| Literature DB >> 27589702 |
Guangmang Liu1,2, Xianjian Wu3,4, Gang Jia5,6, Xiaoling Chen7,8, Hua Zhao9,10, Jing Wang11, Caimei Wu12,13, Jingyi Cai14,15.
Abstract
Arginine regulates growth performance, nutrient metabolism and health effects, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. This study aims to investigate the effect of dietary arginine supplementation on rat growth performance and urinary metabolome through ¹H-NMR spectroscopy. Twenty rats were randomly assigned to two groups supplemented with 0% or 1.0% l-arginine for 4 weeks. Urine samples were analyzed through NMR-based metabolomics. Arginine supplementation significantly increased the urine levels of 4-aminohippurate, acetate, creatine, creatinine, ethanolamine, formate, hippurate, homogentisate, indoxyl sulfate, and phenylacetyglycine. Conversely, arginine decreased the urine levels of acetamide, β-glucose, cirtulline, ethanol, glycine, isobutyrate, lactate, malonate, methymalonate, N-acetylglutamate, N-methylnicotinamide, and propionate. Results suggested that arginine can alter common systemic metabolic processes, including energy metabolism, amino acid metabolism, and gut microbiota metabolism. Moreover, the results also imply a possible physiological role of the metabolism in mediating the arginine supplementation-supported growth of rats.Entities:
Keywords: arginine; metabolism; metabolomic profiles; urine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27589702 PMCID: PMC6273504 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21091142
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Effects of arginine supplementation on body weight gain and food intake of rats (n = 10).
| Parameters | Control | Arginine | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean daily body weight gain (g) | 2.95 | 3.60 | 0.16 | 0.03 |
| Mean daily food intake (g) | 21.95 | 23.91 | 0.59 | 0.14 |
| Food intake/body weight gain ratio | 8.86 | 7.19 | 1.04 | 0.25 |
Figure 1Typical one-dimensional 1H-NMR spectra obtained from representative rat urine samples of the control and arginine groups. The region of δ 6.2 to δ 9.5 was magnified four times compared with the corresponding region of δ 0.7 to δ 6.2 for clarity. A total of 51 metabolites were assigned. The chemical shifts and peak multiplicities of these metabolites are shown in Table 2.
1H-NMR data of metabolites in rat urine.
| Keys | Metabolites | Moieties | δ 1H (ppm) and Multiplicity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bile acids | CH3 | 0.64 (m), 0.75 (m) |
| 2 | α-Hydroxy-iso-valerate | δCH3, CH3 | 0.83 (d), 0.97 (d) |
| 3 | α-Hydroxybutyrate | CH3 | 0.89 (t) |
| 4 | Propionate | CH3 | 1.06 (t) |
| 5 | Isobutyrate | CH3 | 1.13 (d) |
| 6 | Ethanol | CH3 | 1.19 (t) |
| 7 | Methylmalonate | CH3, CH | 1.25 (d), 3.75 (m) |
| 8 | α-Hydroxy- | CH3, γCH2 | 0.89 (t), 1.31 (m) |
| 9 | Lactate | αCH, βCH3 | 4.14 (q), 1.33 (d) |
| 10 | Alanine | αCH, βCH3 | 3.77 (q), 1.47 (d) |
| 11 | Citrulline | γCH2, βCH2 | 1.56 (m), 1.82 (m) |
| 12 | Acetate | CH3 | 1.92 (s) |
| 13 | Acetamide | CH3 | 1.99 (s) |
| 14 | βCH2, γCH2, CH3 | 2.06 (m), 1.87 (m), 2.03 (s) | |
| 15 | Acetone | CH3 | 2.24 (s) |
| 16 | Acetoacetate | CH3 | 2.28 (s) |
| 17 | Pyruvate | CH3 | 2.33 (s) |
| 18 | Succinate | CH2 | 2.40 (s) |
| 19 | α-Ketoglutarate | βCH2, γCH2 | 2.45 (t), 3.01 (t) |
| 20 | Citrate | CH2 | 2.54 (d), 2.68 (d) |
| 21 | Methylamine | CH3 | 2.61 (s) |
| 22 | Dimethylamine | CH3 | 2.71 (s) |
| 23 | Methylguanidine | CH3 | 2.81 (s) |
| 24 | Trimethylamine | CH3 | 2.88 (s) |
| 25 | Dimethylglycine | CH3 | 2.93 (s) |
| 26 | Creatine | CH3, CH2 | 3.04 (s), 3.93 (s) |
| 27 | Creatinine | CH3, CH2 | 3.04 (s), 4.05 (s) |
| 28 | Ornithine | CH2 | 3.06 (t) |
| 29 | Ethanolamine | CH2 | 3.11 (t) |
| 30 | Malonate | CH2 | 3.15 (s) |
| 31 | Choline | OCH2, NCH2, N(CH3)3 | 4.07 (t), 3.53 (t), 3.21 (s) |
