Literature DB >> 27589972

Spillover from adjacent crop and forest habitats shapes carabid beetle assemblages in fragmented semi-natural grasslands.

Gudrun Schneider1, Jochen Krauss2, Fabian A Boetzl1, Michael-Andreas Fritze3, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter1.   

Abstract

Semi-natural grasslands in Europe are insect biodiversity hotspots and important source habitats delivering ecosystem services to adjacent agricultural land by species spillover. However, this spillover might also occur in the opposite direction, affecting the diversity of semi-natural grasslands. This opposite spillover has got little attention in scientific literature even though generalist species penetrating into the grasslands can affect local biotic interactions, community composition and the conservation value of grassland habitats. In this study, we examined spillover effects from two different adjacent habitat types on carabid beetle assemblages in 20 semi-natural calcareous grasslands. The grasslands were either adjacent to a cereal crop field or to a coniferous forest. We found distinct differences in carabid beetle assemblages in calcareous grasslands depending on adjacent habitat type. Species richness and activity density were higher, but the evenness was lower in calcareous grasslands adjacent to crop fields compared with calcareous grasslands adjacent to coniferous forests. Further, we found a strong spillover of carabid beetles from adjacent crop fields after crop harvest, which may result in transiently increased predation pressure and resource competition in calcareous grasslands. Our results highlight that species composition, diversity and presumably ecosystem functions within semi-natural habitats are affected by the type and management of surrounding habitats. This needs to be considered by nature conservation measures, which aim to protect the unique insect communities of semi-natural European grasslands.

Keywords:  Calcareous grassland; Crop harvest; Edge effect; Insect species richness; Nature conservation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27589972     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3710-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

Review 1.  Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses.

Authors:  Teja Tscharntke; Jason M Tylianakis; Tatyana A Rand; Raphael K Didham; Lenore Fahrig; Péter Batáry; Janne Bengtsson; Yann Clough; Thomas O Crist; Carsten F Dormann; Robert M Ewers; Jochen Fründ; Robert D Holt; Andrea Holzschuh; Alexandra M Klein; David Kleijn; Claire Kremen; Doug A Landis; William Laurance; David Lindenmayer; Christoph Scherber; Navjot Sodhi; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Carsten Thies; Wim H van der Putten; Catrin Westphal
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2012-01-24

2.  Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats.

Authors:  Tatyana A Rand; Jason M Tylianakis; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Landscape connectivity promotes plant biodiversity spillover into non-target habitats.

Authors:  Lars A Brudvig; Ellen I Damschen; Joshua J Tewksbury; Nick M Haddad; Douglas J Levey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Consequences of dominance: a review of evenness effects on local and regional ecosystem processes.

Authors:  Helmut Hillebrand; Danuta M Bennett; Marc W Cadotte
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 5.  Theoretical perspectives on resource pulses.

Authors:  Robert D Holt
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Scale-dependent effects of landscape composition and configuration on natural enemy diversity, crop herbivory, and yields.

Authors:  Emily A Martin; Bumsuk Seo; Chan-Ryul Park; Björn Reineking; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Direct effects of tillage on the activity density of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) weed seed predators.

Authors:  A F Shearin; S C Reberg-Horton; E R Gallandt
Journal:  Environ Entomol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.377

8.  Decreased functional diversity and biological pest control in conventional compared to organic crop fields.

Authors:  Jochen Krauss; Iris Gallenberger; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Expansion of mass-flowering crops leads to transient pollinator dilution and reduced wild plant pollination.

Authors:  Andrea Holzschuh; Carsten F Dormann; Teja Tscharntke; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Temperature effects on pitfall catches of epigeal arthropods: a model and method for bias correction.

Authors:  Pavel Saska; Wopke van der Werf; Lia Hemerik; Martin L Luff; Timothy D Hatten; Alois Honek; Michael Pocock
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 6.528

View more
  4 in total

1.  Temporal changes in the spatial distribution of carabid beetles around arable field-woodlot boundaries.

Authors:  Michal Knapp; Miroslav Seidl; Jana Knappová; Martin Macek; Pavel Saska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Early successional dynamics of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the tropical dry forest ecosystem in Colombia.

Authors:  Gloria Maria Ariza; Jorge Jácome; Héctor Eduardo Esquivel; D Johan Kotze
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.546

3.  Boundaries in ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and environmental variables at the edges of forest patches with residential developments.

Authors:  Doreen E Davis; Sara A Gagné
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  It's a matter of design-how pitfall trap design affects trap samples and possible predictions.

Authors:  Fabian A Boetzl; Elena Ries; Gudrun Schneider; Jochen Krauss
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.