Rena M Steiger1, Sarah A Stoddard2, Jennifer Pierce3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA. Electronic address: renastei@umich.edu. 2. Department of Systems Leadership and Effectiveness, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5482, USA. Electronic address: sastodda@umich.edu. 3. Department of Systems Leadership and Effectiveness, University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 North Ingalls Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5482, USA. Electronic address: ed1051@wayne.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: How adolescents think about their future (i.e., future orientation) impacts their risk-taking behavior. The purpose of the present analysis was to explore whether future orientation (future planning, perceived risk to future goals, and positive future expectations) was associated with nonmedical use of stimulants and analgesics in a sample of high school students. METHODS: Information on future orientation and nonmedical use of prescription drugs (NMUPD) were collected using a paper-and-pencil survey from a sample of 9th-12th grade students in a Midwestern school. RESULTS: Higher perceived risk to future goals and positive future expectations were associated with a lower likelihood of self-reported nonmedical use of stimulants (n=250; OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.83; OR=0.15, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.47, respectively). Only higher perceived risk to future goals was associated with a lower likelihood of self-reported nonmedical use of analgesics (n=250; OR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.68). In a follow-up analysis limited to students who endorsed alcohol or marijuana use, perceived risk to future goals remained associated with a lower likelihood of nonmedical use of stimulants and analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that risk perception might be a salient protective factor against both nonmedical use of stimulants and analgesics. Overall, the differential impact of conceptualizations of future orientation might depend on the class of prescription drug used, demonstrating a need to consider prescription drugs individually in the development of future studies and interventions. Copyright Â
INTRODUCTION: How adolescents think about their future (i.e., future orientation) impacts their risk-taking behavior. The purpose of the present analysis was to explore whether future orientation (future planning, perceived risk to future goals, and positive future expectations) was associated with nonmedical use of stimulants and analgesics in a sample of high school students. METHODS: Information on future orientation and nonmedical use of prescription drugs (NMUPD) were collected using a paper-and-pencil survey from a sample of 9th-12th grade students in a Midwestern school. RESULTS: Higher perceived risk to future goals and positive future expectations were associated with a lower likelihood of self-reported nonmedical use of stimulants (n=250; OR=0.46, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.83; OR=0.15, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.47, respectively). Only higher perceived risk to future goals was associated with a lower likelihood of self-reported nonmedical use of analgesics (n=250; OR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.68). In a follow-up analysis limited to students who endorsed alcohol or marijuana use, perceived risk to future goals remained associated with a lower likelihood of nonmedical use of stimulants and analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that risk perception might be a salient protective factor against both nonmedical use of stimulants and analgesics. Overall, the differential impact of conceptualizations of future orientation might depend on the class of prescription drug used, demonstrating a need to consider prescription drugs individually in the development of future studies and interventions. Copyright Â
Authors: Chelsea M Reynolds; Michael Gradisar; Kellyann Kar; Ashleigh Perry; Jasper Wolfe; Michelle A Short Journal: Acta Paediatr Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 2.299
Authors: Carrie D Patnode; Elizabeth O'Connor; Maya Rowland; Brittany U Burda; Leslie A Perdue; Evelyn P Whitlock Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Elizabeth Barnett; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jennifer B Unger; Louise Ann Rohrbach; Ping Sun; Steve Sussman Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Rebecca M Cunningham; Stephen T Chermack; Peter F Ehrlich; Patrick M Carter; Brenda M Booth; Frederic C Blow; Kristen L Barry; Maureen A Walton Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Melissa A Lewis; Dana M Litt; Kevin M King; Tracey A Garcia; Katja A Waldron; Christine M Lee Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Alison L Miller; Sharon L Lo; Dana Albright; Joyce M Lee; Christine M Hunter; Katherine W Bauer; Rosalind King; Katy M Clark; Kiren Chaudhry; Niko Kaciroti; Benjamin Katz; Emily M Fredericks Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2020-03-07 Impact factor: 2.125