Literature DB >> 27595434

Socio-economic disparities in access to assisted reproductive technologies in Australia.

Katie Harris1, Hugh Burley2, Robert McLachlan3, Mark Bowman4, Alan Macaldowie5, Kate Taylor6, Michael Chapman7, Georgina Mary Chambers5.   

Abstract

Women from disadvantaged socio-economic groups access assisted reproductive technology treatment less than women from more advantaged groups. However, women from disadvantaged groups tend to start families younger, making them less likely to suffer from age-related subfertility and potentially have less need for fertility treatment. Whether socio-economic disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology treatment persist after controlling for the need for treatment, has not been previously explored. This population based study demonstrates that socio-economic disparities in access to assisted reproductive technology treatment persist after adjusting for several confounding factors, including age at first birth (used as a measure of delayed childbearing, hence a proxy for need for fertility treatment), geographic remoteness and Australian jurisdiction. Assisted reproductive technology access progressively decreased as socio-economic quintiles became more disadvantaged, with a 15.8% decrease in access in the most disadvantaged quintile compared with the most advantaged quintile after controlling for confounding factors. The adjusted rate of access to assisted reproductive technology treatment also decreased by 12.3% for women living in regional and remote areas compared with those in major cities. These findings indicate that financial and sociocultural barriers to assisted reproductive technology treatment remain in disadvantaged groups after adjusting for need.
Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; assisted reproductive technology; epidemiology; socio-economic disparities

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27595434     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  8 in total

1.  The Future of Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Births in the United States.

Authors:  Katherine Tierney
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 2.  Access to Fertility Care in Geographically Underserved Populations, a Second Look.

Authors:  Tia Y Brodeur; Daniel Grow; Navid Esfandiari
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Knowledge regarding factors that influence fertility in Thai reproductive-age population living in urban area: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sarapan Na Nakhon; Pawan Limvorapitux; Patsama Vichinsartvichai
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2018-03-30

4.  Decision analysis about the cost-effectiveness of different in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer protocol under considering governments, hospitals, and patient.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Haiting Tu; Lei Jin; Cheng Hu; Yuehan Li; Renjie Wang; Weiming Huang; ShuJie Liao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Cracked open: exploring attitudes on access to egg freezing.

Authors:  Molly Johnston; Giuliana Fuscaldo; Nadine Maree Richings; StellaMay Gwini; Sally Catt
Journal:  Sex Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2020-12

Review 6.  Use of in vitro fertilization-ethical issues.

Authors:  Kjell Asplund
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.646

7.  "We are only looking at the tip of the iceberg in infertility": perspectives of health providers about fertility issues and management among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

Authors:  Emily Gilbert; Ruth Walker; David Simon; Ruth Derkenne; Alice Rumbold; Sandra Campbell; Jacqueline A Boyle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Reproductive outcomes in women and men using complementary and alternative medicine treatment and not receiving artificial reproductive technology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hannah M Yogasundram; Andrew J O Hui; Clifford Y S Sia; Anthea C Chui; William J Waldock; Siobhan Quenby; Elizabeth Brown; Clare Oliver-Williams
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.344

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.