| Literature DB >> 27599575 |
A Riesgo1, R Pérez-Portela2, L Pita1, G Blasco1, P M Erwin3, S López-Legentil3.
Abstract
Recent episodes of mass mortalities in the Mediterranean Sea have been reported for the closely related marine sponges Ircinia fasciculata and Ircinia variabilis that live in sympatry. In this context, the assessment of the genetic diversity, bottlenecks and connectivity of these sponges has become urgent in order to evaluate the potential effects of mass mortalities on their latitudinal range. Our study aims to establish (1) the genetic structure, connectivity and signs of bottlenecks across the populations of I. fasciculata and (2) the hybridization levels between I. fasciculata and I. variabilis. To accomplish the first objective, 194 individuals of I. fasciculata from 12 locations across the Mediterranean were genotyped at 14 microsatellite loci. For the second objective, mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequences of 16 individuals from both species were analyzed along with genotypes at 12 microsatellite loci of 40 individuals coexisting in 3 Mediterranean populations. We detected strong genetic structure along the Mediterranean for I. fasciculata, with high levels of inbreeding in all locations and bottleneck signs in most locations. Oceanographic barriers like the Almeria-Oran front, North-Balearic front and the Ligurian-Thyrrenian barrier seem to be impeding gene flow for I. fasciculata, adding population divergence to the pattern of isolation by distance derived from the low dispersal abilities of sponge larvae. Hybridization between both species occurred in some populations that might be increasing genetic diversity and somewhat palliating the genetic loss caused by population decimation in I. fasciculata.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27599575 PMCID: PMC5117837 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.41
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heredity (Edinb) ISSN: 0018-067X Impact factor: 3.821
Details on collection sites and number of individuals per location for Ircinia fasciculata
| N | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAI | Es Caials, Cap de Creus, Spain | 42° 17' 06.99" N, 3° 17' 48.57" E | 14 | Western Mediterranean |
| ESC | L'Illa Mateua, L'Escala, Spain | 42° 6' 43.45" N, 3° 10' 23.68" E | 16 | Western Mediterranean |
| TOS | Mar Menuda, Tossa de Mar, Spain | 41° 43' 17.81" N, 2° 56' 23.09" E | 17 | Western Mediterranean |
| BLA | S'Agulla, Blanes, Spain | 41° 40' 54.16" N, 2° 48' 57.42" E | 24 | Western Mediterranean |
| CAL | Calafat, Tarragona, Spain | 40º 55' 16.93" N, 0º 50' 30.61" E | 12 | Western Mediterranean |
| ALI | Benidorm Island, Vilajoiosa, Alicante, Spain | 38º 30' 00.37" N, 0º 08' 12.38" E | 10 | Western Mediterranean |
| CAB | Illot L'Imperial, Cabrera National Park, Spain | 39º 07' 33.14" N, 2º 57' 34.32" E | 18 | Pre-Balear |
| COR | Reserve Naturelle de Scandola, Corsica, France | 42° 21′ 31.34" N, 8° 33′ 16.42" E | 6 | Pre-Balear |
| TAR | Las Palomas, Tarifa, Spain | 36° 0′ 42.74′′ N, 5° 35′ 48.17′′ W | 20 | Alboran Sea |
| GRA | Piedra del Hombre, Almuñécar, Granada, Spain | 36º 43' 16.0'' N, 3º 44' 13'' W | 20 | Alboran Sea |
| NAP | Bacoli, Napoli, Italy | 40° 47′ 39.84′′ N, 14° 5′ 16.16′′ E | 17 | Thyrrenian Sea |
| CRO | Hvar Island, Croatia | 43°78′ 22.92′′ N, 16° 43′ 38.42′′ E | 20 | Adriatic Sea |
Figure 1Assignment of individual genotypes of I. fasciculata to genetically similar clusters (K) as inferred by STRUCTURE for all studied locations with (a) K=2 and (b) K=5. (c) Pie frequency charts showing percentage of populations assigned to each of the five clusters represented in (b) for all locations. Gray color is applied to the percentage of individuals that were assigned to more than one cluster. Pre-Bal, Pre-Balear islands; Thyrre, Thyrrenian Sea; Adria, Adriatic Sea. A full color version of this figure is available at the Heredity journal online.
