H Ensaff1, R Crawford1, J M Russell2, M E Barker1. 1. Human Nutrition Unit, Department of Oncology, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, SheffieldS10 2RX, UK. 2. Corporate Information and Computing Services, University of Sheffield, SheffieldS10 2HB, UK.
Abstract
Background: Primary schools are increasingly used as arenas for public health initiatives. The aim of this study was to assess a primary school-based food intervention. Methods: The intervention comprised timetabled kitchen classroom sessions (90 min, fortnightly). Pupils prepared and cooked food, which they then ate together. Children's relationship with food, including food enjoyment, experience and food neophobia, were addressed at the intervention school (baseline n = 154; follow-up n = 164) and at a matched control school (baseline n = 171; follow-up n = 174). Results: Pupils at the intervention school scored significantly higher (M = 3.90, SD = 1.81) for scores on Kitchen Equipment, compared to the control school (M = 3.06, SD = 2.12); and again scored significantly higher (M = 9.34, SD = 3.79) for the overall Cooking Experience Score compared to the control school (M = 7.98, SD = 4.57). Shifts accompanying the intervention in three outcome measures for pupils (taste description, liking for cooking and helping with cooking at home) were also revealed. No main intervention effect for food neophobia and fussiness was found; a close to significant time by intervention interaction (P = 0.053) was evident. Conclusions: The study indicates limited but encouraging changes, and contributes to the growing literature regarding school-based food initiatives.
Background: Primary schools are increasingly used as arenas for public health initiatives. The aim of this study was to assess a primary school-based food intervention. Methods: The intervention comprised timetabled kitchen classroom sessions (90 min, fortnightly). Pupils prepared and cooked food, which they then ate together. Children's relationship with food, including food enjoyment, experience and food neophobia, were addressed at the intervention school (baseline n = 154; follow-up n = 164) and at a matched control school (baseline n = 171; follow-up n = 174). Results: Pupils at the intervention school scored significantly higher (M = 3.90, SD = 1.81) for scores on Kitchen Equipment, compared to the control school (M = 3.06, SD = 2.12); and again scored significantly higher (M = 9.34, SD = 3.79) for the overall Cooking Experience Score compared to the control school (M = 7.98, SD = 4.57). Shifts accompanying the intervention in three outcome measures for pupils (taste description, liking for cooking and helping with cooking at home) were also revealed. No main intervention effect for food neophobia and fussiness was found; a close to significant time by intervention interaction (P = 0.053) was evident. Conclusions: The study indicates limited but encouraging changes, and contributes to the growing literature regarding school-based food initiatives.
Authors: Annemarie E Bennett; David Mockler; Cara Cunningham; Corina Glennon-Slattery; Charlotte Johnston Molloy Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2021-11-23