Literature DB >> 27595691

Complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with drug-eluting stents.

Mineok Chang1, Jung-Min Ahn1, Nayoung Kim2, Pil Hyung Lee1, Jae-Hyung Roh1, Sung-Han Yoon1, Soo-Jin Kang1, Seung-Whan Lee1, Young-Hak Kim1, Cheol Whan Lee1, Seong-Wook Park1, Duk-Woo Park3, Seung-Jung Park1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of completeness of revascularization on adverse cardiovascular events remains unclear among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS: This analysis included consecutive patients with multivessel CAD, who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) during the period from January 1, 2003, through to December 31, 2013. We compared the outcomes in patients, who achieved complete (CR) versus incomplete revascularization (IR) at the time of PCI. The primary outcome was death from any cause. Secondary outcomes were the rates of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization. Propensity-score matching was used to assemble a cohort of patients with similar baseline characteristics.
RESULTS: Among 3901 patients with multivessel CAD treated with DES, 1402 pairs of similar propensity scores in each group of CR and IR were identified. At a median follow-up of 4.9 years (interquartile range, 2.4-7.5), IR was associated with a similar risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.80-1.32; P=.83) as compared with CR. IR was also associated with similar risks of stroke (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.76-2.09; P=.37) and repeat revascularization (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.93-1.41; P=.19), but associated with a higher risk of MI (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.08-3.19; P=.024) compared to CR.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with multivessel CAD treated with DES, as compared with CR, IR was associated with similar risk of death. However, IR was associated with a higher risk of MI during follow-up.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27595691     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

1.  Incomplete coronary revascularization: a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Lindsey L Saint; Spencer J Melby
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Completeness of revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yader Sandoval; Emmanouil S Brilakis; Santiago Garcia
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  To complete, or not to complete, that is the question of revascularization in percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for multivessel disease.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Tomo Ando; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Therapeutic angiogenesis with exosomal microRNAs: an effectual approach for the treatment of myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  Toktam Moghiman; Bita Barghchi; Seyed-Alireza Esmaeili; Mahmoud Mohammadzadeh Shabestari; Seyedeh Samaneh Tabaee; Amir Abbas Momtazi-Borojeni
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  Revascularization Strategies in STEMI with Multivessel Disease: Deciding on Culprit Versus Complete-Ad Hoc or Staged.

Authors:  Shalin Patel; Steven R Bailey
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Impact of completeness of revascularisation on long-term outcomes in patients with multivessel disease undergoing PCI: CR versus IR outcomes in multivessel CAD.

Authors:  Pravin Goel; Ankit Sahu; Manas Layek; Roopali Khanna; Prabhakar Mishra
Journal:  AsiaIntervention       Date:  2021-07

Review 7.  Impact of Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Vinayak Nagaraja; Sze-Yuan Ooi; James Nolan; Adrian Large; Mark De Belder; Peter Ludman; Rodrigo Bagur; Nick Curzen; Takashi Matsukage; Fuminobu Yoshimachi; Chun Shing Kwok; Colin Berry; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Clinical outcomes of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus one-stage percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Chieh-Shou Su; Ching-Hui Shen; Keng-Hao Chang; Chih-Hung Lai; Tsun-Jui Liu; Kuan-Ju Chen; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Yu-Wei Chen; Wen-Lieng Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Angiographic Complete versus Clinical Selective Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Heart Failure Patients with Multivessel Coronary Disease.

Authors:  Chieh-Yu Chang; Chun-Chi Chen; I-Chang Hsieh; Ming-Jer Hsieh; Cheng-Hung Lee; Dong-Yi Chen; Ming-Lung Tsai; Ming-Yun Ho; Jih-Kai Yeh; Yu-Chang Huang; Yu-Ying Lu; Chao-Yung Wang; Shang-Hung Chang; Ming-Shien Wen
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.