Literature DB >> 27590106

An Open-Label Phase II Randomized Trial of Topical Dexamethasone and Tacrolimus Solutions for the Treatment of Oral Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

Nathaniel Treister1, Shuli Li2, Haesook Kim2, Mark Lerman3, Ahmed Sultan4, Edwin P Alyea5, Philippe Armand5, Corey Cutler5, Vincent Ho5, John Koreth5, Joseph H Antin5, Robert Soiffer5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-agent dexamethasone or tacrolimus topical solution as first-line treatment for symptomatic oral chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). This was a prospective, single-center, open-label, randomized phase II trial of patients with symptomatic oral cGVHD without prior topical therapy. Subjects were randomly assigned 1:1 to either topical dexamethasone (.5 mg/mL) or tacrolimus (.5 mg/mL) solution and instructed to rinse with 5 mL for 5 minutes, 4 times a day, for 4 weeks. Oral cGVHD assessments (National Institutes of Health [NIH] criteria) were completed at baseline and end of treatment (NIH criteria, global response, and tolerability). The primary endpoint was the response rate defined as ≥3-point reduction in patient-reported sensitivity score (range, 0 to 10). A parallel 2-stage design was employed so that a less efficacious arm could be terminated early. The accrual goal was 60 evaluable patients; 30 in each arm), accruing 14 in the first stage and 16 in the second stage. If both arms were regarded as efficacious, a "pick-the-winner" method would be employed to choose a better treatment for future investigation. Forty-six subjects were randomized to receive either dexamethasone (n = 28) or tacrolimus (n = 18). Six subjects were excluded from the analysis because of changes in systemic immunosuppression (dexamethasone  = 1, tacrolimus  = 3) or lack of end-of-treatment visit (1 per arm). After the first stage evaluation, the tacrolimus arm was terminated because of lack of activity (3 of 14 responses; response rate, 21%). Twenty-six subjects in the dexamethasone arm completed both study visits and were included in the response analysis, with a 58% (15 of 26) response rate, compared with 21% (3 of 14) in the tacrolimus arm (P = .05). The response rates according to the NIH score in the dexamethasone and tacrolimus arms were 50% (13 of 26) and 2% (2 of 14), respectively (P = .04). From the onset of therapy, 31% versus 21% patients reported feeling "much better" and 38% versus 36% reported feeling "slightly better," giving an overall global response rate ("much better" or "slightly better") of 81% (21 of 26) versus 71% (10 of 14), in the dexamethasone and tacrolimus arms, respectively. Dexamethasone rinses were well tolerated and taste was reported as "very pleasant" or "tolerable" in most subjects (96%). Intensive topical therapy with dexamethasone solution is effective for managing patients with new-onset symptomatic oral cGVHD and should be considered for first-line therapy. Topical tacrolimus solution appears less effective, at least for first-line therapy.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ancillary care; Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); Oral chronic GVHD; Oral medicine; Supportive care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27590106     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  6 in total

Review 1.  Oral Complications of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Authors:  Jane M Fall-Dickson; Steven Z Pavletic; Jacqueline W Mays; Mark M Schubert
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2019-08-01

Review 2.  How I treat refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Authors:  Stefanie Sarantopoulos; Adela R Cardones; Keith M Sullivan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Oral Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Authors:  David Dean; Herve Sroussi
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-05-20

4.  Immunohistopathological characterization and the impact of topical immunomodulatory therapy in oral chronic graft-versus-host disease: A pilot study.

Authors:  Acf Motta; Q Zhan; A Larson; M Lerman; S-B Woo; R J Soiffer; G F Murphy; N S Treister
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.511

Review 5.  Oral Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Pictorial Review and a Guide for Dental Practitioners.

Authors:  Sharon Elad; Omar Aljitawi; Yehuda Zadik
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.607

6.  Topical Corticosteroids a Viable Solution for Oral Graft Versus Host Disease? A Systematic Insight on Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Arin Sava; Andra Piciu; Sergiu Pasca; Alexandru Mester; Ciprian Tomuleasa
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.