Literature DB >> 27595671

Comparison of under-five mortality for 2000, 2005 and 2011 surveys in Ethiopia.

Dawit G Ayele1, Temesgen T Zewotir2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Though the socio-economic situation of the Ethiopian household is improving along with the decrease in under-five child mortality. But, under-five mortality is still one of the major problems. Identification of the risk factors change over time which mismatches with the diminishing rate of under-five mortality is important to address the problems.
METHODS: The survey data used for this research was taken from three different Ethiopian Demographic and Health Surveys (2000, 2005 and 2011). This data was used to identify the effect of time varying under-five mortality risk factors. The Cox proportional hazard model was adapted for the analysis.
RESULTS: The effect of respondent's current age, age at first birth and educational level on the under-five mortality rate significantly diminishes in the recent surveys. On the other hand, the effect of the number of births in the last 5 years increases more in 2011 than in the earlier two surveys. Similarly, number of household members in the house and the number of under-five children in the house demonstrated a difference through years. Regarding total children ever born, child death is more for the year 2000 followed by 2005 and 2011.
CONCLUSION: Based on the study, our findings confirmed that under-five mortality is a serious problem in the country. The analysis displayed that the hazard of under-five mortality has a decreasing pattern in years. The result for regions showed that there was an increase in years for some of the regions. This research work gives necessary information to device improved teaching for family planning and children health care to change the child mortality circumstance in the country. Our study suggests that the impact of demographic characteristics and socio-economic factors on child mortality should account for their integral changes over time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baseline hazard function; Cross-sectional study; Demographic Health Survey (DHS); Hazard ratio; Survival function

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27595671      PMCID: PMC5011871          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3601-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


Background

The highest under-five mortality rate is found in Sub-Saharan countries when compared to other countries. This rate is about 7 times greater than WHO European Region [1, 2]. Even though various actions have been taken to decrease under-five mortality, most of the Sub-Saharan countries show very high under-five mortality rates. The rate is above 100 deaths per 1000 live births [3]. It is believed that child mortality rates have a considerable decrease in Ethiopia due to the progressive and consistent implementation of the Health interventions since 1960 [4]. Despite this implementation, under-five mortality rates show the highest trend in Ethiopia [5-7]. Furthermore, crude death rates have also significantly decreased over the past 10 years [8-10]. Based on available information, infant and under-five mortality have constant decrease over the past 25 years. In the last 10 years infant and under-five mortality showed a more pronounced reduction [11, 12]. In fact since 1990 progress in under-five mortality has been made in every region of the world [13]. Despite progress all over the world, the geographic divergence of child mortality continues, and parallels the prevalence of extreme poverty; the sub-Saharan countries have a high rate of births which is above 100 per 1000 live births [13]. Even though it is challenging to identify contributing relations between strategy, programme inputs and health impact, there are credible standards to recognise key policy and programme inputs. One of the reasons could be the implemented strategy to reduce under-five mortality [14] changes in the last 20 years. Nevertheless, such inferences emanate from pieces of cross-sectional studies but not from the longitudinal study. Likewise, we are aware that there are many cross-sectional studies on under-five mortality in Ethiopia and other countries [15-17]. These cross-sectional studies are incomplete in their capability to draw valid recommendations about any relationship or potential causality over time. Even then no comprehensive analysis over a definite region to include for global and/or local socioeconomic differences on the child mortality was conducted. In 2013, Negera et al. explained trends and differentials of infant and under-five mortality in Ethiopia. But this study mostly presented the descriptive analysis for the three EDHS surveys. The multivariate analysis which is presented in this research paper only shows the overall effects of child mortality for years 2000, 2005 and 2011. This study lacks the inclusion of the time effect in the investigation. Hence, this study attempts to give child mortality model with the reducing effect over time which is appropriate to find the effect of related socio-economic and demographic factors and covariates. Alternatively, the socio-economic and demographic factors can be classified as the mother’s characteristics (such as current age, age at 1st birth, highest educational level, number of under-five children, number of children ever born, number of live births in the last 5 years, current pregnancy status and religion), child specific characteristics (types of birth, gender of the child) and household characteristics (region, place of residence, family size) and environmental characteristics (toilet facility, fuel type, floor material, roof material and wall material) . The under-five mortality pattern is known to have a decreasing trend. Bearing this in mind fitting a survival analysis with the lifetime distributions of various investigated groups [16, 18] is one of the main problems in the study of life data. In most cases, the impact of different covariate variables on the lifetime as the dependent variable are modelled using regression models. Therefore, these models are an important part of survival analysis [19, 20]. This kind of model is known as the Cox regression model or the proportional hazards regression model [21]. Therefore, this study adapts the Cox proportional hazard model to assess the effect of socio-economic and demographic factors on the decreasing trend of child mortality over time.

