Literature DB >> 27599248

Lung cancer screening: latest developments and unanswered questions.

Carlijn M van der Aalst1, Kevin Ten Haaf2, Harry J de Koning2.   

Abstract

The US National Lung Screening Trial showed that individuals randomly assigned to screening with low-dose CT scans had 20% lower lung cancer mortality than did those screened with conventional chest radiography. On the basis of a review of the literature and a modelling study, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual screening for lung cancer for individuals aged 55-80 years who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and either currently smoke or quit smoking within the past 15 years. However, the balance between benefits and harms of lung cancer screening is still greatly debated. The large number of false-positive results and the potential for overdiagnosis are causes for concern. Some investigators suggest the ratio between benefits and harms could be improved through various means. Nevertheless, many questions remain with regard to the implementation of lung cancer screening. This paper highlights the latest developments in CT lung cancer screening and provides an overview of the main unanswered questions.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27599248     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30200-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


  26 in total

1.  Controlled settings for lung cancer screening: why do they matter? Considerations for referring clinicians.

Authors:  A Bharmal; A Crosskill; S Lam; H Bryant
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Establishing a Cohort and a Biorepository to Identify Biomarkers for Early Detection of Lung Cancer: The Nashville Lung Cancer Screening Trial Cohort.

Authors:  Dhairya A Lakhani; Sheau-Chiann Chen; Sanja Antic; Anel Muterspaugh; Christine Cook; Nancy Liu; Hina Shujat; Sophie Jouan; Brandon Winston; Kim Fields; Janelle Wenstrup; Sara L Block; Amy Hinton; Alexandra Miller; Sarah Atmajoana; John T Helton; Khushbu Patel; Aneri B Balar; Katrina Brewer; Subodh Nag; Rajbir Singh; Anthony Disher; Luis Huerta; Richard Fremont; Otis Rickman; Heidi Chen; Rosana Eisenberg; Kim L Sandler; Alexis Paulson; Ronald C Walker; Chirayu Shah; Gary T Smith; Bennett Landman; Stephen Deppen; Eric L Grogan; Melinda C Aldrich; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-07

3.  Identification of Candidates for Longer Lung Cancer Screening Intervals Following a Negative Low-Dose Computed Tomography Result.

Authors:  Hilary A Robbins; Christine D Berg; Li C Cheung; Anil K Chaturvedi; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Selecting high-risk individuals for lung cancer screening; the use of risk prediction models vs. simplified eligibility criteria.

Authors:  Rudolf Kaaks; Anika Hüsing; Renée T Fortner
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-10

Review 5.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: a world-wide view.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

6.  LncRNA ATB promotes the proliferation and metastasis of lung cancer via activation of the p38 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Lei Wei; Tao Wu; Ping He; Jun-Lei Zhang; Wei Wu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Lung cancer LDCT screening and mortality reduction - evidence, pitfalls and future perspectives.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; ShiYuan Liu; Marjolein A Heuvelmans; Joan E Walter; John K Field
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Ten-year results of the Multicentric Italian Lung Detection trial demonstrate the safety and efficacy of biennial lung cancer screening.

Authors:  U Pastorino; N Sverzellati; S Sestini; M Silva; F Sabia; M Boeri; A Cantarutti; G Sozzi; G Corrao; A Marchianò
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Risk-Targeted Lung Cancer Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Vaibhav Kumar; Joshua T Cohen; David van Klaveren; Djøra I Soeteman; John B Wong; Peter J Neumann; David M Kent
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography at a tertiary hospital in Anhui, China and secondary analysis of trial data.

Authors:  Wulin Shan; Zhaowu Chen; Donghua Wei; Ming Li; Liting Qian
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.