Literature DB >> 27598905

Orthodontic treatment stability predictors: A retrospective longitudinal study.

Paloma González-Gil de Bernabé, José María Montiel-Company, Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo, Jose Luis Gandía-Franco, Carlos Bellot-Arcís.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine medium- to long-term orthodontic treatment stability and its possible association with certain variables.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective longitudinal study of 70 postretention patients, the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was measured at the start (T1) and end (T2) of treatment and between 4 and 10 years afterwards (T3). The stability was considered absolute when the T2 and T3 values were identical and relative when the difference was within the ±5 range.
RESULTS: Among the 70 patients, 65.8% were female and 34.2% were male. Their mean age was 14.5 years. The mean treatment length was 2.4 years. The mean retention phase was 3.3 years. The mean pre- and posttreatment PAR scores were 29.8 (T1) and 6.3 (T2). The mean T1-T2 difference was 23.6. The mean T2-T3 difference was -0.39.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the study, 7.1% presented absolute stability and 68.6% presented relative stability. Lower anterior segment alignment and overbite were the most unstable occlusal features and tended to worsen. Fixed retainer (odds ratio [OR] 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.98) as a protective factor and years without retention (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.03-1.68) as a risk factor are predictor variables of instability in the case of lower anterior segment alignment. The PAR value at the end of treatment (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.08-1.54) and extractions (OR 4.76; 95% CI 1.05-21.6) before treatment are predictors for midline instability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follow-up study; Long-term stability; Orthodontic retainer and retention; Relapse; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27598905     DOI: 10.2319/053116-435.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  5 in total

1.  British Orthodontic Society's initiative on orthodontic retention, A GDP's perspective.

Authors:  P V Mc Crory
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Orthodontic Class II:1 treatment-efficiency and outcome quality of Herbst-multibracket appliance therapy.

Authors:  N Bock; J Ruehl; S Ruf
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Raloxifene administration enhances retention in an orthodontic relapse model.

Authors:  Niloufar Azami; Po-Jung Chen; Shivam Mehta; Zana Kalajzic; Eliane H Dutra; Ravindra Nanda; Sumit Yadav
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Orthodontic retention and the role of the general dental practitioner.

Authors:  Charlotte Molyneaux; Jonathan R Sandy; Anthony J Ireland
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Cancer survivors present significantly lower long-term stability of orthodontic treatment: a prospective case-control study.

Authors:  Maria Mitus-Kenig; Marcin Derwich; Ewa Czochrowska; Elzbieta Pawlowska
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.075

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.