Literature DB >> 27592193

Psychometric properties of the 30-m walking test in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from two prospective multicenter cohort studies.

Parker E Bohm1, Michael G Fehlings2, Branko Kopjar3, Lindsay A Tetreault4, Alexander R Vaccaro5, Karen K Anderson1, Paul M Arnold6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The timed 30-m walking test (30MWT) is used in clinical practice and in research to objectively quantify gait impairment. The psychometric properties of 30MWT have not yet been rigorously evaluated.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine test-retest reliability, divergent and convergent validity, and responsiveness to change of the 30MWT in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: A retrospective observational study was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample consisted of patients with symptomatic DCM enrolled in the AOSpine North America or AOSpine International cervical spondylotic myelopathy studies at 26 sites. OUTCOME MEASURES: Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA), Nurick scale, 30MWT, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Short-Form-36 (SF-36v2) physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) were the outcome measures.
METHODS: Data from two prospective multicenter cohort myelopathy studies were merged. Each patient was evaluated at baseline and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Of 757 total patients, 682 (90.09%) attempted to perform the 30MWT at baseline. Of these 682 patients, 602 (88.12%) performed the 30MWT at baseline. One patient was excluded, leaving601 in the analysis. At baseline, 81 of 682 (11.88%) patients were unable to perform the test, and their mJOA, NDI, and SF-36v2 PCS scores were lower compared with those who performed the test at baseline. In patients who performed the 30MWT at baseline, there was very high correlation among the three baseline 30MWT measurements (r=0.9569-0.9919). The 30MWT demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity. It was moderately correlated with the Nurick (r=0.4932), mJOA (r=-0.4424), and SF-36v2 PCS (r=-0.3537) (convergent validity) and poorly correlated with the NDI (r=0.2107) and SF-36v2 MCS (r=-0.1984) (divergent validity). Overall, the 30MWT was not responsive to change (standardized response mean [SRM]=0.30). However, for patients who had a baseline time above the median value of 29 seconds, the SRM was 0.45.
CONCLUSIONS: The 30MWT shows high test-retest reliability and good divergent and convergent validity. It is responsive to change only in patients with more severe myelopathy. The 30MWT is a simple, quick, and affordable test, and should be used as an ancillary test to evaluate gait parameters in patients with DCM.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait impairment; Myelopathy, compressive; Psychometrics; Recovery of function; Reproducibility of results; Spondylosis, cervical; Stenosis, cervical; Task performance and analysis; Time factors; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27592193     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  8 in total

1.  Cone of economy classification: evolution, concept of stability, severity level, and correlation to patient-reported outcome scores.

Authors:  Ram Haddas; Varun Sambhariya; Thomas Kosztowski; Andrew Block; Isador Lieberman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Degenerative cervical myelopathy: Diagnosis and management in primary care.

Authors:  James Milligan; Kayla Ryan; Michael Fehlings; Craig Bauman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Gait assessment tools for degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; Lingxiao Chen; Camila Quel De Oliveira; Arianne P Verhagen; Omprakash Damodaran; David B Anderson
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

Review 4. 

Authors:  James Milligan; Kayla Ryan; Michael Fehlings; Craig Bauman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Surgery for Mild Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Results of the AOSpine North America and International Prospective Multicenter Studies.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Christopher D Witiw; Farshad Nassiri; Muhammad A Akbar; Alireza Mansouri; Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Outcome Measures and Variables Affecting Prognosis of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.

Authors:  Mehmet Zileli; Shradha Maheshwari; Shashank Sharad Kale; Kanwaljeet Garg; Sajesh K Menon; Jutty Parthiban
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

7.  Improving Assessment of Disease Severity and Strategies for Monitoring Progression in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy [AO Spine RECODE-DCM Research Priority Number 4].

Authors:  Lindsay Tetreault; Philip Garwood; Aref-Ali Gharooni; Alvaro Yanez Touzet; Laura Nanna-Lohkamp; Allan Martin; Jefferson Wilson; James S Harrop; James Guest; Brian K Kwon; James Milligan; Alberto Martinez Arizala; K Daniel Riew; Michael G Fehlings; Mark R N Kotter; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Benjamin M Davies
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-12-31

8.  Two surgical strategies for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with kyphotic deformity.

Authors:  Kuang-Ting Yeh; Ing-Ho Chen; Ru-Ping Lee; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Cheng-Huan Peng; Kuan-Lin Liu; Jen-Hung Wang; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.