Literature DB >> 27594306

How much do clinicians support patient self-management? The development of a measure to assess clinician self-management support.

Jessica Greene1, Rebecca M Sacks2, Judith H Hibbard3, Valerie Overton4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary care provider (PCP) support of patient self-management may be important mechanism to improving patient health outcomes. In this paper we develop a PCP-reported measure of clinician strategies for supporting patient self-management, and we psychometrically test and validate the measure.
METHODS: We developed survey items based upon effective self-management support strategies identified in a prior mixed methods study. We fielded a survey in the fall of 2014 with 139 Fairview Health Services PCPs, and conducted exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's Alpha to test for scale reliability. To validate the measure, we examined the Self-Management Support (SMS) scale's relationship to survey items on self-management support, as well as clinicians' patient panel rates of smoking cessation and weight loss.
RESULTS: Nine survey items clustered reliably to create a single factor (Cronbach's Alpha=0.73). SMS scores ranged from 2.1 to 4.9. The SMS was related to each of the validation variables. PCPs who reported spending 60% percent or more of their time counseling, educating, and coaching patients had a mean SMS score of 4.0, while those who reported spending less than 30% of their time doing so had mean SMS scores 15% lower. PCPs' SMS scores exhibited significant but modest associations with their patients' smoking cessation and weight loss (among obese patients) (r=0.21 and r=0.13 respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This study develops and tests a promising measure of PCPs' strategies to support patient self-management. It highlights variation across PCPs. Future work should examine whether increasing scores of PCPs low on the SMS improves chronic care quality outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27594306     DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc (Amst)        ISSN: 2213-0764


  2 in total

Review 1.  Patient engagement in care: A scoping review of recently validated tools assessing patients' and healthcare professionals' preferences and experience.

Authors:  Nathalie Clavel; Jesseca Paquette; Vincent Dumez; Claudio Del Grande; Djahanchah Philip Sacha Ghadiri; Marie-Pascale Pomey; Louise Normandin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Italian Consensus Statement on Patient Engagement in Chronic Care: Process and Outcomes.

Authors:  Guendalina Graffigna; Serena Barello; Giuseppe Riva; Massimo Corbo; Gianfranco Damiani; Primiano Iannone; Albino Claudio Bosio; Walter Ricciardi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.