Methods

Ethiopia is located in Eastern Africa which is classified as Sub-Saharan Africa. In 2000, Ethiopia conducted the first Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS). As a continuous study, EDHSs were conducted in 2005 and 2011. This study is a cross-sectional investigation administered at the household level periodically. These surveys consist of 540 to 624 selected enumeration areas (EA). The household listing was performed for each of selected EAs. 2000, 2005 and 2011 EDHS samples were designed to provide estimates for the health and demographic variables of interest for Ethiopia as a whole; urban and rural areas of Ethiopia and 11 geographical areas. For the survey, 14,642 households in 2000, 14,500 in 2005 and 17,817 households in 2011 were included in data collection. For 2000 and 2005, the 1994 Population and Housing Census and for 2011, the 2007 Population and Housing Census frames were used as the sampling frame [8-10]. Different socio-economic, demographic and geographic factors were examined in this study. 2000, 2005 and 2011 EDHS sample was considered to make available estimates for the health and demographic variables at country level and for the urban and rural area of Ethiopia and all the 11 administrative provinces, called regions. The outcome of interest for this study is child death before reaching age five. According to the Millennium Development Goal (MDG), one of the goals is to reduce under-five mortality. Questions related to the advances to the MDGs affecting equity. To identify the effects, it is important to examine through a variety of situations, and variation in child mortality between the poorest and the richest changes as development is made to the MDG. Therefore, the relationship between socioeconomic status and child health has been an area of increasing interest [22-24]. Since the socio-economic variables are related to poverty, the following variables have been included in the study. The explanatory variables were the socio-economic status, demographic and geographic variables including year of survey, age of the women, age at first birth, age at first sex, place of residence, highest educational level of the mother, religion, family size, number of under-five children, number of children ever born, current pregnancy status, birth in the last 5 years, types of birth (single or twin or multiple births), gender of the child, toilet facility, type of fuel, floor material, roof material and wall material. The unit of analysis for this study was considered to be children. Cox proportional hazard regression models are useful to access the effects of the life-time associated factors on the hazard function. These models have a significant role in the study of the life-time data. In the model, the continuous random variable represents the lifetime of an individual (t), and the vector of explanatory variables related to (X), when X is given under the proportional hazard hypothesis. Therefore, for x, x, . . . , x be the values of p covariates X1, X2, . . . , X. According to the Cox regression model, the hazard function is given as follows:where ψ(X) = exp(∑βx), β = (β1, β2, . . . , β) is a 1 × p vector of regression parameters and h0(t) is the baseline hazard function at that time. The detailed explanation about the Cox proportional hazard regression model is well documented. This information can be accessed from different books and articles [18–21, 25, 26]. In survival analysis, there are different model diagnosis methods. Most of the diagnostic tests are based on various residuals results. The first model diagnosis tool is based on assessing martingale residual. This method is the default model diagnosis method and useful to assess the goodness of predictor variables. The other model diagnosis technique is based on the deviance residual. The deviance residual method uses the normalized transform from martingale residual. This method is useful to identify poorly predicted subjects. The Cox-Snell residual is also the other model diagnosis tool. This method can be used as the same as in parametric models. The plots of the cumulative hazard function of Cox-Snell residuals give a good strategy for checking goodness of fit of the model. To find the determinants of under-five mortality when several risk factors were taken into account the analyses were performed using the SAS procedure called PROC PHREG. The goodness of fitness of the model to the data was examined before any inference from the result. These model diagnostics techniques include distributional assumptions assessment; influence diagnostics; residuals and outliers diagnostics [26-28]. One important tool for examining the goodness of Cox’s regression model is the martingale residuals. Among different models, selecting a suitable model is very important in data analysis. For this purpose, for frailty models, AICs perform different model selection results. Therefore, for the data examined, AIC method appeared to be the best tool for model selection. Moreover, choosing the best model helps to handle confounding effects. For this reason, two stage of model building was used. Each of the predictor variables was fitted one at a time. From the model, significant covariates were remained in the model. Additionally, possible interaction effects between the socio-economic, demographic and geographic variables and year of the survey were added. This process is useful to avoid the difficulty of confounding effects. The P value used in this study is the probability of the observed result when the null hypothesis of the investigation is true. The p-value can also be expressed in terms of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is essentially true. In general, the P-value can be used as another way to rejection points to give the smallest level of significance for the null hypothesis to be rejected. If the P-value is small, it shows stronger evidence is in favour of the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, P-values can be obtained from using p-value tables, or using different statistical software or spreadsheets.

