| Literature DB >> 27598889 |
Laura Cristina Multini1,2, André Barretto Bruno Wilke1, Lincoln Suesdek2,3, Mauro Toledo Marrelli1,2.
Abstract
Although Aedes fluviatilis is an anthropophilic mosquito found abundantly in urban environments, its biology, epidemiological potential and genetic characteristics are poorly understood. Climate change and urbanization processes that result in environmental modifications benefit certain anthropophilic mosquito species such as Ae. fluviatilis, greatly increasing their abundance in urban areas. To gain a better understanding of whether urbanization processes modulate the genetic structure of this species in the city of São Paulo, we used eight microsatellite loci to genetically characterize Ae. fluviatilis populations collected in nine urban parks in the city of São Paulo. Our results show that there is high gene flow among the populations of this species, heterozygosity deficiency and low genetic structure and that the species may have undergone a recent population expansion. There are two main hypotheses to explain these findings: (i) Ae. fluviatilis populations have undergone a population expansion as a result of urbanization; and (ii) as urbanization of the city of São Paulo occurred recently and was quite intense, the structuring of these populations cannot be observed yet, apart from in the populations of Ibirapuera and Piqueri parks, where the first signs of structuring have appeared. We believe that the expansion found in Ae. fluviatilis populations is probably correlated with the unplanned urbanization of the city of São Paulo, which transformed green areas into urbanized areas, as well as the increasing population density in the city.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27598889 PMCID: PMC5012556 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162328
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Aedes fluviatilis sampling locations in the city of São Paulo.
Aedes fluviatilis sampling information.
| Population | Coordinates | Number of | Females used | Collection year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burle Marx | 23°37’54”S 46°43’16”W | 1,264 (28.5%) | 30 | 2012/2013 |
| Ibirapuera | 23°35’14”S 46°39’27”W | 247 (9.5%) | 30 | 2011/2012 |
| Piqueri | 23°31’40”S 46°34’14”W | 1,104 (12%) | 30 | 2012/2013 |
| Previdência | 23°34’49”S 46°43’33”W | 157 (7%) | 30 | 2012/2013 |
| Santo Dias | 23°39’50”S 46°46’23”W | 231 (10%) | 30 | 2011/2012 |
| Shangrilá | 23°45’41”S 46°40’06”W | 1,006 (15%) | 30 | 2011/2012 |
| Alfredo Volpi | 23°35’16”S 46°42’09”W | 151 (12.5%) | 30 | 2011/2012 |
| Chico Mendes | 23°30’24”S 46°25’44”W | 151 (3%) | 30 | 2011/2012 |
| Carmo | 23°35’04”S 46°27’47”W | 76 (7%) | 30 | 2011/2012 |
*Number of Aedes fluviatilis specimens as a percentage of the total number of mosquitoes collected (Medeiros-Sousa et al., unpublished data).
Pairwise FST* estimates for Aedes fluviatilis populations.
| - | 0.050189 | 0.040068 | 0.019847 | 0.031485 | 0.026849 | 0.027445 | 0.008033 | 0.007975 | |
| - | 0.000709 | 0.028792 | 0.029321 | 0.035701 | 0.034906 | 0.045820 | 0.040354 | ||
| 0 | - | 0.016828 | 0.023858 | 0.025561 | 0.020121 | 0.025722 | 0.024515 | ||
| 0 | - | 0.006230 | 0.006344 | 0.016797 | 0.006850 | 0.001337 | |||
| 0.00016 | - | 0.009239 | 0.025782 | 0.014845 | 0.013426 | ||||
| 0.00111 | - | 0.024413 | 0.018144 | 0.015420 | |||||
| 0.00263 | - | 0.009282 | 0.011423 | ||||||
| 0.00295 | 0 | 0.00208 | - | 0.000215 | |||||
| 0 | 0 | 0.00075 | 0 | - |
*Below the diagonal: FST values without correction for null alleles. Significant values are in bold. Above the diagonal: FreeNA corrected FST values.
Fig 2Genetic-distance dendrogram for Aedes fluviatilis.
Fig 3Bayesian analysis of structure for all Aedes fluviatilis populations showing the subdivision of individuals k = 2 (A), k = 4 (B) and k = 9 (C).
Each of the 270 individuals from nine populations is represented by a vertical line divided into different colored segments. The length of each segment represents the probability of the individual belonging to the genetic cluster represented by that color.
Aedes fluviatilis heterozygosity tests.
| Burle Marx | Ibirapuera | Piqueri | Previdência | Santo Dias | Shangrilá | Alfredo Volpi | Chico Mendes | Carmo | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||
| 0.07813 | 0.28906 | 0.28906 | 0.23047 | 0.59375 | 0.05469 | 0.23438 |
Number of loci exhibiting heterozygosity excess (He) and expected heterozygosity based on the number of observed alleles (Heq) under the SMM model. Significant P-values for heterozygosity deficiency are in bold.