Literature DB >> 27591817

Epizootics in Industrial Livestock Production: Preventable Gaps in Biosecurity and Biocontainment.

J H Leibler1, K Dalton2, A Pekosz3, G C Gray4, E K Silbergeld2.   

Abstract

While technological advances in animal husbandry have facilitated increases in global meat production, the high density and geographic concentration of food animal production facilities pose risks of infectious disease transmission. The scale of the 2014-2015 highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N2 outbreak in the United States demonstrates the challenges in achieving pathogen control within and around industrial animal facilities using existing technologies. We discuss gaps in current practice in two specific systems within these facilities - ventilation and waste management - which are under-recognized as important drivers of microbial porosity. The development of innovative ventilation systems to reduce influx and efflux of pathogens is critically needed, and cross-sectoral partnerships should be incentivized to do so. Adapting current human biosolid treatment technologies for farm applications, reducing animal stocking density and shifting waste management responsibility from farmer to corporation would reduce risk from current manure management systems. While innovative approaches to functionally altering the industrial food animal production system remain important priorities to promote sustainability, our intention here is to identify gaps within the current system that allow for pathogen emergence and transmission and address specific areas in which technological, administrative or policy changes are necessary to mitigate these risks.
© 2016 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avian influenza; agriculture; animal husbandry; manure; ventilation; zoonoses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27591817     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  5 in total

1.  Pandemics and food systems - towards a proactive food safety approach to disease prevention & management.

Authors:  Anaka Aiyar; Prabhu Pingali
Journal:  Food Secur       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.304

2.  Evaluating biological plausibility in supporting evidence for action through systematic reviews in public health.

Authors:  J Dailey; L Rosman; E K Silbergeld
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.427

3.  Lead exposure to children from consumption of backyard chicken eggs.

Authors:  Jessica H Leibler; Komal Basra; Thomas Ireland; Alyssa McDonagh; Catherine Ressijac; Wendy Heiger-Bernays; Donna Vorhees; Marieke Rosenbaum
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 8.431

4.  Screening food-borne and zoonotic pathogens associated with livestock practices in the Sumapaz region, Cundinamarca, Colombia.

Authors:  Nelson E Arenas; Diego A Abril; Paola Valencia; Surabhi Khandige; Carlos Yesid Soto; Vilma Moreno-Melo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 5.  Probiotics and Postbiotics as Substitutes of Antibiotics in Farm Animals: A Review.

Authors:  Daria Zamojska; Adriana Nowak; Ireneusz Nowak; Ewa Macierzyńska-Piotrowska
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.