Lauren N Gase1, Taylor Schooley, Meredith Lee, Sierra Rotakhina, John Vick, Julia Caplan. 1. Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California (Mss Gase and Schooley); Health in All Policies Task Force, Office of Health Equity, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California (Ms Lee); Washington State Board of Health, Olympia, Washington (Ms Rotakhina); Division of Epidemiology and Research, Metro Nashville Public Health Department, Nashville, Tennessee (Dr Vick); and Health in All Policies, Public Health Institute, Sacramento, California (Ms Caplan).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To address the social determinants of health, an increasing number of public health practitioners are implementing Health in All Policies initiatives aimed at increasing cross-sectoral collaboration and integrating health considerations into decisions made by "nonhealth" sectors. Despite the growth in practice nationally and internationally, evaluation of Health in All Policies is a relatively new field. To help inform evaluation of Health in All Policies initiatives in the United States, this study sought to develop a practice-grounded approach, including a logic model and a set of potential indicators, which could be used to describe and assess Health in All Policies activities, outputs, and outcomes. DESIGN: Methods included (a) a review of the literature on current Health in All Policies approaches, practices, and evaluations; and (b) consultation with experts with substantive knowledge in implementing or evaluating Health in All Policies initiatives. Feedback from experts was obtained through individual (n = 11) and group (n = 14) consultation. RESULTS: The logic model depicts a range of potential inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes of Health in All Policies initiatives; example indicators for each component of the logic model are provided. Case studies from California, Washington, and Nashville highlight emerging examples of Health in All Policies evaluation and the ways in which local context and goals inform evaluation efforts. CONCLUSION: The tools presented in this article synthesize concepts present in the emerging literature on Health in All Policies implementation and evaluation. Practitioners and researchers can use the tools to facilitate dialogue among stakeholders, clarify assumptions, identify how they will assess progress, and implement data-driven ways to improve their Health in All Policies work.
OBJECTIVE: To address the social determinants of health, an increasing number of public health practitioners are implementing Health in All Policies initiatives aimed at increasing cross-sectoral collaboration and integrating health considerations into decisions made by "nonhealth" sectors. Despite the growth in practice nationally and internationally, evaluation of Health in All Policies is a relatively new field. To help inform evaluation of Health in All Policies initiatives in the United States, this study sought to develop a practice-grounded approach, including a logic model and a set of potential indicators, which could be used to describe and assess Health in All Policies activities, outputs, and outcomes. DESIGN: Methods included (a) a review of the literature on current Health in All Policies approaches, practices, and evaluations; and (b) consultation with experts with substantive knowledge in implementing or evaluating Health in All Policies initiatives. Feedback from experts was obtained through individual (n = 11) and group (n = 14) consultation. RESULTS: The logic model depicts a range of potential inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes of Health in All Policies initiatives; example indicators for each component of the logic model are provided. Case studies from California, Washington, and Nashville highlight emerging examples of Health in All Policies evaluation and the ways in which local context and goals inform evaluation efforts. CONCLUSION: The tools presented in this article synthesize concepts present in the emerging literature on Health in All Policies implementation and evaluation. Practitioners and researchers can use the tools to facilitate dialogue among stakeholders, clarify assumptions, identify how they will assess progress, and implement data-driven ways to improve their Health in All Policies work.
Authors: Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani; Zeynab Sedoghi; Mohammad Hossein Mehrolhassani; Vahid Yazdi-Feyzabadi Journal: Health Promot Int Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 2.483
Authors: Fiona Haigh; Elizabeth Harris; Ben Harris-Roxas; Fran Baum; Andrew L Dannenberg; Mark F Harris; Helen Keleher; Lynn Kemp; Richard Morgan; Harrison Ng Chok; Jeff Spickett Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-10-03 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Andrew D Pinto; Agnes Molnar; Ketan Shankardass; Patricia J O'Campo; Ahmed M Bayoumi Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Fiona Haigh; Fran Baum; Andrew L Dannenberg; Mark F Harris; Ben Harris-Roxas; Helen Keleher; Lynn Kemp; Richard Morgan; Harrison N G Chok; Jeff Spickett; Elizabeth Harris Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Prajakta Adsul; David Chambers; Heather M Brandt; Maria E Fernandez; Shoba Ramanadhan; Essie Torres; Jennifer Leeman; Barbara Baquero; Linda Fleischer; Cam Escoffery; Karen Emmons; Montserrat Soler; April Oh; Ariella R Korn; Stephanie Wheeler; Rachel C Shelton Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2022-06-03
Authors: Yeeli Mui; Jessica C Jones-Smith; Rachel L J Thornton; Keshia Pollack Porter; Joel Gittelsohn Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 3.390