Descriptors of genetic diversity for all 12 locations of Ircinia fasciculata using the data set containing 14 loci and the corrected data set with only 9 loci
| N | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAR | 17 | 5.857 | 7.111 | 4.683 | 4.666 | 1.071 | 0.778 | 0.587 | 0.621 | 0.643 | 0.64 | 0.12 | 0.016 | *** | NS |
| GRA | 20 | 5.857 | 5.556 | 4.129 | 3.918 | 0.786 | 0.778 | 0.482 | 0.524 | 0.613 | 0.595 | 0.245 | 0.125 | *** | NS |
| CAI | 14 | 5.928 | 5.667 | 4.683 | 4.255 | 1.071 | 0.444 | 0.724 | 0.738 | 0.652 | 0.619 | −0.074 | −0.222 | * | NS |
| ESC | 16 | 5.714 | 5.778 | 4.228 | 4.183 | 0.786 | 0.667 | 0.599 | 0.610 | 0.622 | 0.595 | 0.073 | −0.058 | * | NS |
| TOS | 17 | 6.357 | 5.889 | 4.192 | 3.944 | 0.857 | 0.778 | 0.686 | 0.699 | 0.609 | 0.565 | −0.097 | −0.221 | *** | NS |
| BLA | 24 | 6.857 | 6.444 | 4.169 | 4.055 | 0.429 | 0.556 | 0.638 | 0.676 | 0.625 | 0.604 | 0 | −0.142 | NS | NS |
| CAL | 12 | 7.285 | 7.556 | 5.315 | 5.424 | 0.857 | 0.778 | 0.659 | 0.645 | 0.695 | 0.682 | 0.096 | 0.031 | ** | NS |
| ALI | 10 | 5.428 | 5.444 | 4.507 | 4.506 | 0.429 | 0.556 | 0.614 | 0.644 | 0.648 | 0.632 | 0.106 | −0.056 | * | NS |
| CAB | 18 | 6.571 | 5.778 | 4.537 | 4.116 | 0.643 | 0.444 | 0.607 | 0.627 | 0.658 | 0.617 | 0.107 | −0.044 | *** | NS |
| COR | 6 | 3.857 | 3.889 | 3.857 | 3.889 | 0.143 | 0.222 | 0.655 | 0.722 | 0.611 | 0.608 | 0.02 | −0.233 | NS | NS |
| NAP | 20 | 7.928 | 8.333 | 4.876 | 5.069 | 0.786 | 0.889 | 0.607 | 0.648 | 0.672 | 0.694 | 0.126 | 0.013 | *** | NS |
| CRO | 20 | 8.000 | 8.111 | 4.737 | 4.735 | 1.500 | 1.778 | 0.648 | 0.691 | 0.655 | 0.638 | 0.039 | −0.103 | NS | NS |
Abbreviations: A, number of alleles; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; He, expected heterozygosity; Ho, observed heterozygosity; HWE, deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; N, number of individuals; NS, not significant; pA, number of private alleles; Pop., population; rA, number of alleles after rarefaction.
*P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.
Figure 2IBD analyses in I. fasciculata for (a) all sites and (b) only Western Mediterranean and Pre-Balear sites.
Figure 3Detection of barriers to gene flow in I. fasciculata across the Mediterranean Sea. (a) Barriers detected by software BARRIER ranked a to c in order of magnitude. (b) Map of the Mediterranean seawater circulation indicating major fronts and oceanographic barriers previously known in the Mediterranean. Note that sampling locations for I. fasciculata are indicated in the map.
Figure 4Subdivision of the I. fasciculata sites according to DAPC analysis for (a) all areas and (b) only Western Mediterranean and Pre-Balear sites.
Details on the results of the analysis of the molecular variance (AMOVA) performed using three groups for the collection sites of Ircinia fasciculata: Alboran Sea (TAR and GRA), Western Mediterranean (CAI, ESC, TOS, BLA, CAL and ALI), Pre-Balear islands (CAB and COR), Thyrrenan Sea (NAP) and Adriatic Sea (CRO)
| P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 18.7940 | 0.0427 | 1.9200 | 0.01923 | |
| Among populations within groups | 38.5160 | 0.0765 | 3.4500 | 0.03516 | |
| Among individuals within populations | 348.9400 | −0.1818 | −8.2000 | −0.08663 | 1.00000 |
| Within individuals | 442.5000 | 2.2809 | 102.8300 | 2.28093 | 0.99496 |
See Table 1 for full name of locations. Significant P-values are in bold.
