Literature DB >> 27591844

Physical-chemical evaluation of hydraulic fracturing chemicals in the context of produced water treatment.

Mary Kay Camarillo1, Jeremy K Domen2, William T Stringfellow3.   

Abstract

Produced water is a significant waste stream that can be treated and reused; however, the removal of production chemicals-such as those added in hydraulic fracturing-must be addressed. One motivation for treating and reusing produced water is that current disposal methods-typically consisting of deep well injection and percolation in infiltration pits-are being limited. Furthermore, oil and gas production often occurs in arid regions where there is demand for new water sources. In this paper, hydraulic fracturing chemical additive data from California are used as a case study where physical-chemical and biodegradation data are summarized and used to screen for appropriate produced water treatment technologies. The data indicate that hydraulic fracturing chemicals are largely treatable; however, data are missing for 24 of the 193 chemical additives identified. More than one-third of organic chemicals have data indicating biodegradability, suggesting biological treatment would be effective. Adsorption-based methods and partitioning of chemicals into oil for subsequent separation is expected to be effective for approximately one-third of chemicals. Volatilization-based treatment methods (e.g. air stripping) will only be effective for approximately 10% of chemicals. Reverse osmosis is a good catch-all with over 70% of organic chemicals expected to be removed efficiently. Other technologies such as electrocoagulation and advanced oxidation are promising but lack demonstration. Chemicals of most concern due to prevalence, toxicity, and lack of data include propargyl alcohol, 2-mercaptoethyl alcohol, tetrakis hydroxymethyl-phosphonium sulfate, thioglycolic acid, 2-bromo-3-nitrilopropionamide, formaldehyde polymers, polymers of acrylic acid, quaternary ammonium compounds, and surfactants (e.g. ethoxylated alcohols). Future studies should examine the fate of hydraulic fracturing chemicals in produced water treatment trains to demonstrate removal and clarify interactions between upstream and downstream processes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydraulic fracturing; Oil and gas production; Produced water; Wastewater treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27591844     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  4 in total

Review 1.  Organic Pollutants in Shale Gas Flowback and Produced Waters: Identification, Potential Ecological Impact, and Implications for Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Andrii Butkovskyi; Harry Bruning; Stefan A E Kools; Huub H M Rijnaarts; Annemarie P Van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Common Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Additives Alter the Structure and Function of Anaerobic Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Adam C Mumford; Denise M Akob; J Grace Klinges; Isabelle M Cozzarelli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of chemical-use between hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, and routine oil and gas development.

Authors:  William T Stringfellow; Mary Kay Camarillo; Jeremy K Domen; Seth B C Shonkoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Superhydrophilic Functionalization of Microfiltration Ceramic Membranes Enables Separation of Hydrocarbons from Frac and Produced Water.

Authors:  Samuel J Maguire-Boyle; Joseph E Huseman; Thomas J Ainscough; Darren L Oatley-Radcliffe; Abdullah A Alabdulkarem; Sattam Fahad Al-Mojil; Andrew R Barron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.