Stal S Shrestha1, Jeih-San Liow2, Kimberly Jenko2, Masamichi Ikawa2, Sami S Zoghbi2, Robert B Innis2. 1. Molecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, Maryland stal.shrestha@nih.gov. 2. Molecular Imaging Branch, National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract
Prazosin, a potent and selective α1-adrenoceptor antagonist, displaces 25% of 11C-CUMI-101 ([O-methyl-11C]2-(4-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)butyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-triazine-3,5(2H,4H)dione) binding in monkey cerebellum. We sought to estimate the percentage contamination of 11C-CUMI-101 binding to α1-adrenoceptors in human cerebellum under in vivo conditions. In vitro receptor-binding techniques were used to measure α1-adrenoceptor density and the affinity of CUMI-101 for these receptors in human, monkey, and rat cerebellum. METHODS: Binding potential (maximum number of binding sites × affinity [(1/dissociation constant]) was determined using in vitro homogenate binding assays in human, monkey, and rat cerebellum. 3H-prazosin was used to determine the maximum number of binding sites, as well as the dissociation constant of 3H-prazosin and the inhibition constant of CUMI-101. RESULTS: α1-adrenoceptor density and the affinity of CUMI-101 for these receptors were similar across species. Cerebellar binding potentials were 3.7 for humans, 2.3 for monkeys, and 3.4 for rats. CONCLUSION: Reasoning by analogy, 25% of 11C-CUMI-101 uptake in human cerebellum reflects binding to α1-adrenoceptors, suggesting that the cerebellum is of limited usefulness as a reference tissue for quantification in human studies.
Prazosin, a potent and selective α1-adrenoceptor antagonist, displaces 25% of 11C-CUMI-101 ([O-methyl-11C]2-(4-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)butyl)-4-methyl-1,2,4-triazine-3,5(2H,4H)dione) binding in monkey cerebellum. We sought to estimate the percentage contamination of 11C-CUMI-101 binding to α1-adrenoceptors in human cerebellum under in vivo conditions. In vitro receptor-binding techniques were used to measure α1-adrenoceptor density and the affinity of CUMI-101 for these receptors in human, monkey, and rat cerebellum. METHODS: Binding potential (maximum number of binding sites × affinity [(1/dissociation constant]) was determined using in vitro homogenate binding assays in human, monkey, and rat cerebellum. 3H-prazosin was used to determine the maximum number of binding sites, as well as the dissociation constant of 3H-prazosin and the inhibition constant of CUMI-101. RESULTS: α1-adrenoceptor density and the affinity of CUMI-101 for these receptors were similar across species. Cerebellar binding potentials were 3.7 for humans, 2.3 for monkeys, and 3.4 for rats. CONCLUSION: Reasoning by analogy, 25% of 11C-CUMI-101 uptake in human cerebellum reflects binding to α1-adrenoceptors, suggesting that the cerebellum is of limited usefulness as a reference tissue for quantification in human studies.
Authors: J S Dileep Kumar; Vattoly J Majo; Shu-Chi Hsiung; Matthew S Millak; Kuo-Peing Liu; Hadassah Tamir; Jaya Prabhakaran; Norman R Simpson; Ronald L Van Heertum; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2006-01-12 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Vincent J Cunningham; Eugenii A Rabiner; Mark Slifstein; Marc Laruelle; Roger N Gunn Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: R N Daly; A C Sulpizio; B Levitt; R M DeMarinis; J W Regan; R R Ruffolo; J P Hieble Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1988-10 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Stal Saurav Shrestha; Jeih-San Liow; Shuiyu Lu; Kimberly Jenko; Robert L Gladding; Per Svenningsson; Cheryl L Morse; Sami S Zoghbi; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Chul Hyoung Lyoo; Masamichi Ikawa; Jeih-San Liow; Sami S Zoghbi; Cheryl L Morse; Victor W Pike; Masahiro Fujita; Robert B Innis; William Charles Kreisl Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: J S Dileep Kumar; Ramin V Parsey; Suham A Kassir; Vattoly J Majo; Matthew S Milak; Jaya Prabhakaran; Norman R Simpson; Mark D Underwood; J John Mann; Victoria Arango Journal: Brain Res Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Junli Chen; Ahsan K Murad; Laurence P G Wakelin; William A Denny; Renate Griffith; Angela M Finch Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: J S Dileep Kumar; Jaya Prabhakaran; Vattoly J Majo; Matthew S Milak; Shu-Chi Hsiung; Hadassah Tamir; Norman R Simpson; Ronald L Van Heertum; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-01-13 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Vladimir Shalgunov; Aren van Waarde; Jan Booij; Martin C Michel; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Philip H Elsinga Journal: Med Res Rev Date: 2018-11-18 Impact factor: 12.944