Yaejin Moon1, Jacob J Sosnoff2. 1. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. Electronic address: ymoon9@illinois.edu. 2. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To systematically synthesize information on safe landing strategies for a fall, and quantitatively examine the effects of the strategies to reduce the risk of injury from a fall. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: Databases were searched using the combinations of keywords of "falls," "strategy," "impact," and "load." Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, pre-post studies, and cross-sectional studies were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Fall strategies were extracted and categorized by falling direction. Measurements of impact loads that reflect the risk of injuries were extracted (eg, impact velocity, impact force, fall duration, impact angle). Hedges' g was used as effect size to quantify the effect of a protective landing strategy to reduce the impact load. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 7 landing strategies (squatting, elbow flexion, forward rotation, martial arts rolling, martial arts slapping, relaxed muscle, stepping) in 13 studies were examined. In general, all strategies, except for the martial arts slapping technique, significantly reduced impact load (g values=.73-2.70). Squatting was an efficient strategy to reduce impact in backward falling (g=1.77), while elbow flexion with outstretched arms was effective in forward falling (g=.82). Also, in sideways falling strategies, martial arts rolling (g=2.70) and forward rotation (g=.82) were the most efficient strategies to reduce impact load. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that landing strategies have a significant effect on reducing impact load during a fall and might be effective to reduce the impact load of falling. The current study also highlighted limitations of the previous studies that focused on a young population and self-initiated falls. Further investigation with elderly individuals and unexpected falls is necessary to verify the effectiveness and suitability of the strategies for at-risk populations in real-life falls.
OBJECTIVES: To systematically synthesize information on safe landing strategies for a fall, and quantitatively examine the effects of the strategies to reduce the risk of injury from a fall. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Library. STUDY SELECTION: Databases were searched using the combinations of keywords of "falls," "strategy," "impact," and "load." Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, pre-post studies, and cross-sectional studies were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Fall strategies were extracted and categorized by falling direction. Measurements of impact loads that reflect the risk of injuries were extracted (eg, impact velocity, impact force, fall duration, impact angle). Hedges' g was used as effect size to quantify the effect of a protective landing strategy to reduce the impact load. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 7 landing strategies (squatting, elbow flexion, forward rotation, martial arts rolling, martial arts slapping, relaxed muscle, stepping) in 13 studies were examined. In general, all strategies, except for the martial arts slapping technique, significantly reduced impact load (g values=.73-2.70). Squatting was an efficient strategy to reduce impact in backward falling (g=1.77), while elbow flexion with outstretched arms was effective in forward falling (g=.82). Also, in sideways falling strategies, martial arts rolling (g=2.70) and forward rotation (g=.82) were the most efficient strategies to reduce impact load. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that landing strategies have a significant effect on reducing impact load during a fall and might be effective to reduce the impact load of falling. The current study also highlighted limitations of the previous studies that focused on a young population and self-initiated falls. Further investigation with elderly individuals and unexpected falls is necessary to verify the effectiveness and suitability of the strategies for at-risk populations in real-life falls.
Authors: S K Gratza; P O Chocano-Bedoya; E J Orav; M Fischbacher; G Freystätter; R Theiler; A Egli; R W Kressig; J A Kanis; H A Bischoff-Ferrari Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-08-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Marina Arkkukangas; Karin Strömqvist Bååthe; Anna Ekholm; Michail Tonkonogi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-16 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Luis Toronjo-Hornillo; Carolina Castañeda-Vázquez; María Del Carmen Campos-Mesa; Gloria González-Campos; Juan Corral-Pernía; Fátima Chacón-Borrego; Óscar DelCastillo-Andrés Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jun Sheng Gary Koh; Anne-Marie Hill; Keith D Hill; Christopher Etherton-Beer; Jacqueline Francis-Coad; Elizabeth Bell; Liz Bainbridge; Lex D de Jong Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 4.458
Authors: Óscar DelCastillo-Andrés; Luis Toronjo-Hornillo; Luis Toronjo-Urquiza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 3.390