Literature DB >> 27593358

The reactivity of the back revisited. Are there differences in reactivity in different parts of the back?

Ann-Kristin Björk1, Magnus Bruze1, Malin Engfeldt1, Christel Nielsen2, Cecilia Svedman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the contact dermatitis literature, it is regularly stated that the patch test reactivity on various areas of the back differs, which might have a large impact on the reproducibility of patch testing.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reproducibility of patch testing on the upper back with regard to the left as opposed to the right side, and the medial as opposed to the lateral part of the upper back. The reproducibility over time and with regard to the reactivity pattern was also investigated.
METHODS: Thirty-one subjects with contact allergy to the metals gold (n = 19) or nickel (n = 12) were patch tested with serial dilutions, in triplicate applications, on different locations on the upper back. The Friedman test was used for statistical calculations.
RESULTS: No significant differences in the reactivity of the back were found. In all gold-allergic patients and 11 of 12 nickel-allergic patients, the allergy could be reproduced with regard to previous patch testing, but the degree of reactivity differed.
CONCLUSIONS: When a high level of standardization of the patch test technique with the same test system was used, there were no differences in patch test reactions and sites of application on the upper back.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomical site; angry back; contact allergy; excited skin syndrome; patch test; reactivity; reproducibility; serial dilution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27593358     DOI: 10.1111/cod.12657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  4 in total

Review 1.  Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Ian R White; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Does clinical testing support the current guidance definition of prolonged contact for nickel allergy?

Authors:  Rosemary L Nixon; Claire L Higgins; Danit Maor; Harini Rajgopal Bala; Alka Lalji; Katherine E Heim
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Outbreak of occupational allergic contact dermatitis from a smartphone screen protector glue.

Authors:  Francisca Herreros-Montejano; Martin Mowitz; Felipe Heras-Mendaza; Tatiana Sanz-Sánchez; María Elena Gatica-Ortega; Ana López-Mateos; Cristian Valenzuela-Oñate; Cristina Faura-Berruga; Violeta Zaragoza-Ninet; Magnus Bruze; Cecilia Svedman; María Antonia Pastor-Nieto
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.419

4.  Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: A ROAT study.

Authors:  Ada Uldahl; Malin Engfeldt; Cecilia Svedman
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.