| Literature DB >> 27594063 |
Elizabeth Weathers1, Rónán O'Caoimh2, Ronan O'Sullivan3, Constança Paúl4, Frances Orfilia5, Roger Clarnette6, Carol Fitzgerald7, Anton Svendrovski8, Nicola Cornally9, Patricia Leahy-Warren10, D William Molloy11.
Abstract
Predicting risk of adverse healthcare outcomes is important to enable targeted delivery of interventions. The Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC), designed for use by public health nurses (PHNs), measures the 1-year risk of hospitalisation, institutionalisation and death in community-dwelling older adults according to a five-point global risk score: from low (score 1,2) to medium (3) to high (4,5). We examined the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the RISC between student PHNs (n=32) and expert raters using six cases (two low, medium and high-risk), scored before and after RISC training. Correlations increased for each adverse outcome, statistically significantly for institutionalisation (r=0.72 to 0.80, p=0.04) and hospitalisation (r=0.51 to 0.71, p<0.01) but not death. Training improved accuracy for low-risk but not all high-risk cases. Overall, the RISC showed good IRR, which increased after RISC training. That reliability fell for some high-risk cases suggests that the training programme requires adjustment to improve IRR further.Entities:
Keywords: Adverse outcomes; Frailty; Inter-rater reliability; Risk; Screening
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27594063 DOI: 10.12968/bjcn.2016.21.9.469
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Community Nurs ISSN: 1462-4753