Result

Child mortality refers to the infant death and under-five children. From 2000, 2005 to 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey (EDHS), it was found that the infant mortality rate, the child mortality rate, and the under-five mortality rate shows a decline. For 2011, the infant mortality rate, the child mortality rate, and the under-five mortality rate was found to be 59 per 1000 live births, 31 per 1000 children surviving to age 1 year and 88 per 1000 live births respectively. Similarly, one in 11 Ethiopian children dies before the fifth birthday. Furthermore, for the 5-year period, neonatal mortality was 37 deaths per 1000 live births, and post-neonatal mortality was 22 deaths per 1000 live births. Before describing the model results, it is of interest to present the percentage of child mortality in relation to socio-economic, demographic and geographic categorical variables. The under-five children survival rate differs among the three surveys (P < 0.0001). Likewise, the under-five children survival/mortality rate differs by region (p < 0.0001) with Addis Ababa (92.9 %), the highest survival rate followed by Harari (87.9 %) and Tigray (87.1 %). It is important to note that unlike all other administrative regions, Addis Ababa and Harari are autonomous metropolitans. Among all the variables presented in Table 1, the under-five children mortality/survival rate difference by the mother’s highest education level or by the mother’s current pregnancy status was statistically insignificant (p > 0.058). As these results are descriptive they give some highlights on how each risk factor is independently associated with the under-five mortality/survival rate. However, several other risk factors must be taken into account when considering the potential effect of a risk factor. The next step is to find the determinants of under-five mortality using the chosen model. The model diagnosis was performed in the analysis. The result is presented in the Additional file 1.
Table 1

Distribution between child mortality and socio-economic, demographic and geographic variables

VariablesSurvived under-five children
Yes%No%Total P-value
Year of the survey2000950187.9 %130712.1 %10,808<0.000
2005887191.2 %8518.8 %9722
201136,79183.7 %717916.3 %43,970
RegionTigray608387.1 %90212.9 %6985
Affar444383.0 %91317.0 %5356<0.001
Amhara776684.4 %143615.6 %9202
Oromiya902786.0 %147314.0 %10,500
Somali349886.5 %54613.5 %4044
Ben-Gumz437581.8 %97418.2 %5349
SNNP823585.3 %142114.7 %9656
Gambela329984.6 %59915.4 %3898
Harari311087.9 %42712.1 %3537
Addis247492.9 %1907.1 %2664
Dire Dawa285386.2 %45613.8 %3309
Type of place of residenceUrban885189.6 %102810.4 %9879<0.001
Rural46,31284.8 %830915.2 %54,621
Highest educational levelNo education41,98784.3 %780215.7 %49,789
Primary10,30088.4 %135611.6 %11,6560.058
Secondary223994.0 %1426.0 %2381
Higher63794.5 %375.5 %674
ReligionChristian31,22486.3 %494713.7 %36,171
Muslim22,64684.5 %413915.5 %26,785<0.001
Other127583.7 %24916.3 %1524
Currently pregnantNo or unsure50,07785.7 %835614.3 %58,4330.067
Yes508683.8 %98116.2 %6067
Child is twinSingle birth54,21986.2 %871413.8 %62,933
1st of multiple46759.8 %31440.2 %781<0.001
2nd of multiple47660.9 %30539.1 %781
Sex of childMale27,96084.4 %515815.6 %33,118<0.001
Female27,20386.7 %417913.3 %31,382
Type of toilet facilityNo facility31,73085.1 %556614.9 %37,296
Flush toilet124789.3 %14910.7 %1396<0.001
Pit Latrine21,09586.0 %343114.0 %24,526
Main floor materialNatural floor/dung47,25384.8 %845715.2 %55,710
Wood/parquet311190.7 %3199.3 %3430<0.001
Cement352591.2 %3428.8 %3867
Main wall materialNatural walls756283.2 %153016.8 %9092
Rudimentary walls34,01785.0 %599215.0 %40,009<0.001
Finished walls311189.5 %36610.5 %3477
Main roof materialNatural roofing24,82083.8 %478616.2 %29,606<0.001
Rudimentary roofing907686.2 %145513.8 %10,531
Finished roofing19,44687.4 %281012.6 %22,256
Distribution between child mortality and socio-economic, demographic and geographic variables Table 2 gives estimates with hazard ratios for socio-economic, demographic and geographic factors. Based on the findings, there is a variation for the current age of mothers within the EDHS year. As the age of mother’s increased, the hazard ratios were increasing for EDHS years 2000 and 2005. This shows that as the mother’s age increases the risk of the child dying before reaching age 5 increases. But in the 2011 EDHS, the result shows the decrease of under-five mortality risk as the mother’s age increases. The comparisons between the year of the survey show the difference between any two survey years is significant and in recent surveys the effect of the mother’s age weakens. Based on the hazard ratio, the gap between the year 2000 and 2005 is wide. This shows that child mortality was significantly more for 2000 EDHS. But the gap between the 2005 and 2011 EDHSs is small.
Table 2

