Literature DB >> 27596990

Cancer survivors' perspectives and experiences regarding behavioral determinants of return to work and continuation of work.

Saskia F A Duijts1,2, Martine P van Egmond1,3, Maxime Gits1, Allard J van der Beek1,3, Eveline M Bleiker2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Supportive interventions to enhance return to work (RTW) in cancer survivors hardly showed positive effects so far. Behavioral determinants might have to be considered in the development of interventions to achieve sustained employability. This study aimed to explore cancer survivors' perspectives and experiences regarding behavioral determinants of RTW and continuation of work.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this qualitative study, semi-structured telephone interviews were held with 28 cancer survivors. All participants were at working age, 1-2 years after diagnosis and employed at time of diagnosis. Thematic content analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Work turned out to be a meaningful aspect of cancer survivors' life, and most participants reported a positive attitude towards their job. Social support to RTW or to continue working was mainly received from family and friends, but pressure to RTW from the occupational physician was also experienced. Changes in expectations regarding work ability from negative to positive during the treatment process were observed. Those who applied active coping mechanisms felt equipped to deal with difficulties regarding work.
CONCLUSIONS: Behavioral determinants should be taken into account in the development of future interventions to support cancer survivors' RTW. However, the causal relationship still has to be determined. Implications for rehabilitation Factors influencing occupational motivation among cancer survivors need to be understood in more detail. Previous studies in non-cancer populations have demonstrated that behavioral determinants, such as a positive attitude towards work, high social support and self-efficacy may increase return to work rates or shorten the time to return to work. Addressing behavioral determinants in future development of work-related interventions for cancer survivors is essential in achieving sustained employability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer survivors; behavior; determinants; experiences; qualitative; return to work

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27596990     DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1219924

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  18 in total

1.  Factors influencing return to work of cancer survivors: a population-based study in Italy.

Authors:  Sara Paltrinieri; Massimo Vicentini; Elisa Mazzini; Elena Ricchi; Stefania Fugazzaro; Pamela Mancuso; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Stefania Costi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Return-to-Work Guidelines and Programs for Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors: An Initial Survey.

Authors:  Rachel B Salit; Stephanie J Lee; Linda J Burns; Bronwen E Shaw; Navneet S Majhail; Neel S Bhatt; William A Wood; Karen L Syrjala
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Change in the value of work after breast cancer: evidence from a prospective cohort.

Authors:  Elsa Caumette; Antonio Di Meglio; Inès Vaz-Luis; Cécile Charles; Julie Havas; Garazi Ruiz de Azua; Elise Martin; Laurence Vanlemmens; Suzette Delaloge; Sibille Everhard; Anne-Laure Martin; Asma Dhaini Merimeche; Olivier Rigal; Charles Coutant; Marion Fournier; Christelle Jouannaud; Patrick Soulie; Paul-Henri Cottu; Olivier Tredan; Gwenn Menvielle; Agnès Dumas
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Returning to Work After Cancer in Australia: What Facilitates a Positive Return to Work Experience?

Authors:  Gemma Skaczkowski; Akira Asahina; Carlene Wilson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

5.  Effectiveness of a Tailored Work-Related Support Intervention for Patients Diagnosed with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  M H W Frings-Dresen; A G E M de Boer; A C G N M Zaman; K M A J Tytgat; J H G Klinkenbijl; F C den Boer; M A Brink; J C Brinkhuis; D J Bruinvels; L C M Dol; P van Duijvendijk; P H J Hemmer; B Lamme; O J L Loosveld; M M Mok; T Rejda; H Rutten; A Schoorlemmer; D J Sonneveld; L P S Stassen; R P Veenstra; A van de Ven; E R Velzing
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-06

6.  Breaking the patientification process - through co-creation of care, using old arctic survival knowledge.

Authors:  Ulrika Sandén; Lars Harrysson; Hans Thulesius; Fredrik Nilsson
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2021-12

7.  Cancer-related impairments and functional limitations among long-term cancer survivors: Gaps and opportunities for clinical practice.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Grace B Campbell; Kathryn H Schmitz; Gabriel A Brooks; Anita J Kumar; Patricia A Ganz; Diane Von Ah
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 8.  The Intersection of Oncology Prognosis and Cancer Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sean Robinson Smith; Jasmine Yiqian Zheng
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2017-03-01

9.  Influence of significant others on work participation of individuals with chronic diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole C Snippen; Haitze J de Vries; Sylvia J van der Burg-Vermeulen; Mariët Hagedoorn; Sandra Brouwer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  [The problems of career (re)integration faced by cancer patients].

Authors:  Andrea Janßen; Sabine Schneider; Jens Stäudle; Jürgen Walther
Journal:  Onkologe (Berl)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 0.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.