| Literature DB >> 27591097 |
Brandon S Sheffield1, Regan Fulton2, Steve E Kalloger3, Katy Milne4, Georgia Geller5, Martin Jones6, Celine Jacquemont2, Susanna Zachara3, Eric Zhao6, Erin Pleasance6, Janessa Laskin5, Steven J M Jones6, Marco A Marra6, Stephen Yip3, Brad H Nelson4, Allen M Gown2, Cheryl Ho5, Diana N Ionescu7.
Abstract
Inhibitors of the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) signaling axis have recently demonstrated efficacy and are rapidly being incorporated into the treatment of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). Despite clear benefits to certain patients, the association of these responses with a predictive biomarker remains uncertain. Several different biomarkers have been proposed, with differing results and conclusions. This study compares multiple methods of biomarker testing for treatment of NSCLCs with PD1-axis inhibitors. Tissue microarrays of matched primary and metastatic NSCLCs were used to compare four different PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) IHC techniques, as well as RNA ISH. Additional cases with whole genome and transcriptome data were assessed for molecular correlates of PD-L1 overexpression. Eighty cases were included in the IHC study. Multiple IHC methodologies showed a high rate of agreement (Kappa = 0.67). When calibrated to RNA expression, agreement improved significantly (Kappa = 0.90, p=0.0049). PD-L1 status of primary and metastatic tumors was discordant in 17 (22%) cases. This study suggests that different IHC methodologies for PD-L1 assessment provide slightly different results. There is significant discordance between the PD-L1 status of primary tumors and lymph node metastases. RNA ISH may be a useful adjunct to complement PD-L1 IHC testing.Entities:
Keywords: NSCLC; PD-1; PD-L1; biomarker; immunotherapy; lung cancer; non–small cell lung carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27591097 PMCID: PMC5037503 DOI: 10.1369/0022155416665338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Histochem Cytochem ISSN: 0022-1554 Impact factor: 2.479