Estimate of the parameters from the proportional Cox Hazard Model

PredictorsHazard ratioHazard ratios difference
2000 VS 20112005 Vs 20112000 Vs 2005
20002005201195 % CI95 % CI95 % CI
LowerUpperLowerUpperLowerUpper
Current age of respondent2.95*1.01*0.95*1.322.99**0.020.61**1.771.97**
Age at first birth1.15*1.16*1.05*0.260.77**0.070.28**0.961.00
Age at first sex1.631.010.89*0.751.050.160.420.730.98
Region (Ref. Oromiya)
 Tigray5.104.961.171.884.26**3.125.05**0.080.77
 Affar2.542.580.82*0.742.671.082.63**0.801.74**
 Amhara2.88*2.34*1.031.252.96**0.952.080.230.87**
 Somali1.972.460.78*1.292.02**1.032.75**1.202.70
 Benishangul-Gumz2.702.200.931.323.41**1.083.45**0.180.58**
 SNNP2.792.370.921.922.681.052.81**0.260.89**
 Gambela2.762.241.071.022.53**1.672.830.411.12
 Harari3.222.491.131.463.51**1.142.82**0.620.92**
 Addis Ababa0.960.760.700.170.72**0.040.52**0.070.56**
 Dire Dawa2.872.510.910.911.241.111.51**0.230.62**
Place of residence (Ref. Urban)
 Rural1.050.981.19*0.681.120.140.69**0.030.69**
Highest educational level (Ref. Higher)
 No education2.85*2.31*0.79*2.033.08**1.131.91**0.360.92**
 Primary2.912.53*0.82*2.052.85**0.941.420.150.71**
 Secondary2.93*2.850.87*2.002.78**1.272.07**0.170.86
Religion (Ref. Orthodox)
 Muslim1.761.061.10*0.370.68**0.180.570.210.58
 Catholic1.851.211.01*1.061.390.400.620.151.19
 Protestant1.760.961.091.121.480.260.700.191.34
 Traditional1.551.070.881.151.530.170.790.200.89**
 Other1.521.791.71*0.991.440.230.660.190.92**
Family size3.931.350.99*2.023.84**0.180.88**1.202.28
No of Under five children1.530.991.68*0.540.99**0.581.210.310.88**
Children ever born1.07*1.041.06*0.010.15**0.290.870.070.78
Birth in the last five years3.83*1.321.032.003.96**0.170.381.382.73**
Currently pregnant (Ref. No)
 Yes0.981.031.060.140.820.090.210.030.65
Type of birth (Ref. Single birth)
 1st of multiple0.56*0.791.180.521.430.350.91**0.810.85
 2nd of multiple1.051.142.000.501.560.150.790.040.56**
 3rd of multiple1.391.38*0.56*0.480.85**0.741.100.060.25
Sex of the child (Ref. Female)
 Male1.081.191.09*0.010.34**0.040.33**0.070.28**
Toilet facility (Ref. Pit latrine)
 Flush toilet3.920.731.130.371.940.591.272.033.10
 No facility1.020.921.010.481.980.162.010.630.72
Type of fuel (Ref. Charcoal/wood etc.)
 Electricity1.102.192.16*0.771.230.240.840.811.22
 Gas/LPG0.43*0.39*1.350.440.840.400.890.010.37**
 No food cooked1.131.010.630.991.090.351.120.180.74
Floor material (Ref. Carpet)
 Cement1.050.731.120.201.430.302.060.651.24
 Natural floor1.150.920.940.031.930.952.370.571.17
 Wood/ceramics1.56*0.630.770.831.020.621.090.491.10
Roof material (Ref. Thatch/Plastic/wood)
 Finished roofing1.150.931.000.691.040.731.420.280.83
 No roof1.560.950.990.041.990.201.720.741.26
Wall material (Ref. Finished walls)
 No walls1.060.930.820.981.330.581.280.250.69
 Cane/bamboo/wood0.991.040.81*0.801.960.921.800.110.25

