Literature DB >> 27591537

Comparison of two silica-based extraction methods for DNA isolation from bones.

Jessica Rothe1, Marion Nagy2.   

Abstract

One of the most demanding DNA extractions is from bones and teeth due to the robustness of the material and the relatively low DNA content. The greatest challenge is due to the manifold nature of the material, which is defined by various factors, including age, storage, environmental conditions, and contamination with inhibitors. However, most published protocols do not distinguish between different types or qualities of bone material, but are described as being generally applicable. Our laboratory works with two different extraction methods based on silica membranes or the use of silica beads. We compared the amplification success of the two methods from bone samples with different qualities and in the presence of inhibitors. We found that the DNA extraction using the silica membrane method results an in higher DNA yield but also in a higher risk of co-extracting impurities, which can act as inhibitors. In contrast the silica beads method shows decreased co-extraction of inhibitors but also less DNA yield. Related to our own experiences it has to be considered that each bone material should be reviewed independently regarding the analysis and extraction method. Therefore, the most ambitious task is determining the quality of the bone material, which requires substantial experience.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bones; DNA extraction; Sample quality; Silica beads; Silica membrane

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27591537     DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)        ISSN: 1344-6223            Impact factor:   1.376


  1 in total

1.  Optimization of DNA extraction from dental remains.

Authors:  Concetta Cafiero; Agnese Re; Egidio Stigliano; Ezio Bassotti; Rossana Moroni; Cristina Grippaudo
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.535

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.