| 32 | Taurine | -CH2-S, -CH2-NH2 | 3.27 (t), 3.43 (t) |
| 33 | TMAO a | CH3 | 3.27 (s) |
| 34 | Glycine | CH2 | 3.57 (s) |
| 35 | Sarcosine | CH2 | 3.6 (s) |
| 36 | Phenylacetyglycine | 2,6-CH, 3,5-CH, 7-CH, 10-CH | 7.30 (t), 7.36 (m), 7.42 (m), 3.67 (s) |
| 37 | Hippurate | CH2, 3,5-CH, 4-CH, 2,6-CH | 3.97 (d), 7.55 (t), 7.63 (t), 7.84 (d) |
| 38 | CH3, 5-CH, 4-CH, 6-CH, CH2 | 4.42 (s), 8.21 (d), 8.87 (d), 8.93 (d), 9.24 (s) | |
| 39 | β-Glucose | 1-CH, 2-CH, 3-CH, 4-CH, 5-CH, 6-CH | 4.47 (d), 3.25 (dd), 3.49 (t), 3.41 (dd), 3.46 (m), 3.73 (dd), 3.90 (dd) |
| 40 | α-Glucose | 1-CH, 2-CH, 3-CH, 4-CH, 5-CH, 6-CH | 5.24 (d), 3.54 (dd), 3.71 (dd), 3.42 (dd), 3.84 (m), 3.78 (m) |
| 41 | Allantoin | CH | 5.39 (s) |
| 42 | Urea | NH2 | 5.82 (s) |
| 43 | Homogentisate | 6-CH, 5-CH | 6.67 (d), 6.82 (d), |
| 44 | 6-CH, 2-CH, 3,5-CH | 3.6 (s), 6.85 (d), 7.15 (d) | |
| 45 | 6-CH, 4-CH, 3-CH | 6.92 (m), 7.04 (d), 7.26 (t) | |
| 46 | Indoxyl sulfate | 4-CH, 5-CH, 6-CH, 7-CH, CH | 7.51 (m), 7.22 (m), 7.28 (m), 7.71 (m), 7.37 (s) |
| 47 | Nicotinamide | 2-CH, 4-CH, 5-CH, 6-CH | 8.94 (d), 8.61 (dd), 8.25 (m), 7.5 (dd) |
| 48 | 4-Aminohippurate | CH2, CH | 7.6 (d), 6.8 (d), 3.9 (d) |
| 49 | Benzoate | 2,6-CH, 3,5-CH, 4-CH | 7.87 (d),7.49 (dd), 7.56 (t) |
| 50 | Trigonelline | 2-CH, 4-CH, 6-CH, 5-CH, CH3 | 9.09 (s), 8.85 (m), 8.81 (dd), 8.07 (m), 4.44 (s) |
| 51 | Formate | CH | 8.46 (s) |
a TMAO, trimethylamine-N-oxide; s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; dd, doublet of doublets; m, multiplet.
Figure 2PCA score plots (R2X = 0.456 and Q2 = 0.141; (A) and PLS-DA score plots (R2X = 0.312, R2Y = 0.978, and Q2 = 0.873; (B) obtained through 1H-NMR spectra of 24 h urine samples from the arginine (red circles) and control (black squares) groups.
Figure 3OPLS-DA scores plots (left panel) and the corresponding coefficient loading plots (right panel) obtained from the 1H-NMR spectra of 24 h urine samples from the control (black squares) and arginine (red circles) groups (R2X = 0.312, Q2 = 0.529). Two samples from the control group were excluded because they were outside the Hotelling’s T2 ellipse on the score plot. A color scale in the coefficient plot demonstrates the significance of metabolite variation between the arginine and control groups.
OPLS-DA coefficients obtained from the NMR data of urine metabolites derived from the (A) control and (B) arginine groups.
| Metabolite | OPLS-DA Coefficient (r) a | |
|---|---|---|
| B (vs. A) | B (vs. A) | |
| 4-Aminohippurate (48) | 0.798 | <0.05 |
| Acetamide (13) | −0.661 | <0.05 |
| Acetate (12) | 0.760 | <0.05 |
| β-Glucose (39) | −0.603 | <0.05 |
| Citrulline (11) | −0.889 | <0.05 |
| Creatine (26) | 0.794 | <0.05 |
| Creatinine (27) | 0.915 | <0.05 |
| Ethanol (6) | −0.932 | <0.05 |
| Ethanolamine (29) | 0.618 | <0.05 |
| Formate (51) | 0.660 | <0.05 |
| Glycine (34) | −0.832 | <0.05 |
| Hippurate (37) | 0.632 | <0.05 |
| Homogentisate (43) | 0.654 | <0.05 |
| Indoxyl sulfate (46) | 0.742 | <0.05 |
| Isobutyrate (5) | −0.871 | <0.05 |
| Lactate (9) | −0.715 | <0.05 |
| Malonate (30) | −0.716 | <0.05 |
| Methymalonate (7) | −0.953 | <0.05 |
| −0.855 | <0.05 | |
| −0.642 | <0.05 | |
| Phenylacetyglycine (36) | 0.650 | <0.05 |
| Propionate (4) | −0.825 | <0.05 |
| α-Hydroxy- | −0.748 | <0.05 |
| α-Ketoglutarate (19) | 0.665 | <0.05 |
a Metabolite keys are shown in Table 2. Correlation coefficients were obtained from the OPLS-DA results, with the positive and negative signs suggesting the positive and negative correlation, respectively, with the concentrations. The correlation coefficient of |r| higher than 0.602 represents the cutoff value; b Normalized integral of metabolites in the spectrum (normalized to 100). Integrals of the altered metabolites were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). p values are significant at the <0.05 level.