Literature DB >> 27598684

Exploration, Sampling, And Reconstruction of Free Energy Surfaces with Gaussian Process Regression.

Letif Mones1, Noam Bernstein2, Gábor Csányi1.   

Abstract

Practical free energy reconstruction algorithms involve three separate tasks: biasing, measuring some observable, and finally reconstructing the free energy surface from those measurements. In more than one dimension, adaptive schemes make it possible to explore only relatively low lying regions of the landscape by progressively building up the bias toward the negative of the free energy surface so that free energy barriers are eliminated. Most schemes use the final bias as their best estimate of the free energy surface. We show that large gains in computational efficiency, as measured by the reduction of time to solution, can be obtained by separating the bias used for dynamics from the final free energy reconstruction itself. We find that biasing with metadynamics, measuring a free energy gradient estimator, and reconstructing using Gaussian process regression can give an order of magnitude reduction in computational cost.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27598684     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  10 in total

1.  Neural networks-based variationally enhanced sampling.

Authors:  Luigi Bonati; Yue-Yu Zhang; Michele Parrinello
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Predicting electronic structure properties of transition metal complexes with neural networks.

Authors:  Jon Paul Janet; Heather J Kulik
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 9.825

3.  MolE8: finding DFT potential energy surface minima values from force-field optimised organic molecules with new machine learning representations.

Authors:  Sanha Lee; Kristaps Ermanis; Jonathan M Goodman
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 9.969

4.  Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems.

Authors:  John A Keith; Valentin Vassilev-Galindo; Bingqing Cheng; Stefan Chmiela; Michael Gastegger; Klaus-Robert Müller; Alexandre Tkatchenko
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Smoothed Biasing Forces Yield Unbiased Free Energies with the Extended-System Adaptive Biasing Force Method.

Authors:  Adrien Lesage; Tony Lelièvre; Gabriel Stoltz; Jérôme Hénin
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  The TensorMol-0.1 model chemistry: a neural network augmented with long-range physics.

Authors:  Kun Yao; John E Herr; David W Toth; Ryker Mckintyre; John Parkhill
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Kernel-Based Machine Learning for Efficient Simulations of Molecular Liquids.

Authors:  Christoph Scherer; René Scheid; Denis Andrienko; Tristan Bereau
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Importance of base-pair opening for mismatch recognition.

Authors:  Tomáš Bouchal; Ivo Durník; Viktor Illík; Kamila Réblová; Petr Kulhánek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Functional and Material Properties in Nanocatalyst Design: A Data Handling and Sharing Problem.

Authors:  Daniel Lach; Uladzislau Zhdan; Adam Smolinski; Jaroslaw Polanski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Machine-Learned Free Energy Surfaces for Capillary Condensation and Evaporation in Mesopores.

Authors:  Caroline Desgranges; Jerome Delhommelle
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.524

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.