Literature DB >> 27588192

Impact of intraoperative specimen mammography on margins in breast-conserving surgery.

Tomoka Hisada1, Masataka Sawaki1, Junko Ishiguro1, Yayoi Adachi1, Haruru Kotani1, Akiyo Yoshimura1, Masaya Hattori1, Yasushi Yatabe2, Hiroji Iwata1.   

Abstract

A positive resection margin is one of the most significant risk factors for local breast cancer recurrence following breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Intraoperative specimen mammography (SMMG) is routinely used to evaluate the surgical margin at our institution. The aim of the present study was to assess the adequacy of SMMG for margin assessment. The patient cohort included 174 women who underwent BCS in 2006. The sensitivity and specificity of SMMG were assessed by comparing the margins assessed by histological and radiological methods. It was also examined whether the rate of positive histological margins was decreased by re-excision following SMMG evaluation. A total of 23 false-negatives and 6 false-positives were determined by SMMG. The sensitivity and specificity of SMMG margin assessment for patients with primary breast cancer were 20.6 and 94.6%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 50% and the negative predictive value was 82.2%. A subgroup analysis revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of SMMG in cases with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were higher compared with those in invasive ductal carcinoma. Furthermore, the positive histological margin rate was not affected by re-excision. Although the general usefulness of intraoperative SMMG was not proven, this procedure may be useful in specific cases, particularly those with DCIS and those diagnosed by stereotactic biopsy. A prospective study with exact criteria and a standard procedure is required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast-conserving surgery; intraoperative mammography; intraoperative radiography; specimen mammography

Year:  2016        PMID: 27588192      PMCID: PMC4998078          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  22 in total

Review 1.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors:  M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  High resolution intra-operative two-dimensional specimen mammography and its impact on second operation for re-excision of positive margins at final pathology after breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Lokesh Bathla; Ann Harris; Mary Davey; Poonam Sharma; Edibaldo Silva
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  [Specimen radiography assessment of surgical margins status in subclinical breast carcinoma: a diagnostic study].

Authors:  C-J Fouché; F Tabareau; P Michenet; P Lebas; E-G Simon
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2011-02-23

4.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  A new method of margin evaluation in breast conservation surgery using an adjustable mould during fixation.

Authors:  S Ichihara; H Suzuki; M Kasami; H Aoyama; Y Sato; M Oiwa; K Kurokawa; T Endo
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Neslihan Cabioglu; Kelly K Hunt; Aysegul A Sahin; Henry M Kuerer; Gildy V Babiera; S Eva Singletary; Gary J Whitman; Merrick I Ross; Frederick C Ames; Barry W Feig; Thomas A Buchholz; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-28       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens.

Authors:  A J Guidi; J L Connolly; J R Harris; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Is frozen section analysis of reexcision lumpectomy margins worthwhile? Margin analysis in breast reexcisions.

Authors:  E R Sauter; J P Hoffman; F D Ottery; M J Kowalyshyn; S Litwin; B L Eisenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Standardized and reproducible methodology for the comprehensive and systematic assessment of surgical resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez; Wenle P Wang; Ronald X Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Development of intraoperative assessment of margins in breast conserving surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Wanheng Li; Xiru Li
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

2.  Obtaining adequate surgical margin status in breast-conservation therapy: intraoperative ultrasound-guided resection versus specimen mammography.

Authors:  Maria Mihaela Pop; Silviu Cristian; Orsolya Hanko-Bauer; Dana Valentina Ghiga; Rares Georgescu
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2018-04-25

3.  Does conventional specimen radiography after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer help to reduce the rate of second surgeries?

Authors:  Benedikt Schaefgen; Annika Funk; H-P Sinn; Thomas Bruckner; Christina Gomez; Aba Harcos; Anne Stieber; Annabelle Haller; Juliane Nees; Riku Togawa; André Pfob; André Hennigs; Johanna Hederer; Fabian Riedel; Sarah Fastner; Christof Sohn; Jörg Heil; Michael Golatta
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 4.872

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.