* Significant at 5 % level of significance

**Significant interaction effects

Estimate of the parameters from the proportional Cox Hazard Model * Significant at 5 % level of significance **Significant interaction effects The age at 1st birth was significant in all the EDHS years. Notably, the effect of age at 1st birth reduces in the recent surveys. The result is presented in Table 2. The gap between the years 2000 and 2005 is very small. But after the 2005 survey, the result shows the declining trend in under-five mortality in the year 2011 for age at first birth. On the other hand the rural-urban difference is insignificant between the three EDHS years, though the 2011 result of EDHS only shows a significant difference between rural and urban under-five mortality hazard ratios (Table 2). The other significant effect is the joint effect of region and year of the survey (Table 2). Therefore, from the analysis, it can be identified that child mortality is higher for the Tigray region for 2000 and for 2005 followed by Oromiya region for 2000 and for 2005. Moreover, the trend of child mortality displays a decreasing trend for the year 2011 compared to years 2000 and 2005 for all regions (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Hazard ratio associated with under-five mortality and region with year of the survey

Hazard ratio associated with under-five mortality and region with year of the survey The other significant effect is the between educational level and survey year. Likewise, the year of reference is 2011. Therefore, the output shows that mothers with no education have a lower chance for the child to be dead before reaching age five for all EDHS survey years followed by mothers with primary and secondary education (Table 2). When compared between years, the under-five mortality is significantly higher for the year 2000 followed by 2005 and 2011 (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Hazard ratio associated with under-five mortality and educational level with year of the survey

Hazard ratio associated with under-five mortality and educational level with year of the survey On the other hand, Table 2 shows that there is significant effect between EDHS surveys and family size. As the analysis shows, for the year 2000, child mortality increased by 2.93 % for an increase in a number of household members in the house in comparison to the year 2011. Likewise, for the year 2005, child mortality is higher by 0.35 % for an increase in a number of household members in the house compared to the year 2011. Furthermore, the under-five mortality is lower as the year of study increases (2000, 2005 and 2011) and the child mortality is higher for an increase in family size. For households with more under-five children in the house, under-five mortality shows an increase for the years 2000 and 2011. But for the year 2005, the analysis gives that child mortality shows a decrease for an increase in the number of under-five children in the household (Table 2). Furthermore, Table 2 presents the significant factors of child mortality and EDHS surveys. As the result indicates, the effect of total children ever born is not similar between the survey years. The occurrence for the child not to be alive before celebrating age five is higher for the year 2000 followed by the year 2011. EDHS 2005 survey shows a decline in under-five mortality compared to 2000 and 2011. As can be seen in Fig. 3, under-five mortality increases as the number of children ever born increases for all EDHS survey years.
Fig. 3

Hazard ratio associated with under-five mortality and total children ever born in the house with year of the survey

