Literature DB >> 27599017

The effects of aging on the interaction between reinforcement learning and attention.

Angela Radulescu1, Reka Daniel1, Yael Niv1.   

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) in complex environments relies on selective attention to uncover those aspects of the environment that are most predictive of reward. Whereas previous work has focused on age-related changes in RL, it is not known whether older adults learn differently from younger adults when selective attention is required. In 2 experiments, we examined how aging affects the interaction between RL and selective attention. Younger and older adults performed a learning task in which only 1 stimulus dimension was relevant to predicting reward, and within it, 1 "target" feature was the most rewarding. Participants had to discover this target feature through trial and error. In Experiment 1, stimuli varied on 1 or 3 dimensions and participants received hints that revealed the target feature, the relevant dimension, or gave no information. Group-related differences in accuracy and RTs differed systematically as a function of the number of dimensions and the type of hint available. In Experiment 2 we used trial-by-trial computational modeling of the learning process to test for age-related differences in learning strategies. Behavior of both young and older adults was explained well by a reinforcement-learning model that uses selective attention to constrain learning. However, the model suggested that older adults restricted their learning to fewer features, employing more focused attention than younger adults. Furthermore, this difference in strategy predicted age-related deficits in accuracy. We discuss these results suggesting that a narrower filter of attention may reflect an adaptation to the reduced capabilities of the reinforcement learning system. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27599017     DOI: 10.1037/pag0000112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  8 in total

1.  Probabilistic Learning by Positive and Negative Reinforcement in Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Authors:  Lucas S LaFreniere; Michelle G Newman
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19

2.  Rumination Derails Reinforcement Learning with Possible Implications for Ineffective Behavior.

Authors:  Peter Hitchcock; Evan Forman; Nina Rothstein; Fengqing Zhang; John Kounios; Yael Niv; Chris Sims
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-11-01

3.  Intact Reinforcement Learning But Impaired Attentional Control During Multidimensional Probabilistic Learning in Older Adults.

Authors:  Reka Daniel; Angela Radulescu; Yael Niv
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Using Computational Modeling to Capture Schizophrenia-Specific Reinforcement Learning Differences and Their Implications on Patient Classification.

Authors:  Andra Geana; Deanna M Barch; James M Gold; Cameron S Carter; Angus W MacDonald; J Daniel Ragland; Steven M Silverstein; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-04-18

5.  Reinforcement learning as an intermediate phenotype in psychosis? Deficits sensitive to illness stage but not associated with polygenic risk of schizophrenia in the general population.

Authors:  Marcella Montagnese; Franziska Knolle; Joost Haarsma; Juliet D Griffin; Alex Richards; Petra E Vertes; Beatrix Kiddle; Paul C Fletcher; Peter B Jones; Michael J Owen; Peter Fonagy; Edward T Bullmore; Raymond J Dolan; Michael Moutoussis; Ian M Goodyer; Graham K Murray
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  A comparison of reinforcement learning models of human spatial navigation.

Authors:  Qiliang He; Jancy Ling Liu; Lou Eschapasse; Elizabeth H Beveridge; Thackery I Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Topographic organization of the human caudate functional connectivity and age-related changes with resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Jonathan F O'Rawe; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-23

8.  Salience and default-mode network connectivity during threat and safety processing in older adults.

Authors:  Lars Marstaller; Samuel Fynes-Clinton; Hana Burianová; David C Reutens
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.038

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.