Literature DB >> 27590057

Prevention of re-obstruction in watery eye treatment: three-flap technique in external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Hirohiko Kakizaki1, Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi2, Yasuhiro Takahashi2, Jacqueline Mupas-Uy2, Hidenori Mito2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the surgical outcome of three-flap external dacryocystorhinostomy (3-flap ex-DCR) based on the most common site of granulation occurrence in no-flap endonasal DCR (no-flap en-DCR).
METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. We first examined the location of granulation occurrence in the osteotomy site using nasal endoscopy after no-flap en-DCR on 53 sides of 37 patients (5 male, 32 female) with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Based on the results of this surgery, we performed 3-flap ex-DCR on 70 sides of 61 patients (18 male, 43 female) with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Anatomical success was defined as no reflux under lacrimal irrigation and a patent osteotomy site under nasal endoscopic examination at postoperative 12 months. Functional success was defined as no symptoms of watery eyes over the same period.
RESULTS: In the no-flap en-DCR patients, the granulation was formed in 42 sides (79.2 %): 18 sides (34.0 %) on the superior portion, 9 sides (17.0 %) on the inferior portion, 35 sides (66.0 %) on the anterior portion, and only 1 side (1.9 %) on the posterior portion, which was very small. Based on these results, we performed the 3-flap ex-DCR with the anterior, superior, and inferior flaps. Anatomical success with this technique was achieved in all sides (100 %), and functional success was obtained in 66 of 70 sides (94.3 %).
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-flap ex-DCR did not cause recurrent nasolacrimal duct obstruction, rendering it a very useful technique in terms of quality of life and medical economics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Granulation; No-flap endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy; Re-obstruction; Three-flap external dacryocystorhinostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27590057     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-016-3490-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  18 in total

1.  A randomized study comparing DCR with and without excision of the posterior mucosal flap.

Authors:  Sherif Elwan
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2003-03

2.  A consideration of the time taken to do dacryo-cystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery.

Authors:  R Malhotra; M Wright; J M Olver
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Inferior flap anastomosis in external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Gürkan Erdoğan; Cihan Unlü; Ece Turan Vural; Aslan Aykut; Hüseyin Bayramlar
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.746

4.  Racial differences in nasal fossa dimensions determined by acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  N J Morgan; F B MacGregor; M A Birchall; V J Lund; Y Sittampalam
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  Quantitative study of the effect of dacryocystorhinostomy on lacrimal drainage.

Authors:  J M Malbouisson; M D Bittar; H N Obeid; F C Guimarães; A A Velasco e Cruz
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  1997-06

6.  Management of functional epiphora in patients with an anatomically patent dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Pari N Shams; Philip G Chen; Peter J Wormald; Brian Sloan; Geoff Wilcsek; Alan McNab; Dinesh Selva
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  J Hartikainen; R Grenman; P Puukka; H Seppä
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Long-term outcomes in primary powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Javed Ali; Alkis James Psaltis; Ahmed Bassiouni; Peter John Wormald
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Final nasolacrimal ostium after external dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Bülent Yazici; Zeynep Yazici
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01

10.  Prospective comparison of 3 dacryocystorhinostomy surgeries: external versus endoscopic versus transcanalicular multidiode laser.

Authors:  Melike Balikoglu-Yilmaz; Tolga Yilmaz; Umit Taskin; Muhittin Taskapili; Mehmet Akcay; M Faruk Oktay; Saban Eren
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accidental Ingestion of Nasal Packing Gauze during Endonasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy under Local Anesthesia: A Case Report.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi; Jacqueline Mupas-Uy; Yasuhiro Takahashi; Kazushige Ishida; Hirohiko Kakizaki
Journal:  Case Rep Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-20

2.  The marvel of instant mucosal lining in dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Lakshmi Mahesh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.969

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.