Joshua Jeong1, Dana Charles McCoy2, Aisha K Yousafzai3, Carmel Salhi4, Günther Fink5. 1. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; jjeong@mail.harvard.edu. 2. Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; and. 4. Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Few studies have examined the relationship between paternal stimulation and children's growth and development, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of paternal stimulation and to assess whether paternal stimulation was associated with early child growth and development. METHODS: Data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys rounds 4 and 5 were combined across 38 LMICs. The sample comprised 87 286 children aged 3 and 4 years. Paternal stimulation was measured by the number of play and learning activities (up to 6) a father engaged in with his child over the past 3 days. Linear regression models were used to estimate standardized mean differences in height-for-age z-scores and Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) z-scores across 3 levels of paternal stimulation, after controlling for other caregivers' stimulation and demographic covariates. RESULTS: A total of 47.8% of fathers did not engage in any stimulation activities, whereas 6.4% of fathers engaged in 5 or 6 stimulation activities. Children whose fathers were moderately engaged in stimulation (1-4 activities) showed ECDI scores that were 0.09 SD (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.12 to -0.06) lower than children whose fathers were highly engaged; children whose fathers were unengaged showed ECDI scores that were 0.14 SD lower (95% CI: -0.17 to -0.12). Neither moderate paternal stimulation nor lack of paternal stimulation was associated with height-for-age z-scores, relative to high stimulation. CONCLUSION: Increasing paternal engagement in stimulation is likely to improve early child development in LMICs.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Few studies have examined the relationship between paternal stimulation and children's growth and development, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of paternal stimulation and to assess whether paternal stimulation was associated with early child growth and development. METHODS: Data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys rounds 4 and 5 were combined across 38 LMICs. The sample comprised 87 286 children aged 3 and 4 years. Paternal stimulation was measured by the number of play and learning activities (up to 6) a father engaged in with his child over the past 3 days. Linear regression models were used to estimate standardized mean differences in height-for-age z-scores and Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) z-scores across 3 levels of paternal stimulation, after controlling for other caregivers' stimulation and demographic covariates. RESULTS: A total of 47.8% of fathers did not engage in any stimulation activities, whereas 6.4% of fathers engaged in 5 or 6 stimulation activities. Children whose fathers were moderately engaged in stimulation (1-4 activities) showed ECDI scores that were 0.09 SD (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.12 to -0.06) lower than children whose fathers were highly engaged; children whose fathers were unengaged showed ECDI scores that were 0.14 SD lower (95% CI: -0.17 to -0.12). Neither moderate paternal stimulation nor lack of paternal stimulation was associated with height-for-age z-scores, relative to high stimulation. CONCLUSION: Increasing paternal engagement in stimulation is likely to improve early child development in LMICs.
Authors: Joanna Maselko; Ashley K Hagaman; Lisa M Bates; Sonia Bhalotra; Pietro Biroli; John A Gallis; Karen O'Donnell; Siham Sikander; Elizabeth L Turner; Atif Rahman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2019-07-12 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Italo Lopez Garcia; Lia C H Fernald; Frances E Aboud; Ronald Otieno; Edith Alu; Jill E Luoto Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Eric Ngabireyimana; Christine Mutaganzwa; Catherine M Kirk; Ann C Miller; Kim Wilson; Evodia Dushimimana; Olivier Bigirumwami; Evelyne S Mukakabano; Fulgence Nkikabahizi; Hema Magge Journal: Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol Date: 2017-07-12