Literature DB >> 27591819

Dose-dependent association between muscle-strengthening activities and all-cause mortality: Prospective cohort study among a national sample of adults in the USA.

Scott J Dankel1, Jeremy P Loenneke1, Paul D Loprinzi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have a limited understanding of the association between behavioural participation in muscle-strengthening activities (MSA) and all-cause mortality. AIM: To determine the effect of MSA on all-cause mortality, and examine a potential dose-response relationship between the frequency with which MSA are performed and the incidence of all-cause mortality.
METHODS: Individuals (8772 adults aged≥20years) from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey were evaluated for baseline characteristics, then followed for an average of 6.7years. MSA were assessed at baseline as the number of self-reported sessions completed within the past 30days. Analyses were performed in 2015.
RESULTS: Only 18.6% of individuals met MSA guidelines (2-3 MSA sessions/week) at baseline, while those performing any form of MSA had a 23% reduced risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.98; P=0.04). Additionally, we created a five-category variable to determine whether a dose-response relationship existed between MSA and premature mortality; only individuals performing 8-14 sessions over a 30-day period (current MSA guidelines) had a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.70; P=0.02). Results were similar for CVD-specific mortality.
CONCLUSION: The national recommendations that 2-3 MSA sessions be performed per week appear to be most effective at reducing the risk of premature all-cause mortality; however, despite these recommendations, the majority of the adult population in the USA still fails to perform any MSA. Future studies should determine strategies for increasing adherence to these established guidelines. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Exercice physique; Exercice physique en résistance et en force; Health promotion; Institut de la santé; NHANES; Promotion de la santé; Resistance training; Strength; Épidémiologie

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27591819     DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 1875-2128            Impact factor:   2.340


  6 in total

1.  The Generality of Strength: Relationship between Different Measures of Muscular Strength in Older Women.

Authors:  JoÃo Pedro Nunes; Paolo M Cunha; Melissa Antunes; Bruna D V Costa; Witalo Kassiano; Gabriel Kunevaliki; Alex S Ribeiro; Edilson S Cyrino
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Effects of resistance training on muscle strength, insulin-like growth factor-1, and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 in healthy elderly subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Niloufar Amiri; Mehrdad Fathei; Mohammad Mosaferi Ziaaldini
Journal:  Hormones (Athens)       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.885

Review 3.  Muscle-strengthening activities are associated with lower risk and mortality in major non-communicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Haruki Momma; Ryoko Kawakami; Takanori Honda; Susumu S Sawada
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 18.473

4.  The epidemiology of aerobic physical activity and muscle-strengthening activity guideline adherence among 383,928 U.S. adults.

Authors:  Jason A Bennie; Katrien De Cocker; Megan J Teychenne; Wendy J Brown; Stuart J H Biddle
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  The epidemiology of muscle-strengthening exercise in Europe: A 28-country comparison including 280,605 adults.

Authors:  Jason A Bennie; Katrien De Cocker; Jordan J Smith; Glen H Wiesner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Who is meeting the strengthening physical activity guidelines by definition: A cross-sectional study of 253 423 English adults?

Authors:  Gavin R H Sandercock; Jason Moran; Daniel D Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.