| Literature DB >> 27600616 |
Roland Vergilino1, Christelle Leung1, Bernard Angers2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Co-dispersal of sperm-dependent hybrids and their sexual relatives is expected to result in consistent spatial patterns between assemblages of hybrids and genetic structure of parental species. However, local hybridization events may blur this signal as assemblages could be organized under different connectivity constraints. This study aims at testing the hypothesis of local hybridization events by comparing the assemblage of hybrid fish Chrosomus eos-neogaeus to the genetic diversity of one of its parental species, Chrosomus eos.Entities:
Keywords: Chrosomus eos-neogaeus; Gynogenesis; Host-parasite; Local hybridization events; Population genetics; Spatial autocorrelation; Sperm-dependence
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27600616 PMCID: PMC5012089 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0754-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Distribution of individuals from C. eos-neogaeus complex. a Map of Southern Quebec (Canada) where C. eos, C. neogaeus and/or hybrid C. eos-neogaeus individuals were detected (refer to Additional file 1 for the complete list of sampled sites). b Lineage distribution in West- and East-Qc. Sites follow the same order than Additional file 1; circle areas refer to the relative abundance of lineages within a given site; horizontal lines connect lineages that are found in sites distant by more than 7 km
Fig. 2Relationships among hybrid lineages. Neighbor-Joining tree inferred from clonal distances calculated from microsatellite loci among the consensus genotypes of 26 hybrid lineages. Lineages are identified according to mitochondrial haplotypes (A or B), regions (asterisk refers to West-Qc) and C. eos alleles at PEG1/MEST locus (underlined or not)
Fig. 3Lineages richness of West-Qc and East-Qc. Mean lineages accumulation curve according to sampled sites and standard deviation were estimated according to random permutations without replacement [95]
Fig. 4Mantel correlograms of the distribution of the hybrid lineages and C. eos. Jaccard distance and Cavalli-Sforza and Edward’s DCE genetic distance were used to assess the differences among sites respectively for hybrid lineages and C. eos populations. Straight line distance in (a) West-Qc and (b) East-Qc and waterway distance in (c) West-Qc and (d) East-Qc. Stars indicate significant autocorrelation values: ***, P < 0.001; **, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05 after Holm corrections
Genetic diversity in hybrid Chrosomus eos-neogaeus and in the sexual species Chrosomus eos between West-Qc and East-Qc regions
| Hybrids | |||||
| N sites (n) | N lineages | α-diversity | β-diversity | ||
| West-Qc | 29 (346) | 6 | 1.38 | 2.30 | |
| East-Qc | 27 (340) | 36 | 4.35 | 15.68 | |
| Total | 56 (686) | 41 | 1.82 | 22.51 | |
|
| |||||
| N sites (n) | k | HS | FST | ρST | |
| West-Qc | 7 (132) | 23.33 | 0.8653 | 0.0740 | 0.2302 |
| East-Qc | 9 (118) | 25.27 | 0.8913 | 0.0327 | 0.0734 |
| Total | 16 (250) | 28.33 | 0.8799 | 0.0579 | 0.1663 |
Number of sites and total number of individuals analysed is provided. For hybrids, diversity is represented by the number of lineages as well as α- and β-diversity. Diversity of the sexual species is given in number of alleles (k), mean of Nei’s gene diversity, FST and ρST
Fig. 5Results of principal component analysis of C. eos population genetics. Open and black circles refer to populations of West-Qc and East-Qc respectively. Only the most divergent populations are identified
Results of the assignment of hybrid lineages to the Chrosomus eos populations
Assignment score of the C. eos genotype for the 15 hybrid lineages detected to a given C. eos population (Additional file 1). Shaded indicated site(s) where hybrid lineage was detected. Bold number refers to a probability of 100 % that a given lineage belongs to a reference population