J Ryan Martin1, Chad D Watts2, Daniel L Levy1, Raymond H Kim3. 1. Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, Colorado. 2. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Colorado Joint Replacement, Denver, Colorado; Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stress shielding is a well-recognized complication associated with total knee arthroplasty. However, this phenomenon has not been thoroughly described. Specifically, no study to our knowledge has evaluated the radiographic impact of utilizing various tibial component compositions on tibial stress shielding. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 3 cohorts of 50 patients that had a preoperative varus deformity and were implanted with a titanium, cobalt chromium (CoCr), or an all polyethylene tibial implant. A radiographic comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the amount of medial tibial bone loss in each cohort. In addition, a clinical outcomes analysis was performed on the 3 cohorts. RESULTS: The CoCr was noted to have a statistically significant increase in medial tibial bone loss compared with the other 2 cohorts. The all polyethylene cohort had a statistically significantly higher final Knee Society Score and was associated with the least amount of stress shielding. CONCLUSION: The CoCr tray is the most rigid of 3 implants that were compared in this study. Interestingly, this cohort had the highest amount of medial tibial bone loss. In addition, 1 patient in the CoCr cohort had medial soft tissue irritation which was attributed to a prominent medial tibial tray which required revision surgery to mitigate the symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Stress shielding is a well-recognized complication associated with total knee arthroplasty. However, this phenomenon has not been thoroughly described. Specifically, no study to our knowledge has evaluated the radiographic impact of utilizing various tibial component compositions on tibial stress shielding. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 3 cohorts of 50 patients that had a preoperative varus deformity and were implanted with a titanium, cobalt chromium (CoCr), or an all polyethylene tibial implant. A radiographic comparative analysis was performed to evaluate the amount of medial tibial bone loss in each cohort. In addition, a clinical outcomes analysis was performed on the 3 cohorts. RESULTS: The CoCr was noted to have a statistically significant increase in medial tibial bone loss compared with the other 2 cohorts. The all polyethylene cohort had a statistically significantly higher final Knee Society Score and was associated with the least amount of stress shielding. CONCLUSION: The CoCr tray is the most rigid of 3 implants that were compared in this study. Interestingly, this cohort had the highest amount of medial tibial bone loss. In addition, 1 patient in the CoCr cohort had medial soft tissue irritation which was attributed to a prominent medial tibial tray which required revision surgery to mitigate the symptoms.
Authors: Dominic T Mathis; Joshua Schmidli; Felix Amsler; Johann Henckel; Harry Hothi; Alister Hart; Michael T Hirschmann Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2022-05-19 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Thomas Anijs; Sanne Eemers; Yukihide Minoda; David Wolfson; Nico Verdonschot; Dennis Janssen Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2021-10-18 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: A Cerquiglini; J Henckel; H Hothi; P Allen; J Lewis; A Eskelinen; J Skinner; M T Hirschmann; A J Hart Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 5.853
Authors: Byung W Cho; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hyuck M Kwon; Woo-Suk Lee; Ick H Yang; Ji H Nam; Yong-Gon Koh; Kwan K Park Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2022-05 Impact factor: 4.410