| Literature DB >> 27593407 |
Igor Batista Camargo1, João Batista Sobrinho2, Emanuel Sávio de Souza Andrade3, Joseph E Van Sickels4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lower third molar (M3) eruption is unpredictable. The purpose of this study was to correlate radiographic position of M3 on a preexistent film with the current clinical, histopathological, and radiographic findings.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27593407 PMCID: PMC5011069 DOI: 10.1186/s40510-016-0139-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Orthod ISSN: 1723-7785 Impact factor: 2.750
Fig. 1Panoramic radiograph at T0
Fig. 2Panoramic radiograph of the same patient showing the M3 development along 5 years (T1)
Fig. 3Radioimp® software used to obtain the M3 classification and dental follicle measurements
Classification and prevalence of dental diseases analyzed according to the clinical data (T1)
| Variable |
| Percent |
|---|---|---|
| • Stage of eruption—3rd molars | ||
| Erupted | 8 | 15.4 |
| Partial erupted | 14 | 26.9 |
| Full bony impacted | 27 | 51.9 |
| Agenesis | 2 | 3.8 |
| Extracted as a result of pain | 1 | 1.9 |
| Total | 52 | 100.0 |
| • Cavity—3rd molars | ||
| Absent | 40 | 81.6 |
| Pits and fissures | 8 | 16.3 |
| Cavitation | 1 | 2.0 |
| • Cavity—2nd molars | ||
| Absent | 26 | 53.1 |
| Pits and fissures | 2 | 4.1 |
| Restored | 21 | 42.9 |
| • Pericoronitis—3rd molars | ||
| Absent | 46 | 93.9 |
| Present | – | – |
| Previous episode at the site | 3 | 6.1 |
| • Periodontal disease—3rd molars | ||
| Present | 49 | 100.0 |
| Absent | – | – |
| • Expansion of the cortical bone—3rd molars | ||
| Absent | 49 | 100.0 |
| Present | – | – |
| Total | 49 | 100.0 |
n number of teeth
Statistical analysis of the steepness changing of the third molars during the evaluation period
| Time of evaluation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Statistics | Initial (T0) | Final (T1) | Difference |
|
| • Angle | Average | 49.43 | 56.63 | 7.20 |
|
| Median | 53.80 | 58.90 | 9.20 | ||
| SD | 16.52 | 33.77 | 28.11 | ||
| CV | 33.42 | 59.63 | |||
| Minimum | −3.80 | −39.60 | −48.80 | ||
| Maximum | 91.70 | 111.40 | 65.10 | ||
SD standard deviation, CV coefficient of variation, n number of teeth
aThrough the paired Student’s t test
Correlation of the root resorption of second molars according to the stage of eruption of the lower M3 positions at T1
| Resorption—2nd molars | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Present | Absent | Total |
| |||
|
| % |
| % |
| % | ||
| • Stage of eruption | |||||||
| Erupted | – | – | 8 | 100.0 | 8 | 100.0 |
|
| Partial erupted | – | – | 14 | 100.0 | 14 | 100.0 | |
| Full bone impacted | 10 | 37.0 | 17 | 63.0 | 27 | 100.0 | |
| Total | 10 | 20.4 | 39 | 79.6 | 49 | 100.0 | |
| • Pell and Gregory—T1 | |||||||
| IA | – | – | 17 | 100.0 | 17 | 100.0 |
|
| IIA | 3 | 30.0 | 7 | 70.0 | 10 | 100.0 | |
| IB | 3 | 37.5 | 5 | 62.5 | 8 | 100.0 | |
| IIB | 1 | 11.1 | 8 | 88.9 | 9 | 100.0 | |
| • Winter—T1 | |||||||
| Horizontal | 5 | 55.6 | 4 | 44.4 | 9 | 100.0 |
|
| Mesioangular | 5 | 38.5 | 8 | 61.5 | 13 | 100.0 | |
| Vertical | – | – | 20 | 100.0 | 20 | 100.0 | |
| Group total | 10 | 20.4 | 39 | 79.6 | 49 | 100.0 | |
Obs.: Relative risk was not determined due to the occurrence of zero or very low frequencies
n number of teeth
*Significant difference at 5 %
aFisher’s exact test
Evaluation of the prevalence of crowding presenting with orthodontic treatment (T1) and the initial Pell and Gregory classification (T0)
| Dental crowding | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Present | Absent | Total |
| |||
|
| % |
| % |
| % | ||
| • Orthodontic treatment—T1 | |||||||
| In implementation | – | – | 6 | 100.0 | 6 | 100.0 |
|
| Completed without lingual retainer | 5 | 55.6 | 4 | 44.4 | 9 | 100.0 | |
| Completed with contention | 1 | 12.5 | 7 | 87.5 | 8 | 100.0 | |
| Not completed | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 2 | 100.0 | |
| Not taken | 1 | 100.0 | – | – | 1 | 100.0 | |
| • Pell and Gregory—T0 | |||||||
| IIB | 3 | 21.4 | 11 | 78.6 | 14 | 100.0 |
|
| IIIB | 4 | 66.7 | 2 | 33.3 | 6 | 100.0 | |
| IC | – | – | 6 | 100.0 | 6 | 100.0 | |
| IIC | 7 | 50.0 | 7 | 50.0 | 14 | 100.0 | |
Obs.: Relative risk was not determined due to the occurrence of zero or very low frequencies
n Number of teeth
*Significant difference at 5 %
aFisher’s exact test
Statistic analysis of the width of radiolucency according to the Pell and Gregory and final Winter’s classification at T1
| Width of radiolucency | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Average | Median | SD | CV | Minimum | Maximum |
|
| • Pell & Gregory—vertical at T1 | |||||||
| A | 1.35 | 1.41 | 0.89 | 65.93 | 0.00 | 3.13 |
|
| B | 1.98 | 1.83 | 0.61 | 30.81 | 0.93 | 3.39 | |
Obs.: p = 0.014*a
*Significant difference at 5 %
aThrough the Student’s t test with equal variances