Hazard ratio associated with under-five mortality and total children ever born in the house with year of the survey The estimated survival curve for children under the age of five for male and female is given in Fig. 4. From the figure, the survival curves give a visual representation of the life tables. From the figure, it can be seen that male children were at a higher risk of death than female children. The equality of the survival function among groups can be tested using non-parametric methods (Fig. 4). Figure 4 of the estimator stratified by gender below shows that females generally have a worse survival experience. This is supported by the three significant tests of equality. These are Log-Rank (Chi-square = 7.7911, P-value =0.0053), Wilcoxon (Chi-square = 5.5370, P-value = 0.0186) and -2Log (LR) (Chi-square = 10.5120, P-value = 0.0012). Moreover, as the age of a child increases the probability of the child to survive is decreasing for both male and female and at the end, the survival for both male and female is the same.
Fig. 4

Survival function at mean of covariates

Survival function at mean of covariates

Discussion

In this research, the trends of under-five mortality with the effects of socio-economic, demographic and geographic in Ethiopia using 2000, 2005 and 2011 EDHS was investigated. For this study, the nationally representative data from 2000, 2005 to 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Surveys was used. The Cox regression analysis technique has been useful to find the significant socio-economic, demographic and geographic covariates of under-five mortality over the years. Cox regression model can be used when the relative risk values for different levels of variables are measured at different levels of socio-economic, demographic and geographic variables. A study which involves an outcome variable of interest with the time to the occurrence of an event can be modelled using the proportional hazards model. For this kind of situation using logistics regression method ignores the actual failure time and models the occurrence or non-occurrence of the event. But the inclusion of the time to event information is important to obtain the actual and accurate estimates [18]. Even though infant and child mortality rates have been decreasing in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa in recent decades, it remains among the highest in the world. In literature, the decrease in mortality is recorded in detail. From the documentation, it was not possible to identify the several socio-economic, demographic and geographic factors. Moreover, identifying the pattern of mortality by means of different years of surveys is essential. Therefore, for this study, the Cox Regression Method was used. The Cox Regression procedure is useful for modelling the time to a specified event, based on the values of given covariates. Several socio-economic, demographic and geographic predictors were used to estimate the level of under-five mortality to find trends. Moreover, the death of a child (status variable) is binary and dependent variable in Cox regression. Time variable (age at death) measures the extent to the event defined by the status variable. The covariates (independent variables) for this study contain both categorical and continuous variables. The findings of this study which incorporates the child mortality in Ethiopia displayed that socio-economic, demographic and social factors have a great effect on the child mortality between the years of 2000, 2005 and 2011. These factors are age at 1st birth, place of residence, educational level, family size, number of children under five, total children ever born and age of respondents. The result from the study suggests that one in 17 Ethiopian children dies before their first birthday. Furthermore, the Cox regression model determined that the data obtained during 2000, 2005 and 2011 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey has a great importance and it captures method-dependent. On the basis of this study, child mortality is greater in 2000 followed by 2005 in comparison to 2011. Furthermore, the risk of under-five mortality declines from 2000 to 2011 for educational level. In the same way, number of household members and the number of under-five children in the house display differences between years. From the analysis, the age of the women displays differences between years. Consequently, child mortality is declining from 2000 to 2011. For a growth in total children ever born the possibility of a child to die is greater for the year 2000 followed by 2005 and 2011. But for the number of last 5 years birth, child mortality increased from 2000 to 2011. Therefore, for the women having more children in 5 years has to be avoided to reduce the risk of under-five mortality.

Conclusion

Finally, for educated mothers giving birth at the older age have higher chances for a child to reach age five. Furthermore, for unemployed mothers living in households with large members, under-five mortality is higher. Consequently, for women who are not pregnant, giving birth at older ages reduces child mortality. In addition to this child mortality varies by regions for the three survey years. But, in some regions, the decline for child mortality between years was observed. To reduce child mortality, implementing better education for family planning and child health care is an important strategy which has to be implemented by the government. For further study, the structured additive model which incorporates the spatial variation between primary sampling units can be used to assess the effect of socio-economic, demographic and geographic factors. The limitation of EDHS survey can be associated with the following criticisms. These include the EDHS data only collected from women aged between the ages of 15 and 49 who are alive in a given household. But for mothers who have died, no data was collected. This situation can create a bias in the results. The technique used in the EDHS survey is a retrospective method. This is related to various difficulties and challenges. The main difficulty with this challenge is related to the quality of the results because it depends on the completeness and correctness of the birth and death history. Therefore, the conclusions and recommendations of the study can be affected by this problem. The other limitation is related to the sample size. The sample size is the only representative at the highest administrative unit of the country. Therefore, the dataset cannot be used to estimates at the lowest administrative units.
  6 in total

1.  Indirect child mortality estimation technique to identify trends of under-five mortality in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Dawit G Ayele; Temesgen Zewotir; Henry Mwambi
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 2.  Parental education and child health: intracountry evidence.

