Literature DB >> 27592120

Late postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: Predictive factors of morbidity and mortality after percutaneous endovascular treatment.

C Gaudon1, J Soussan2, G Louis3, V Moutardier4, E Gregoire5, V Vidal3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of endovascular treatment in patients presenting with late hemorrhage after pancreatectomy (LPPH). MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Between 2008 and 2012, 53 percutaneous arterial procedures were performed in 42 patients with LPPH. There were 27 men and 15 women (mean age, 61.8 years±14.5 [SD]; range: 19-81 years). Clinical and technical success along with frequency of complications associated with the use of different endovascular techniques in patients with and without arterial anatomical variation were assessed.
RESULTS: Clinical success was observed in 35/42 patients (85%). The technical success was 37.5% in patients with anatomical variation versus 82.8% for those with modal anatomy (P=0.003). Repeat bleeding (P=0.029), complications (P=0.013) and mortality (P=0.045) were more frequent in patients with variation of celiac artery than in those with modal anatomy. For hepatic and gastroduodenal artery stump bleeding, the rate of complications was higher (60%) in the group treated by hepatic artery embolization (P=0.028) by comparison with gastroduodenal artery stump selective embolisations or treatments by covered stent. A significant difference in mortality rate was found between patients with anatomical variations of celiac artery (36.4%) and those with normal anatomy (6.5%) (P=0.032).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous endovascular treatment is effective in patients presenting with LPPH. The presence of an anatomical variation of the celiac artery increases the rate of complications and mortality in patients with LPPH.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial embolization; Hemorrhage; Interventional imaging; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pseudoaneurysm

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27592120     DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging        ISSN: 2211-5684            Impact factor:   4.026


  14 in total

Review 1.  Bleeding complications after pancreatic surgery: interventional radiology management.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Biondetti; Enrico Maria Fumarola; Anna Maria Ierardi; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-04

2.  Delayed post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage and bleeding recurrence after percutaneous endovascular treatment: risk factors from a bi-centric study of 307 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Georges Farvacque; Théophile Guilbaud; Anderson Dieudonné Loundou; Ugo Scemamma; Stéphane Victor Berdah; Vincent Moutardier; Mircea Chirica; Olivier Risse; Edouard Girard; David Jérémie Birnbaum
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Incidence and Contemporary Management of Delayed Bleeding Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Joseph R Habib; Shanshan Gao; Ahn Joon Young; Elie Ghabi; Aslam Ejaz; William Burns; Richard Burkhart; Matthew Weiss; Christopher L Wolfgang; John L Cameron; Robert Liddell; Christos Georgiades; Kelvin Hong; Jin He; Kelly J Lafaro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Preventive covered stent placement at the gastroduodenal artery stump in angiogram-negative sentinel hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yuan-Mao Lin; Ethan Yiyang Lin; Hsiuo-Shan Tseng; Rheun-Chuan Lee; Hsuen-En Huang; Shin-E Wang; Yi-Ming Shyr; Chien-An Liu
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-05-26

5.  Heparin-bonded stent graft treatment for major visceral arterial injury after upper abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Benedikt Michael Schaarschmidt; Johannes Boos; Christian Buchbender; Patric Kröpil; Feride Kröpil; Rotem Shlomo Lanzman; Guenter Fürst; Wolfram Trudo Knoefel; Gerald Antoch; Christoph Thomas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage: DSA diagnosis and endovascular treatment.

Authors:  Tan-Yang Zhou; Jun-Hui Sun; Yue-Lin Zhang; Guan-Hui Zhou; Chun-Hui Nie; Tong-Yin Zhu; Sheng-Qun Chen; Bao-Quan Wang; Wei-Lin Wang; Shu-Sen Zheng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-27

7.  Long-term clinical outcomes after endovascular management of ruptured pseudoaneurysm in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yunghun You; Seong Ho Choi; Dong Wook Choi; Jin Seok Heo; In Woong Han; Sunjong Han; Sung Wook Shin; Kwang Bo Park; Hong Suk Park; Sung Ki Cho; Sang Hyup Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 1.859

8.  Efficacy and hepatic complications of three endovascular treatment approaches for delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: evolution over 15 years.

Authors:  Yu-Chien Chang; Kao-Lang Liu; Yu-Cheng Huang; Po-Ting Chen; Yu-Wen Tien; Yen-Heng Lin; Yeun-Chung Chang
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2019-10-22

9.  Postpancreatoduodenectomy Hemorrhage: Association between the Causes and the Severity of the Bleeding.

Authors:  Safi Khuri; Subhi Mansour; Amir Obeid; Ameer Azzam; Guiseppe Borzellino; Yoram Kluger
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-10-02

10.  Systematic review of the incidence, presentation and management of gastroduodenal artery pseudoaneurysm after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  B Brodie; H M Kocher
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.