Figure 5Population assignment of individuals and last-generation migrants in I. fasciculata. (a) Number of individuals assigned to each population for all sampling locations. (b) Number of last-generation migrants (indicated in percentage of population). The original location of migrants (origin) is color coded following the same scheme as in DAPC of Figure 4a. A full color version of this figure is available at the Heredity journal online.
Results of the Bottleneck analysis for the 12 locations (Loc) of Ircinia fasciculata
| P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAI | 28.00 | 5.93 | 0.67649 | 0.105687 | 0.459598 | 0.059423 | 0.153783 | 0.292739 | 0.178772 | 0.357544 | 0.403870 | 0.807739 | 0.975281 | 0.057983 | |
| ALI | 19.57 | 5.43 | 0.68338 | 0.358475 | 0.067512 | 0.060697 | 0.344748 | 0.011027 | 0.500000 | 1.000.000 | 0.903137 | 0.216553 | 0.987732 | 0.029541 | |
| COR | 12.00 | 3.86 | 0.66667 | 0.019651 | 0.424299 | 0.028106 | 0.106599 | 0.014771 | 0.029541 | 0.052002 | 0.104004 | ||||
| CAB | 34.14 | 6.57 | 0.67806 | 0.54355 | 0.06084 | 0.424557 | 0.018419 | 0.291504 | 0.583008 | 0.903137 | 0.216553 | 0.999420 | |||
| BLA | 47.86 | 6.86 | 0.63841 | 0.249174 | 0.342223 | 0.47137 | 0.380432 | 0.760864 | 0.821228 | 0.390991 | 0.997864 | ||||
| ESC | 29.29 | 5.71 | 0.64423 | 0.549849 | 0.160654 | 0.317263 | 0.129642 | 0.231567 | 0.463135 | 0.852112 | 0.325806 | 0.997864 | |||
| CAL | 23.86 | 7.29 | 0.72507 | 0.545963 | 0.302962 | 0.450574 | 0.064873 | 0.334900 | 0.669800 | 0.866211 | 0.295776 | 0.991699 | 0.020264 | ||
| TOS | 33.43 | 6.36 | 0.62750 | 0.453395 | 0.528966 | 0.021274 | 0.11262 | 0.665100 | 0.714844 | 0.729187 | 0.583008 | 0.993286 | 0.016602 | ||
| TAR | 32.43 | 7.07 | 0.66405 | 0.543737 | 0.161753 | 0.143488 | 0.768433 | 0.501587 | 0.947998 | 0.118896 | 0.999420 | ||||
| GRA | 34.86 | 5.86 | 0.63206 | 0.361832 | 0.176926 | 0.169848 | 0.408537 | 0.524231 | 1.000.000 | 0.932373 | 0.153076 | 0.975281 | 0.057983 | ||
| NAP | 37.00 | 7.93 | 0.69106 | 0.549009 | 0.067966 | 0.138564 | 0.451599 | 0.903198 | 0.923462 | 0.172607 | 0.997864 | ||||
| CRO | 38.14 | 8.00 | 0.67319 | 0.322208 | 0.062244 | 0.185037 | 0.548401 | 0.951538 | 0.982361 | 0.041870 | 0.999908 | ||||
Abbreviations: He, expected heterozygosity; IAM, infinite allele model; k, number of alleles; N, sample size; SMM, stepwise mutation model; TPM, two-phase model.
See Table 1 for full name of locations. Significant P-values are in bold.
Figure 6Hybridization patterns in I. variabilis and I. fasciculata. (a) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic phylogeny based on the COI sequences from the genus Ircinia with bootstrap values (above nodes) and posterior probabilities (below nodes) mapped on shared clades between maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses. Support values over 70 are located over each node. Sequences obtained in this study appear in bold letters. The abbreviations for sampling sites can be found in Table 1. (b) TCS haplotype network for I. fasciculata. (c) DAPC graphical representation of population differentiation in three locations (TOS, COR and CAB) containing both species (I. variabilis and I. fasciculata) using microsatellites. (d) STRUCTURE output of individual assignment to five clusters (K=5) in three locations (TOS, COR and CAB) containing both species (I. variabilis and I. fasciculata) using microsatellites.