Literature DB >> 27590218

Edoxaban versus enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial.

Andreas Goette1, Jose L Merino2, Michael D Ezekowitz3, Dmitry Zamoryakhin4, Michael Melino5, James Jin6, Michele F Mercuri5, Michael A Grosso5, Victor Fernandez5, Naab Al-Saady7, Natalya Pelekh8, Bela Merkely9, Sergey Zenin10, Mykola Kushnir11, Jindrich Spinar12, Valeriy Batushkin13, Joris R de Groot14, Gregory Y H Lip15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Edoxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is non-inferior for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and is associated with less bleeding than well controlled warfarin therapy. Few safety data about edoxaban in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion are available.
METHODS: We did a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint evaluation trial in 19 countries with 239 sites comparing edoxaban 60 mg per day with enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation. The dose of edoxaban was reduced to 30 mg per day if one or more factors (creatinine clearance 15-50 mL/min, low bodyweight [≤60 kg], or concomitant use of P-glycoprotein inhibitors) were present. Block randomisation (block size four)-stratified by cardioversion approach (transoesophageal echocardiography [TEE] or not), anticoagulant experience, selected edoxaban dose, and region-was done through a voice-web system. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of stroke, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality, analysed by intention to treat. The primary safety endpoint was major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Follow-up was 28 days on study drug after cardioversion plus 30 days to assess safety. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02072434.
FINDINGS: Between March 25, 2014, and Oct 28, 2015, 2199 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive edoxaban (n=1095) or enoxaparin-warfarin (n=1104). The mean age was 64 years (SD 10·54) and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2·6 (SD 1·4). Mean time in therapeutic range on warfarin was 70·8% (SD 27·4). The primary efficacy endpoint occurred in five (<1%) patients in the edoxaban group versus 11 (1%) in the enoxaparin-warfarin group (odds ratio [OR] 0·46, 95% CI 0·12-1·43). The primary safety endpoint occurred in 16 (1%) of 1067 patients given edoxaban versus 11 (1%) of 1082 patients given enoxaparin-warfarin (OR 1·48, 95% CI 0·64-3·55). The results were independent of the TEE-guided strategy and anticoagulation status.
INTERPRETATION: ENSURE-AF is the largest prospective randomised clinical trial of anticoagulation for cardioversion of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Rates of major and CRNM bleeding and thromboembolism were low in the two treatment groups. FUNDING: Daiichi Sankyo provided financial support for the study.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27590218     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31474-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  59 in total

1.  [Non-vitamin K dependent oral anticoagulants : What is important in intensive care medicine].

Authors:  D C Gulba; L Broscaru
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  Direct oral anti-coagulants compared to vitamin-K antagonists in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Natale Daniele Brunetti; Nicola Tarantino; Luisa De Gennaro; Michele Correale; Francesco Santoro; Matteo Di Biase
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Transient or extended reversal of apixaban anticoagulation by andexanet alfa is equally effective in a porcine polytrauma model.

Authors:  Oliver Grottke; Till Braunschweig; Rolf Rossaint; Necib Akman; Janet M Leeds; Pamela B Conley; Markus Honickel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Babikir Kheiri; Tarek Haykal; Ahmed Abdalla; Mohammed Osman; Sahar Ahmed; Khansa Osman; Ghassan Bachuwa; Mustafa Hassan; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Anticoagulation of Cardiovascular Conditions in the Cancer Patient: Review of Old and New Therapies.

Authors:  Isaac B Rhea; Alexander R Lyon; Michael G Fradley
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Clinical outcomes after AF cardioversion in patients presenting left atrial sludge in trans-esophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Fabien Squara; Mikael Bres; Didier Scarlatti; Pamela Moceri; Emile Ferrari
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation : Current evidence and guideline recommendations.

Authors:  J W Erath; S H Hohnloser
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Anticoagulation therapy: Use of edoxaban in cardioversion for AF.

Authors:  Gregory B Lim
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Evolving cardiovascular uses of direct-acting oral anticoagulants: a paradigm shift on the horizon?

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Matteo Bianchin; Cecilia Fantoni; Walter Ageno; Fabrizio De Ponti; Roberto De Ponti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.397

10.  Practical Implementation of Anticoagulation Strategy for Patients Undergoing Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Andreas Goette; Hein Heidbuchel
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.