Authors:  S H Cochrane; J Leslie; D J O'Hara
Journal:  Health Policy Educ       Date:  1982-03

3.  Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors:  Haidong Wang; Chelsea A Liddell; Matthew M Coates; Meghan D Mooney; Carly E Levitz; Austin E Schumacher; Henry Apfel; Marissa Iannarone; Bryan Phillips; Katherine T Lofgren; Logan Sandar; Rob E Dorrington; Ivo Rakovac; Troy A Jacobs; Xiaofeng Liang; Maigeng Zhou; Jun Zhu; Gonghuan Yang; Yanping Wang; Shiwei Liu; Yichong Li; Ayse Abbasoglu Ozgoren; Semaw Ferede Abera; Ibrahim Abubakar; Tom Achoki; Ademola Adelekan; Zanfina Ademi; Zewdie Aderaw Alemu; Peter J Allen; Mohammad AbdulAziz AlMazroa; Elena Alvarez; Adansi A Amankwaa; Azmeraw T Amare; Walid Ammar; Palwasha Anwari; Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham; Majed Masoud Asad; Reza Assadi; Amitava Banerjee; Sanjay Basu; Neeraj Bedi; Tolesa Bekele; Michelle L Bell; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Jed D Blore; Berrak Bora Basara; Soufiane Boufous; Nicholas Breitborde; Nigel G Bruce; Linh Ngoc Bui; Jonathan R Carapetis; Rosario Cárdenas; David O Carpenter; Valeria Caso; Ruben Estanislao Castro; Ferrán Catalá-Lopéz; Alanur Cavlin; Xuan Che; Peggy Pei-Chia Chiang; Rajiv Chowdhury; Costas A Christophi; Ting-Wu Chuang; Massimo Cirillo; Iuri da Costa Leite; Karen J Courville; Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona; Adrian Davis; Anand Dayama; Kebede Deribe; Samath D Dharmaratne; Mukesh K Dherani; Uğur Dilmen; Eric L Ding; Karen M Edmond; Sergei Petrovich Ermakov; Farshad Farzadfar; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Daniel Obadare Fijabi; Nataliya Foigt; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Ana C Garcia; Johanna M Geleijnse; Bradford D Gessner; Ketevan Goginashvili; Philimon Gona; Atsushi Goto; Hebe N Gouda; Mark A Green; Karen Fern Greenwell; Harish Chander Gugnani; Rahul Gupta; Randah Ribhi Hamadeh; Mouhanad Hammami; Hilda L Harb; Simon Hay; Mohammad T Hedayati; H Dean Hosgood; Damian G Hoy; Bulat T Idrisov; Farhad Islami; Samaya Ismayilova; Vivekanand Jha; Guohong Jiang; Jost B Jonas; Knud Juel; Edmond Kato Kabagambe; Dhruv S Kazi; Andre Pascal Kengne; Maia Kereselidze; Yousef Saleh Khader; Shams Eldin Ali Hassan Khalifa; Young-Ho Khang; Daniel Kim; Yohannes Kinfu; Jonas M Kinge; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Soewarta Kosen; Barthelemy Kuate Defo; G Anil Kumar; Kaushalendra Kumar; Ravi B Kumar; Taavi Lai; Qing Lan; Anders Larsson; Jong-Tae Lee; Mall Leinsalu; Stephen S Lim; Steven E Lipshultz; Giancarlo Logroscino; Paulo A Lotufo; Raimundas Lunevicius; Ronan Anthony Lyons; Stefan Ma; Abbas Ali Mahdi; Melvin Barrientos Marzan; Mohammad Taufiq Mashal; Tasara T Mazorodze; John J McGrath; Ziad A Memish; Walter Mendoza; George A Mensah; Atte Meretoja; Ted R Miller; Edward J Mills; Karzan Abdulmuhsin Mohammad; Ali H Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Marcella Montico; Ami R Moore; Joanna Moschandreas; William T Msemburi; Ulrich O Mueller; Magdalena M Muszynska; Mohsen Naghavi; Kovin S Naidoo; K M Venkat Narayan; Chakib Nejjari; Marie Ng; Jean de Dieu Ngirabega; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Luke Nyakarahuka; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Saad B Omer; Angel J Paternina Caicedo; Victoria Pillay-van Wyk; Dan Pope; Farshad Pourmalek; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Sajjad U R Rahman; Saleem M Rana; Robert Quentin Reilly; David Rojas-Rueda; Luca Ronfani; Lesley Rushton; Mohammad Yahya Saeedi; Joshua A Salomon; Uchechukwu Sampson; Itamar S Santos; Monika Sawhney; Jürgen C Schmidt; Marina Shakh-Nazarova; Jun She; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Kenji Shibuya; Hwashin Hyun Shin; Kawkab Shishani; Ivy Shiue; Inga Dora Sigfusdottir; Jasvinder A Singh; Vegard Skirbekk; Karen Sliwa; Sergey S Soshnikov; Luciano A Sposato; Vasiliki Kalliopi Stathopoulou; Konstantinos Stroumpoulis; Karen M Tabb; Roberto Tchio Talongwa; Carolina Maria Teixeira; Abdullah Sulieman Terkawi; Alan J Thomson; Andrew L Thorne-Lyman; Hideaki Toyoshima; Zacharie Tsala Dimbuene; Parfait Uwaliraye; Selen Begüm Uzun; Tommi J Vasankari; Ana Maria Nogales Vasconcelos; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Stephen Waller; Xia Wan; Scott Weichenthal; Elisabete Weiderpass; Robert G Weintraub; Ronny Westerman; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Yang C Yang; Gokalp Kadri Yentur; Paul Yip; Naohiro Yonemoto; Mustafa Younis; Chuanhua Yu; Kim Yun Jin; Maysaa El Sayed Zaki; Shankuan Zhu; Theo Vos; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Structured additive regression models with spatial correlation to estimate under-five mortality risk factors in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Dawit G Ayele; Temesgen T Zewotir; Henry G Mwambi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Child mortality rate in ethiopia.

