Literature DB >> 27592084

EEG-based cognitive load of processing events in 3D virtual worlds is lower than processing events in 2D displays.

Alex Dan1, Miriam Reiner2.   

Abstract

Interacting with 2D displays, such as computer screens, smartphones, and TV, is currently a part of our daily routine; however, our visual system is built for processing 3D worlds. We examined the cognitive load associated with a simple and a complex task of learning paper-folding (origami) by observing 2D or stereoscopic 3D displays. While connected to an electroencephalogram (EEG) system, participants watched a 2D video of an instructor demonstrating the paper-folding tasks, followed by a stereoscopic 3D projection of the same instructor (a digital avatar) illustrating identical tasks. We recorded the power of alpha and theta oscillations and calculated the cognitive load index (CLI) as the ratio of the average power of frontal theta (Fz.) and parietal alpha (Pz). The results showed a significantly higher cognitive load index associated with processing the 2D projection as compared to the 3D projection; additionally, changes in the average theta Fz power were larger for the 2D conditions as compared to the 3D conditions, while alpha average Pz power values were similar for 2D and 3D conditions for the less complex task and higher in the 3D state for the more complex task. The cognitive load index was lower for the easier task and higher for the more complex task in 2D and 3D. In addition, participants with lower spatial abilities benefited more from the 3D compared to the 2D display. These findings have implications for understanding cognitive processing associated with 2D and 3D worlds and for employing stereoscopic 3D technology over 2D displays in designing emerging virtual and augmented reality applications.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D virtual reality; Cognitive load; EEG; Social learning VLE

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27592084     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  7 in total

1.  Instructional Design of Virtual Learning Resources for Anatomy Education.

Authors:  Nicolette S Birbara; Nalini Pather
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Transfer of motor skill between virtual reality viewed using a head-mounted display and conventional screen environments.

Authors:  Julia M Juliano; Sook-Lei Liew
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.262

3.  Stereoscopic Rendering via Goggles Elicits Higher Functional Connectivity During Virtual Reality Gaming.

Authors:  Caroline Garcia Forlim; Lukas Bittner; Fariba Mostajeran; Frank Steinicke; Jürgen Gallinat; Simone Kühn
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Impact of Visual Game-Like Features on Cognitive Performance in a Virtual Reality Working Memory Task: Within-Subjects Experiment.

Authors:  Eric Redlinger; Bernhard Glas; Yang Rong
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.143

5.  Assessment of instantaneous cognitive load imposed by educational multimedia using electroencephalography signals.

Authors:  Reza Sarailoo; Kayhan Latifzadeh; S Hamid Amiri; Alireza Bosaghzadeh; Reza Ebrahimpour
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 5.152

6.  Group Decision-Making in Multi-User Immersive Virtual Reality.

Authors:  Ivan Moser; Sandra Chiquet; Sebastian K Strahm; Fred W Mast; Per Bergamin
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2020-08-26

7.  Virtual reality experiences promote autobiographical retrieval mechanisms: Electrophysiological correlates of laboratory and virtual experiences.

Authors:  Joanna Kisker; Thomas Gruber; Benjamin Schöne
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-09-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.