Literature DB >> 27592341

Evaluation of anticoagulation selection for acute venous thromboembolism.

Hisham Badreldin1, Hunter Nichols2, Jessica Rimsans2, Danielle Carter2.   

Abstract

Treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been confined to parenteral agents and oral vitamin K antagonists for decades; however, with the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), clinicians now have more options. This study aims to evaluate the real world prescribing practices of all oral anticoagulants for VTE at a single center. A retrospective cohort analysis of all adult patients diagnosed with acute onset VTE was conducted. Of the 105 patients included in the analysis, 45 (43 %) patients received warfarin and 60 (57 %) patients received a DOAC. Rivaroxaban and apixaban were the most common DOACs initiated. There were significantly more patients in the warfarin group with an eCrCl of <60 ml/min compared to patients who received a DOAC (77.8 % vs. 15 %; P < 0.05). There were significantly less patients in the warfarin group with serum aminotranferase concentrations three times the upper limit of normal compared to those who received a DOAC (15.6 % vs. 55 %; P < 0.05). Patients who received a DOAC had less days on parenteral anticoagulation compared to patients who received warfarin (median 2.5 days [IQR 0-4] vs. 6 days [IQR 5-7], p < 0.05). Patients who received a DOAC had a shorter hospital length of stay compared to patients who received warfarin (median 3 days [IQR 2-4] vs. 8 days [IQR 6-10], p < 0.05). This analysis showed that DOACs are being prescribed more than warfarin for treatment of new onset VTE. Renal and liver function may influence the agent prescribed. Utilization of DOACs may decrease the hospital length of stay.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep vein thrombosis; Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs); Pulmonary embolism; Venous thromboembolism; Warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27592341     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-016-1417-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  25 in total

1.  Edoxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Harry R Büller; Hervé Décousus; Michael A Grosso; Michele Mercuri; Saskia Middeldorp; Martin H Prins; Gary E Raskob; Sebastian M Schellong; Lee Schwocho; Annelise Segers; Minggao Shi; Peter Verhamme; Phil Wells
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparison of differences in medical costs when new oral anticoagulants are used for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism vs warfarin or placebo in the US.

Authors:  Alpesh Amin; Amanda Bruno; Jeffrey Trocio; Jay Lin; Melissa Lingohr-Smith
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 2.448

3.  Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of single doses of BAY 59-7939, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor.

Authors:  Dagmar Kubitza; Michael Becka; Barbara Voith; Michael Zuehlsdorf; Georg Wensing
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Samuel Z Goldhaber; Henri Bounameaux
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants in patients with cancer-associated acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  T van der Hulle; P L den Exter; J Kooiman; J J M van der Hoeven; M V Huisman; F A Klok
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.824

6.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sam Schulman; Clive Kearon; Ajay K Kakkar; Patrick Mismetti; Sebastian Schellong; Henry Eriksson; David Baanstra; Janet Schnee; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Limitations of traditional anticoagulants.

Authors:  David Hawkins
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.705

8.  Venous thromboembolic events in hospitalised medical patients.

Authors:  Gregory Piazza; John Fanikos; Maksim Zayaruzny; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Medical costs in the US of clinical events associated with oral anticoagulant (OAC) use compared to warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients ≥75 and <75 years of age, based on the ARISTOTLE, RE-LY, and ROCKET-AF trials.

Authors:  Steve Deitelzweig; Alpesh Amin; Yonghua Jing; Dinara Makenbaeva; Daniel Wiederkehr; Jay Lin; John Graham
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 10.  The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Richard H White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

1.  Initiation of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism: impact on time to hospital discharge.

Authors:  Amanda N Basto; Nathan P Fewel; Kim Vo; Eileen M Stock; Mia Ta
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Hospital length of stay in patients initiated on direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for venous thromboembolism: a real-world single-center study.

Authors:  Hisham Badreldin
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Temporal trends in initiation of VKA, rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran for the treatment of venous thromboembolism - A Danish nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Caroline Sindet-Pedersen; Jannik Langtved Pallisgaard; Laila Staerk; Jeffrey S Berger; Morten Lamberts; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Gunnar H Gislason; Jonas Bjerring Olesen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.