Authors:  A Sathiya Susuman
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 1.429

6.  Infant mortality and causes of infant deaths in rural Ethiopia: a population-based cohort of 3684 births.

Authors:  Berhe Weldearegawi; Yohannes Adama Melaku; Semaw Ferede Abera; Yemane Ashebir; Fisaha Haile; Afework Mulugeta; Frehiwot Eshetu; Mark Spigt
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Effect of health extension service on under-five child mortality and determinants of under-five child mortality in Derra district, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Abate Tadesse Zeleke
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  Child mortality associated with maternal HIV status: a retrospective analysis in Rwanda, 2005-2015.

Authors:  Eric Remera; Frédérique Chammartin; Sabin Nsanzimana; Jamie Ian Forrest; Gerald E Smith; Placidie Mugwaneza; Samuel S Malamba; Muhammed Semakula; Jeanine U Condo; Nathan Ford; David J Riedel; Marie Paul Nisingizwe; Agnes Binagwaho; Edward J Mills; Heiner Bucher
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

3.  Factors Affecting Under-Five Mortality in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Negative Binomial Model.

Authors:  Bisrat Misganew Geremew; Kassahun Alemu Gelaye; Alemakef Wagnew Melesse; Temesgen Yihunie Akalu; Adhanom Gebreegziabher Baraki
Journal:  Pediatric Health Med Ther       Date:  2020-12-31

4.  Determinant factors of under-five mortality in Southern Nations, Nationalities and People's region (SNNPR), Ethiopia.

Authors:  Gizachew Gobebo
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.638

5.  Predictors of time-to-death on children in Tigray regional state, Ethiopia: a retrospective cross sectional study.

Authors:  Gebru Gebremeskel Gebrerufael; Bsrat Tesfay Hagos
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25

6.  Survival analysis of under-five mortality using Cox and frailty models in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Dawit G Ayele; Temesgen T Zewotir; Hemry Mwambi
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Count Models Analysis of Factors Associated with Under-Five Mortality in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Berhanu Teshome Woldeamanuel; Merga Abdissa Aga
Journal:  Glob Pediatr Health       Date:  2021-02-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.