| Literature DB >> 27597902 |
Yu-Ping Mo1, Hai-Jiang Yao2, Wei Lv3, Liang-Yu Song3, Hong-Tao Song4, Xiao-Chen Yuan5, Ying-Qiu Mao6, Quan-Kai Jing3, Su-Hua Shi7, Zhi-Gang Li3.
Abstract
In an effort to explore new, noninvasive treatment options for spinal cord injuries (SCI), this study investigated the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) for SCI rat models. SCI was induced by a modified Allen's weight-drop method. We investigated the response of EA at Dazhui (GV 14) and Mingmen (GV 4) acupoints to understand the effects and mechanisms of EA in neuroprotection and neuronal function recovery after SCI. BBB testing was used to detect motor function of rats' hind limbs among groups, and EA was shown to promote the recovery of SCI rats' motor function. Nissl staining showed a restored neural morphology and an increase in the quantity of neurons after EA. Also, the antiapoptosis role was exposed by TUNEL staining. Western blotting analysis was used to determine the protein expression of neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) in spinal cord tissue. Compared to the sham group, the expression levels of NT-3 were significantly decreased and EA was shown to upregulate the expression of NT-3. The present study suggests that the role of EA in neuroprotection and dorsal neuronal function recovery after SCI in rats, especially EA stimulation at GV 14 and GV 4, can greatly promote neuronal function recovery, which may result from upregulating the expression of NT-3.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27597902 PMCID: PMC4997063 DOI: 10.1155/2016/2371875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1(a) Modified Allen's weight-drop apparatus; (b) before and after SCI; (c) the hind limbs condition of each group after SCI.
Behavioral testing after SCI in the following groups (n = 11 per group): sham, control, and EA. p < 0.01, as compared with sham group; ## p < 0.01, as compared with control group (S: sham group; C: control group; EA: electroacupuncture group).
| Group | BBB scores | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | |
| S | 21 ± 0.00 | 21 ± 0.00 | 21 ± 0.00 |
| C | 0.6364 ± 0.15 | 1.3636 ± 0.15 | 2.0909 ± 0.21 |
| EA | 0.6364 ± 0.15 | 2.0909 ± 0.25 | 4.0909 ± 0.21 |
Figure 2Neuronal conditions were evaluated using Nissl staining (original magnification ×400, 1 : 50) in the following groups: sham, control, and EA group at 1 d, 3 d, and 7 d (S: sham group; C: control group; EA: electroacupuncture group).
Number of surviving neurons after SCI in the following groups (n = 6 per group): sham, control, and EA. p < 0.01, as compared with sham group; # p < 0.05; ## p < 0.01, as compared with control group (S: sham group; C: control group; EA: electroacupuncture group).
| Group | Number of survival neurons | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | |
| S | 39.67 ± 1.54 | 38.50 ± 1.34 | 37.33 ± 1.15 |
| C | 9.33 ± 1.12 | 16.50 ± 1.12 | 19.00 ± 0.97 |
| EA | 19.33 ± 1.52 | 21.00 ± 1.07 | 27.50 ± 1.38 |
Figure 3TUNEL staining (original magnification ×400, 1 : 50) identified apoptotic neurons in the following groups: sham, control, and EA group at 1 d, 3 d, and 7 d (S: sham group; C: control group; EA: electroacupuncture group).
The effects of EA on the inhibition of apoptotic cell death after SCI in the following groups (n = 6 per group): sham, control, and EA. p < 0.01, as compared with sham group; ## p < 0.01, as compared with control group (S: sham group; C: control group; EA: electroacupuncture group).
| Group | Apoptotic index | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | |
| S | 4.00 ± 1.87 | 5.00 ± 1.73 | 4.30 ± 1.15 |
| C | 27.40 ± 3.9 | 29.00 ± 4.58 | 20.00 ± 1.00 |
| EA | 14.00 ± 1.58 | 14.00 ± 1.00 | 12.60 ± 2.08 |
Figure 4Western blotting identified the expression of NT-3 in the following groups: sham, control, and EA group at 1 d, 3 d, and 7 d (1: sham group; 2: control group; 3: electroacupuncture group).
The effects of EA on the expression of NT-3 after SCI in the following groups (n = 5 per group): sham, control, and EA. p < 0.05, as compared with sham group; ## p < 0.01, as compared with control group (S: sham group; C: control group; EA: electroacupuncture group).
| Group | Relative expression of NT-3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | |
| S | 0.88 ± 0.21 | 1.09 ± 0.27 | 1.00 ± 0.08 |
| C | 0.67 ± 0.14 | 0.60 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.28 |
| EA | 0.80 ± 0.21 | 0.98 ± 0.05## | 1.10 ± 0.25## |