Literature DB >> 27591269

Are process performance measures associated with clinical outcomes among patients with hip fractures? A population-based cohort study.

Pia Kjaer Kristensen1,2, Theis Muncholm Thillemann3, Kjeld Søballe3, Søren Paaske Johnsen4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between process performance measures and clinical outcome among patients with hip fracture.
DESIGN: Nationwide, population-based follow-up study.
SETTING: Public Danish hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 25 354 patients 65 years or older who were admitted with a hip fracture in Denmark between 2010 and 2013. INTERVENTION: The process performance measures, including systematic pain assessment, early mobilization, basic mobility assessment at arrival and at discharge, post-discharge rehabilitation program, anti-osteoporotic medication and prevention of future fall accidents measures, were analysed individually as well as an opportunity-based score defined as the proportion of all relevant performance measures fulfilled for the individual patient (0-50%, 50-75% and 75-100%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day mortality, 30-day readmission after discharge and length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: Fulfilling 75-100% of the relevant process performance measures was associated with lower 30-day mortality (22.6% vs. 8.5%, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.31 (95% CI: 0.28-0.35)) and lower odds for readmission (21.7% vs. 17.4%, adjusted OR 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.87)). The overall opportunity score for quality of care was not associated with LOS (adjusted OR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.04)). Mobilization within 24 h postoperatively was the process with the strongest association with lower 30-day mortality, readmission risk and shorter LOS.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher quality of in-hospital care and in particular early mobilization was associated with a better clinical outcome, including lower 30-day mortality, among patients with hip fracture.
© The Author 2016 Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27591269     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  17 in total

Review 1.  Orthogeriatric co-management for the care of older subjects with hip fracture: recommendations from an Italian intersociety consensus.

Authors:  Antonio De Vincentis; Astrid Ursula Behr; Giuseppe Bellelli; Marco Bravi; Anna Castaldo; Lucia Galluzzo; Giovanni Iolascon; Stefania Maggi; Emilio Martini; Alberto Momoli; Graziano Onder; Marco Paoletta; Luca Pietrogrande; Mauro Roselli; Mauro Ruggeri; Carmelinda Ruggiero; Fabio Santacaterina; Luigi Tritapepe; Amedeo Zurlo; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Excess risk of venous thromboembolism in hip fracture patients and the prognostic impact of comorbidity.

Authors:  A B Pedersen; V Ehrenstein; S K Szépligeti; H T Sørensen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Socioeconomic inequality in clinical outcome among hip fracture patients: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  P K Kristensen; T M Thillemann; A B Pedersen; K Søballe; S P Johnsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Geographic variation in hip fracture surgery rate, care quality and outcomes: a comparison between national registries in Ireland and Denmark.

Authors:  Mary E Walsh; Jan Sorensen; Catherine Blake; Søren Paaske Johnsen; Pia Kjær Kristensen
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.879

Review 5.  Surgical Technical Evidence Review of Hip Fracture Surgery Conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.

Authors:  Anaar Siletz; Christopher P Childers; Claire Faltermeier; Emily S Singer; Q Lina Hu; Clifford Y Ko; Stephen L Kates; Melinda Maggard-Gibbons; Elizabeth Wick
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2018-05-20

6.  Quality indicators for hip fracture care, a systematic review.

Authors:  S C Voeten; P Krijnen; D M Voeten; J H Hegeman; M W J M Wouters; I B Schipper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Delay in surgery, risk of hospital-treated infections and the prognostic impact of comorbidity in hip fracture patients. A Danish nationwide cohort study, 2005-2016.

Authors:  Eva N Glassou; Kaja Ke Kjørholt; Torben B Hansen; Alma B Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Hospital differences in mortality rates after hip fracture surgery in Denmark.

Authors:  Pia Kjær Kristensen; Juan Merlo; Nermin Ghith; George Leckie; Søren Paaske Johnsen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Mortality and readmission following hip fracture surgery: a retrospective study comparing conventional and fast-track care.

Authors:  Kristin Haugan; Lars G Johnsen; Trude Basso; Olav A Foss
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Association between patient outcomes and accreditation in US hospitals: observational study.

Authors:  Miranda B Lam; Jose F Figueroa; Yevgeniy Feyman; Kimberly E Reimold; E John Orav; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.