Literature DB >> 27587790

Changes in Chromatin Structure in Curettage Specimens Identifies High-Risk Patients in Endometrial Cancer.

Tarjei S Hveem1,2,3, Tormund S Njølstad4,5, Birgitte Nielsen1,2, Rolf Anders Syvertsen1,2, John Arne Nesheim1,2, Marna L Kjæreng1,2, Wanja Kildal1,2, Manohar Pradhan1,2, Janusz Marcickiewicz6,7, Solveig Tingulstad8, Anne C Staff9, Hans K Haugland10, Runar Eraker11,12, Klaus Oddenes13, Jan A Rokne14, Jostein Tjugum15, Margaret S Lode16, Frederic Amant17, Henrica M J Werner4,5, Line Bjørge, Fritz Albregtsen1,3, Knut Liestøl2,3, Helga B Salvesen4,5, Jone Trovik4,5, Håvard E Danielsen18,2,3,19.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most endometrial carcinoma patients are diagnosed at an early stage with a good prognosis. However, a relatively low fraction with lethal disease constitutes a substantial number of patients due to the high incidence rate. Preoperative identification of patients with high risk and low risk for poor outcome is necessary to tailor treatment. Nucleotyping refers to characterization of cell nuclei by image cytometry, including the assessment of chromatin structure by nuclear texture analysis. This method is a strong prognostic marker in many cancers but has not been evaluated in preoperative curettage specimens from endometrial carcinoma.
METHODS: The prognostic impact of changes in chromatin structure quantified with Nucleotyping was evaluated in preoperative curettage specimens from 791 endometrial carcinoma patients prospectively included in the MoMaTEC multicenter trial.
RESULTS: Nucleotyping was an independent prognostic marker of disease-specific survival in preoperative curettage specimens among patients with Federation Internationale des Gynaecologistes et Obstetristes (FIGO) stage I-II disease (HR=2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-6.5; P = 0.013) and significantly associated with age, FIGO stage, histologic type, histologic grade, myometrial infiltration, lymph node status, curettage histology type, and DNA ploidy.
CONCLUSIONS: Nucleotyping in preoperative curettage specimens is an independent prognostic marker for disease-specific survival, with potential to supplement existing parameters for risk stratification to tailor treatment. IMPACT: This is the first study to evaluate the prognostic impact of Nucleotyping in curettage specimens from endometrial carcinoma and shows that this may be a clinically useful prognostic marker in endometrial cancer. External validation is warranted. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(1); 61-67. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27587790     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  4 in total

1.  Integrating pathology, chromosomal instability and mutations for risk stratification in early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Jiaqi Li; Ensong Guo; Jia Huang; Guangguang Fang; Shaohua Chen; Bin Yang; Yu Fu; Fuxia Li; Zizhuo Wang; Rourou Xiao; Chen Liu; Yuhan Huang; Xue Wu; Funian Lu; Lixin You; Ling Feng; Ling Xi; Peng Wu; Ding Ma; Chaoyang Sun; Beibei Wang; Gang Chen
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 7.133

2.  Large-scale DNA organization is a prognostic marker of breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Martial Guillaud; Qian Ye; Sam Leung; Anita Carraro; Alan Harrison; Malcolm Hayes; Alan Nichol; Mira Keyes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Chromatin organisation and cancer prognosis: a pan-cancer study.

Authors:  Andreas Kleppe; Fritz Albregtsen; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Manohar Pradhan; Birgitte Nielsen; Tarjei S Hveem; Hanne A Askautrud; Gunnar B Kristensen; Arild Nesbakken; Jone Trovik; Håkon Wæhre; Ian Tomlinson; Neil A Shepherd; Marco Novelli; David J Kerr; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 54.433

4.  Association Between Proportion of Nuclei With High Chromatin Entropy and Prognosis in Gynecological Cancers.

Authors:  Birgitte Nielsen; Andreas Kleppe; Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; Manohar Pradhan; Rolf Anders Syvertsen; John Arne Nesheim; Gunnar Balle Kristensen; Jone Trovik; David James Kerr; Fritz Albregtsen; Håvard Emil Danielsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 13.506

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.