; Niall W Duncan; Ulrike Dydak; Katherine Dyke; David A Edmondson; Gabriele Ende; Lars Ersland; C John Evans; Alan S R Fermin; Antonio Ferretti; Ariane Fillmer; Tao Gong; Ian Greenhouse; James T Grist; Meng Gu; Ashley D Harris; Katarzyna Hat; Stefanie Heba; Eva Heckova; John P Hegarty; Kirstin-Friederike Heise; Shiori Honda; Aaron Jacobson; Jacobus F A Jansen; Christopher W Jenkins; Stephen J Johnston; Christoph Juchem; Alayar Kangarlu; Adam B Kerr; Karl Landheer; Thomas Lange; Phil Lee; Swati Rane Levendovszky; Catherine Limperopoulos; Feng Liu; William Lloyd; David J Lythgoe; Maro G Machizawa; Erin L MacMillan; Richard J Maddock; Andrei V Manzhurtsev; María L Martinez-Gudino; Jack J Miller; Heline Mirzakhanian; Marta Moreno-Ortega; Paul G Mullins; Shinichiro Nakajima; Jamie Near; Ralph Noeske; Wibeke Nordhøy; Georg Oeltzschner; Raul Osorio-Duran; Maria C G Otaduy; Erick H Pasaye; Ronald Peeters; Scott J Peltier; Ulrich Pilatus; Nenad Polomac; Eric C Porges; Subechhya Pradhan; James Joseph Prisciandaro; Nicolaas A Puts; Caroline D Rae; Francisco Reyes-Madrigal; Timothy P L Roberts; Caroline E Robertson; Jens T Rosenberg; Diana-Georgiana Rotaru; Ruth L O'Gorman Tuura; Muhammad G Saleh; Kristian Sandberg; Ryan Sangill; Keith Schembri; Anouk Schrantee; Natalia A Semenova; Debra Singel; Rouslan Sitnikov; Jolinda Smith; Yulu Song; Craig Stark; Diederick Stoffers; Stephan P Swinnen; Rongwen Tain; Costin Tanase; Sofie Tapper; Martin Tegenthoff; Thomas Thiel; Marc Thioux; Peter Truong; Pim van Dijk; Nolan Vella; Rishma Vidyasagar; Andrej Vovk; Guangbin Wang; Lars T Westlye; Timothy K Wilbur; William R Willoughby; Martin Wilson; Hans-Jörg Wittsack; Adam J Woods; Yen-Chien Wu; Junqian Xu; Maria Yanez Lopez; David K W Yeung; Qun Zhao; Xiaopeng Zhou; Gasper Zupan; Richard A E Edden Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2021-07-24 Impact factor: 6.556