Literature DB >> 27590965

From classic motor imagery to complex movement intention decoding: The noninvasive Graz-BCI approach.

G R Müller-Putz1, A Schwarz2, J Pereira2, P Ofner2.   

Abstract

In this chapter, we give an overview of the Graz-BCI research, from the classic motor imagery detection to complex movement intentions decoding. We start by describing the classic motor imagery approach, its application in tetraplegic end users, and the significant improvements achieved using coadaptive brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). These strategies have the drawback of not mirroring the way one plans a movement. To achieve a more natural control-and to reduce the training time-the movements decoded by the BCI need to be closely related to the user's intention. Within this natural control, we focus on the kinematic level, where movement direction and hand position or velocity can be decoded from noninvasive recordings. First, we review movement execution decoding studies, where we describe the decoding algorithms, their performance, and associated features. Second, we describe the major findings in movement imagination decoding, where we emphasize the importance of estimating the sources of the discriminative features. Third, we introduce movement target decoding, which could allow the determination of the target without knowing the exact movement-by-movement details. Aside from the kinematic level, we also address the goal level, which contains relevant information on the upcoming action. Focusing on hand-object interaction and action context dependency, we discuss the possible impact of some recent neurophysiological findings in the future of BCI control. Ideally, the goal and the kinematic decoding would allow an appropriate matching of the BCI to the end users' needs, overcoming the limitations of the classic motor imagery approach.
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Brain–computer interface; Decoding; EEG; Motor imagery; Movement intention; Natural control; Neuroprosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27590965     DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  10 in total

1.  Neurofeedback Training of Alpha Relative Power Improves the Performance of Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Qing Zhou; Ruidong Cheng; Lin Yao; Xiangming Ye; Kedi Xu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.473

2.  EEG neural correlates of goal-directed movement intention.

Authors:  Joana Pereira; Patrick Ofner; Andreas Schwarz; Andreea Ioana Sburlea; Gernot R Müller-Putz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  EEG patterns of self-paced movement imaginations towards externally-cued and internally-selected targets.

Authors:  Joana Pereira; Andreea Ioana Sburlea; Gernot R Müller-Putz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Multiclass Classification Based on Combined Motor Imageries.

Authors:  Cecilia Lindig-León; Sébastien Rimbert; Laurent Bougrain
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Applying Dimensionality Reduction Techniques in Source-Space Electroencephalography via Template and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Head Models to Continuously Decode Hand Trajectories.

Authors:  Nitikorn Srisrisawang; Gernot R Müller-Putz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Analysis of the Relationship Between Motor Imagery and Age-Related Fatigue for CNN Classification of the EEG Data.

Authors:  Xiangyun Li; Peng Chen; Xi Yu; Ning Jiang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.702

7.  Decoding Imagined 3D Hand Movement Trajectories From EEG: Evidence to Support the Use of Mu, Beta, and Low Gamma Oscillations.

Authors:  Attila Korik; Ronen Sosnik; Nazmul Siddique; Damien Coyle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Utilizing sensory prediction errors for movement intention decoding: A new methodology.

Authors:  Gowrishankar Ganesh; Keigo Nakamura; Supat Saetia; Alejandra Mejia Tobar; Eiichi Yoshida; Hideyuki Ando; Natsue Yoshimura; Yasuharu Koike
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Decoding Voluntary Movement of Single Hand Based on Analysis of Brain Connectivity by Using EEG Signals.

Authors:  Ting Li; Tao Xue; Baozeng Wang; Jinhua Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Direct comparison of supervised and semi-supervised retraining approaches for co-adaptive BCIs.

Authors:  Andreas Schwarz; Julia Brandstetter; Joana Pereira; Gernot R Müller-Putz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 2.602

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.