Malin Lövgren1, Thomas Sejersen2, Ulrika Kreicbergs3. 1. Ersta Sköndal University College, Department of Health Care Sciences, Palliative Research Centre, Box 11189, 100 61 Stockholm, Sweden; The Department of Women's and Children's Health, Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Childhood Cancer Research Unit, SE-177 77 Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: malin.lovgren@esh.se. 2. The Department of Women's and Children's Health, Paediatric Neurology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, SE-177 77 Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: Thomas.sejersen@ki.se. 3. Ersta Sköndal University College, Department of Health Care Sciences, Palliative Research Centre, Box 11189, 100 61 Stockholm, Sweden; The Department of Women's and Children's Health, Paediatric Oncology and Haematology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Childhood Cancer Research Unit, SE-177 77 Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address: Ulrika.kreicbergs@esh.se.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The parents of children with severe spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) face difficult ethical decisions regarding their child's treatment. This study explored the experience of parents of children with severe SMA concerning information and treatment decisions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This nationwide survey, conducted in 2013, is based on parents of children who were born in Sweden between 2000 and 2010 and later diagnosed with SMA type I or II where respiratory support was considered the first year of life (N = 61, participation rate: 87%). The survey involved parents' perception of the child's care and the questions used in this study covered information given and treatment decisions. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: None of the parents reported that the health care professionals made decisions concerning the child's treatment without informing them first, and 80% reported feeling confident about the decisions made. Of the bereaved parents, 11/48 (23%) reported that they got no information about respiratory support, compared to 2/13 (15%) of non-bereaved. Bereaved parents were more likely to report being satisfied with and understanding the information given about the illness and its treatment than non-bereaved parents. CONCLUSION: All parents reported having been informed before treatment decisions were made and a vast majority reported feeling confident about the decisions. However, a quarter of the parents declined to have received information about respiratory support, which indicates that the parents did not sufficiently understand the available respiratory treatment options, and that their children may not receive the kind of care that is recommended in guidelines.
INTRODUCTION: The parents of children with severe spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) face difficult ethical decisions regarding their child's treatment. This study explored the experience of parents of children with severe SMA concerning information and treatment decisions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This nationwide survey, conducted in 2013, is based on parents of children who were born in Sweden between 2000 and 2010 and later diagnosed with SMA type I or II where respiratory support was considered the first year of life (N = 61, participation rate: 87%). The survey involved parents' perception of the child's care and the questions used in this study covered information given and treatment decisions. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: None of the parents reported that the health care professionals made decisions concerning the child's treatment without informing them first, and 80% reported feeling confident about the decisions made. Of the bereaved parents, 11/48 (23%) reported that they got no information about respiratory support, compared to 2/13 (15%) of non-bereaved. Bereaved parents were more likely to report being satisfied with and understanding the information given about the illness and its treatment than non-bereaved parents. CONCLUSION: All parents reported having been informed before treatment decisions were made and a vast majority reported feeling confident about the decisions. However, a quarter of the parents declined to have received information about respiratory support, which indicates that the parents did not sufficiently understand the available respiratory treatment options, and that their children may not receive the kind of care that is recommended in guidelines.