Geoff Davies1,2, David Fowler1,2, Kathryn Greenwood1,2. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK. 2. R&D department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.
Abstract
Background: Neurocognitive and functional outcome deficits have long been acknowledged in schizophrenia and neurocognition has been found to account for functional disability to a greater extent than psychopathology. Much of the variance in functional outcome however still remains unexplained and metacognition may mediate the relationship between neurocognition, functional capacity, and self-reported social and occupational function. Method: Eighty first episode psychosis participants were recruited and completed measures of neurocognition (memory, executive function, and intelligence quotient), metacognition (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, Metacognitive Awareness Interview), psychopathology (PANSS), and both functional capacity (UPSA) and real-life social and occupational function (The Time Use Survey). Path analyses investigated the relationships between variables through structural equation modeling. Results: A series of path models demonstrated that metacognition partially mediates the relationship between neurocognition and functional capacity, and fully mediates the relationship between functional capacity and social and occupational function. Conclusion: The present study findings identify that metacognition may be critical to translating cognitive and functional skills into real-world contexts, and this relationship is found at early stages of illness. Understanding how individuals translate cognitive and functional skills into the real-world (the competence-performance gap) may offer valuable guidance to intervention programs. This finding is important to models of recovery as it suggests that intervention programs that focus on enhancing metacognition abilities may have a greater impact than traditional rehabilitation programs focusing on cognitive abilities, on social and occupational outcomes.
Background: Neurocognitive and functional outcome deficits have long been acknowledged in schizophrenia and neurocognition has been found to account for functional disability to a greater extent than psychopathology. Much of the variance in functional outcome however still remains unexplained and metacognition may mediate the relationship between neurocognition, functional capacity, and self-reported social and occupational function. Method: Eighty first episode psychosisparticipants were recruited and completed measures of neurocognition (memory, executive function, and intelligence quotient), metacognition (Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, Metacognitive Awareness Interview), psychopathology (PANSS), and both functional capacity (UPSA) and real-life social and occupational function (The Time Use Survey). Path analyses investigated the relationships between variables through structural equation modeling. Results: A series of path models demonstrated that metacognition partially mediates the relationship between neurocognition and functional capacity, and fully mediates the relationship between functional capacity and social and occupational function. Conclusion: The present study findings identify that metacognition may be critical to translating cognitive and functional skills into real-world contexts, and this relationship is found at early stages of illness. Understanding how individuals translate cognitive and functional skills into the real-world (the competence-performance gap) may offer valuable guidance to intervention programs. This finding is important to models of recovery as it suggests that intervention programs that focus on enhancing metacognition abilities may have a greater impact than traditional rehabilitation programs focusing on cognitive abilities, on social and occupational outcomes.
Authors: Paul H Lysaker; Giancarlo Dimaggio; Phoebe Daroyanni; Kelly D Buck; Valerie A LaRocco; Antonino Carcione; Giuseppe Nicolò Journal: Psychol Psychother Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 3.915
Authors: Paul H Lysaker; Giancarlo Dimaggio; Kelly D Buck; Antonino Carcione; Giuseppe Nicolò Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jo Hodgekins; Paul French; Max Birchwood; Miranda Mugford; Rose Christopher; Max Marshall; Linda Everard; Helen Lester; Peter Jones; Tim Amos; Swaran Singh; Vimal Sharma; Anthony P Morrison; David Fowler Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: John Stirling; Colin White; Shon Lewis; Richard Hopkins; Digby Tantam; Alice Huddy; Linda Montague Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Barton W Palmer; Raeanne C Moore; Lisa T Eyler; Luz L Pinto; Elyn R Saks; Dilip V Jeste Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 4.939